• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Second line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): comparison of efficacy of erlotinib and chemotherapy

O. Fiala, M. Pesek, J. Finek, J. Krejci, Z. Bortlicek, L. Benesova, M. Minarik,

. 2013 ; 60 (2) : 129-134.

Jazyk angličtina Země Slovensko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13024053

Molecular targeted therapy based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of novel options for management of NSCLC. Erlotinib is EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treatment of the advanced NSCLC. This presented study is focused on comparison of erlotinib and chemotherapy efficacy in the second line treatment of the advanced NSCLC. DCR and PFS became the primary endpoints.Total number of patients was 290. A group treated with chemotherapy in the second line consisted of 150 patients and a group treated with erlotinib in the second line consisted of 140 patients. Comparison of DCR was performed using Fisher's exact test, visualization of PFS was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences were tested using the log-rank test. Genetic testing was performed using PCR direct sequencing. In the group treated with chemotherapy 2 CR, 23 PR and 51 SD were achieved vs. 5 CR, 10 PR and 55 SD in the group treated with erlotinib in the second line. DCR in patients treated with chemotherapy was 54.0% vs. 51.3% in patients without EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib (p=0.707); in patients harboring EGFR mutation, treated with erlotinib (n=9) outstanding results were achieved: 4 CR, 2 PR and 3 SD (not tested). Median of PFS in patients treated with chemotherapy was 2.1 months vs. 1.9 months in patients without EGFR mutation (p=0.879) vs. 8.4 months in patients harboring EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib (p=0.017). Results of analysis show that even patients without EGFR mutation are able to benefit from erlotinib treatment in the second line. The efficacy (DCR, PFS) of erlotinib in patients without EGFR mutation was comparable with chemotherapy. The treatment efficacy in a subgroup of patients harbouring EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib was significantly better than in patients without EGFR mutation.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13024053
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170411120201.0
007      
ta
008      
130703s2013 xo f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.4149/neo_2013_017 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23259780
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xo
100    1_
$a Fiala, Ondřej $u Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Charles University Prague, Czech Republic. fiala.o@centrum.cz $7 xx0209889
245    10
$a Second line treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): comparison of efficacy of erlotinib and chemotherapy / $c O. Fiala, M. Pesek, J. Finek, J. Krejci, Z. Bortlicek, L. Benesova, M. Minarik,
520    9_
$a Molecular targeted therapy based on tyrosine kinase inhibitors, directed at the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is one of novel options for management of NSCLC. Erlotinib is EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for treatment of the advanced NSCLC. This presented study is focused on comparison of erlotinib and chemotherapy efficacy in the second line treatment of the advanced NSCLC. DCR and PFS became the primary endpoints.Total number of patients was 290. A group treated with chemotherapy in the second line consisted of 150 patients and a group treated with erlotinib in the second line consisted of 140 patients. Comparison of DCR was performed using Fisher's exact test, visualization of PFS was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and differences were tested using the log-rank test. Genetic testing was performed using PCR direct sequencing. In the group treated with chemotherapy 2 CR, 23 PR and 51 SD were achieved vs. 5 CR, 10 PR and 55 SD in the group treated with erlotinib in the second line. DCR in patients treated with chemotherapy was 54.0% vs. 51.3% in patients without EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib (p=0.707); in patients harboring EGFR mutation, treated with erlotinib (n=9) outstanding results were achieved: 4 CR, 2 PR and 3 SD (not tested). Median of PFS in patients treated with chemotherapy was 2.1 months vs. 1.9 months in patients without EGFR mutation (p=0.879) vs. 8.4 months in patients harboring EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib (p=0.017). Results of analysis show that even patients without EGFR mutation are able to benefit from erlotinib treatment in the second line. The efficacy (DCR, PFS) of erlotinib in patients without EGFR mutation was comparable with chemotherapy. The treatment efficacy in a subgroup of patients harbouring EGFR mutation treated with erlotinib was significantly better than in patients without EGFR mutation.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a antitumorózní látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000970
650    _2
$a nemalobuněčný karcinom plic $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $x mortalita $7 D002289
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a nádory plic $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $x mortalita $7 D008175
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mutace $7 D009154
650    _2
$a inhibitory proteinkinas $x terapeutické užití $7 D047428
650    _2
$a chinazoliny $x terapeutické užití $7 D011799
650    _2
$a erbB receptory $x genetika $7 D066246
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Pesek, M $u -
700    1_
$a Finek, J $u -
700    1_
$a Krejci, J $u -
700    1_
$a Bortlicek, Z $u -
700    1_
$a Benesova, L $u -
700    1_
$a Minarik, M $u -
773    0_
$w MED00003470 $t Neoplasma $x 0028-2685 $g Roč. 60, č. 2 (2013), s. 129-134
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23259780 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 1194 $c 659 $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170411120500 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 987733 $s 822433
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 60 $c 2 $d 129-134 $i 0028-2685 $m Neoplasma $n Neoplasma $x MED00003470
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130703

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...