Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees

Z. Svoboda, M. Janura, L. Cabell, M. Elfmark,

. 2012 ; 36 (2) : 225-30.

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK SAGE Publications Journals from 1999-01-01 to 2015-12-31
SAGE Journals from 2012-01-01 to 2012-05-31

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic gait increases demands on stability. Some variability measures can be used to investigate the stability of movement for prosthetic feet. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the prosthetic foot on ground reaction force variability for transtibial amputee gait. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Eleven male unilateral transtibial amputees participated in this study. Each subject walked at self-selected speed with both conventional (SACH) and energy storing (Sureflex) feet. Time and ground reaction force variables and their coefficients of variation were calculated for each foot type and limb. RESULTS: Mediolateral force variables had high variability for all conditions. The Sureflex had a larger variability than the SACH foot for the braking peak (p < 0.05), which may have been caused by gait instability after the heel strike. There were significant differences between intact and prosthetic limbs in total loading (force impulses) with the SACH foot (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prosthetic foot and alignment issues related to the foot influence GRF variability. During the braking phase the SACH foot is characterized by higher variability in mediolateral direction and Sureflex by higher variability in anterior-posterior direction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Differences in variability in ground reaction force variables can represent a person's stability. Observing variability can contribute to better understanding of critical events in gait cycle with the use of various prosthetic feet.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13000905
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20130111095328.0
007      
ta
008      
130108s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1177/0309364612439572 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)22440580
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Svoboda, Zdenek $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. zdenek.svoboda@upol.cz
245    10
$a Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees / $c Z. Svoboda, M. Janura, L. Cabell, M. Elfmark,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Prosthetic gait increases demands on stability. Some variability measures can be used to investigate the stability of movement for prosthetic feet. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the prosthetic foot on ground reaction force variability for transtibial amputee gait. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Eleven male unilateral transtibial amputees participated in this study. Each subject walked at self-selected speed with both conventional (SACH) and energy storing (Sureflex) feet. Time and ground reaction force variables and their coefficients of variation were calculated for each foot type and limb. RESULTS: Mediolateral force variables had high variability for all conditions. The Sureflex had a larger variability than the SACH foot for the braking peak (p < 0.05), which may have been caused by gait instability after the heel strike. There were significant differences between intact and prosthetic limbs in total loading (force impulses) with the SACH foot (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prosthetic foot and alignment issues related to the foot influence GRF variability. During the braking phase the SACH foot is characterized by higher variability in mediolateral direction and Sureflex by higher variability in anterior-posterior direction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Differences in variability in ground reaction force variables can represent a person's stability. Observing variability can contribute to better understanding of critical events in gait cycle with the use of various prosthetic feet.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a amputovaní $7 D000674
650    _2
$a umělé končetiny $7 D001186
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a chůze (způsob) $x fyziologie $7 D005684
650    _2
$a pata $x fyziologie $7 D006365
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a pohyb $x fyziologie $7 D009068
650    _2
$a posturální rovnováha $x fyziologie $7 D004856
650    _2
$a protézy - design $7 D011474
650    _2
$a tibie $x chirurgie $7 D013977
650    _2
$a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $x fyziologie $7 D016474
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Janura, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Cabell, Lee
700    1_
$a Elfmark, Milan
773    0_
$w MED00011478 $t Prosthetics and orthotics international $x 1746-1553 $g Roč. 36, č. 2 (2012), s. 225-30
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22440580 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20130111095435 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 963687 $s 799069
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2012 $b 36 $c 2 $d 225-30 $i 1746-1553 $m Prosthetics and orthotics international $n Prosthet Orthot Int $x MED00011478
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130108

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...