-
Something wrong with this record ?
Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees
Z. Svoboda, M. Janura, L. Cabell, M. Elfmark,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
SAGE Publications Journals
from 1999-01-01 to 2015-12-31
SAGE Journals
from 2012-01-01 to 2012-05-31
- MeSH
- Amputees MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Gait physiology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Heel physiology MeSH
- Movement physiology MeSH
- Postural Balance physiology MeSH
- Prosthesis Design MeSH
- Tibia surgery MeSH
- Artificial Limbs MeSH
- Weight-Bearing physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND: Prosthetic gait increases demands on stability. Some variability measures can be used to investigate the stability of movement for prosthetic feet. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the prosthetic foot on ground reaction force variability for transtibial amputee gait. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Eleven male unilateral transtibial amputees participated in this study. Each subject walked at self-selected speed with both conventional (SACH) and energy storing (Sureflex) feet. Time and ground reaction force variables and their coefficients of variation were calculated for each foot type and limb. RESULTS: Mediolateral force variables had high variability for all conditions. The Sureflex had a larger variability than the SACH foot for the braking peak (p < 0.05), which may have been caused by gait instability after the heel strike. There were significant differences between intact and prosthetic limbs in total loading (force impulses) with the SACH foot (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prosthetic foot and alignment issues related to the foot influence GRF variability. During the braking phase the SACH foot is characterized by higher variability in mediolateral direction and Sureflex by higher variability in anterior-posterior direction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Differences in variability in ground reaction force variables can represent a person's stability. Observing variability can contribute to better understanding of critical events in gait cycle with the use of various prosthetic feet.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc13000905
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20130111095328.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 130108s2012 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1177/0309364612439572 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)22440580
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Svoboda, Zdenek $u Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. zdenek.svoboda@upol.cz
- 245 10
- $a Variability of kinetic variables during gait in unilateral transtibial amputees / $c Z. Svoboda, M. Janura, L. Cabell, M. Elfmark,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Prosthetic gait increases demands on stability. Some variability measures can be used to investigate the stability of movement for prosthetic feet. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of the prosthetic foot on ground reaction force variability for transtibial amputee gait. STUDY DESIGN: Comparative analysis. METHODS: Eleven male unilateral transtibial amputees participated in this study. Each subject walked at self-selected speed with both conventional (SACH) and energy storing (Sureflex) feet. Time and ground reaction force variables and their coefficients of variation were calculated for each foot type and limb. RESULTS: Mediolateral force variables had high variability for all conditions. The Sureflex had a larger variability than the SACH foot for the braking peak (p < 0.05), which may have been caused by gait instability after the heel strike. There were significant differences between intact and prosthetic limbs in total loading (force impulses) with the SACH foot (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prosthetic foot and alignment issues related to the foot influence GRF variability. During the braking phase the SACH foot is characterized by higher variability in mediolateral direction and Sureflex by higher variability in anterior-posterior direction. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Differences in variability in ground reaction force variables can represent a person's stability. Observing variability can contribute to better understanding of critical events in gait cycle with the use of various prosthetic feet.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a amputovaní $7 D000674
- 650 _2
- $a umělé končetiny $7 D001186
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a chůze (způsob) $x fyziologie $7 D005684
- 650 _2
- $a pata $x fyziologie $7 D006365
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a pohyb $x fyziologie $7 D009068
- 650 _2
- $a posturální rovnováha $x fyziologie $7 D004856
- 650 _2
- $a protézy - design $7 D011474
- 650 _2
- $a tibie $x chirurgie $7 D013977
- 650 _2
- $a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $x fyziologie $7 D016474
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Janura, Miroslav
- 700 1_
- $a Cabell, Lee
- 700 1_
- $a Elfmark, Milan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011478 $t Prosthetics and orthotics international $x 1746-1553 $g Roč. 36, č. 2 (2012), s. 225-30
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22440580 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20130108 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20130111095435 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 963687 $s 799069
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 36 $c 2 $d 225-30 $i 1746-1553 $m Prosthetics and orthotics international $n Prosthet Orthot Int $x MED00011478
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20130108