Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A controlled trial of revascularization in acute stroke

M. Roubec, M. Kuliha, V. Procházka, J. Krajca, D. Czerny, T. Jonszta, A. Krajina, D. Sanák, K. Langová, R. Herzig, D. Skoloudík,

. 2013 ; 266 (3) : 871-878.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky kontrolované, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc13024063

Grantová podpora
NT11386 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
NT11046 MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

PURPOSE: To compare safety and utility of intraarterial revascularization with use of stents to no revascularization in patients who either failed to respond to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or have contraindications to IVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case-control study was approved by local ethics committees; all patients signed informed consent. One hundred thirty-one patients (74 men; mean age, 65.9 years ± 12.3; range, 25-86 years) with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion were enrolled; 75 underwent IVT. No further recanalization therapy was performed in 26 (35%) IVT-treated patients with MCA recanalization (group 1). Patients with IVT failure after 60 minutes were allocated to endovascular treatment (group 2A) or no further therapy (group 2B). Patients with contraindication to IVT were allocated to endovascular treatment within 8 hours since AIS onset (group 3A) or to no recanalization therapy (group 3B). Neurologic deficit at admission, MCA recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), and 3-month clinical outcome were evaluated. Favorable clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale score 0-2 at 3 months after stroke onset. Two-sided Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t test, Fisher exact test, multivariate logistic regression analysis of baseline variables, and complete MCA recanalization for the prediction of favorable clinical outcome were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission was 13.5, 16.0, 15.5, 15.0, and 16.0 in groups 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, respectively (P > .05); SICH occurred in one of 26 (3.8%), one of 23 (4.3%), one of 26 (3.8%), one of 31 (3.2%), and one of 25 (4.0%) patients, respectively (P > .05). MCA recanalization after endovascular treatment was achieved in 50 of 54 (92.6%) patients. Favorable outcome was significantly different between groups 2A and 2B (10 of 23 [43.5%] and four of 26 [15.4%], respectively; P = .03) and groups 3A and 3B (14 of 31 [45.2%] and two of 25 [8.0%], respectively; P = .004) and was dependent on MCA recanalization (odds ratio, 5.55; P = .006). CONCLUSION: In this controlled trial, intraarterial revascularization with stents was an effective and safe-effective treatment option in patients with acute MCA occlusion with contraindication to IVT or after IVT failure.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc13024063
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20240220115924.0
007      
ta
008      
130703s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1148/radiol.12120798 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23232292
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Roubec, Martin $u Comprehensive Stroke Center, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ostrava University and University Hospital Ostrava, 17 Listopadu 1790, CZ-708 52 Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic. $7 xx0231427
245    12
$a A controlled trial of revascularization in acute stroke / $c M. Roubec, M. Kuliha, V. Procházka, J. Krajca, D. Czerny, T. Jonszta, A. Krajina, D. Sanák, K. Langová, R. Herzig, D. Skoloudík,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To compare safety and utility of intraarterial revascularization with use of stents to no revascularization in patients who either failed to respond to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or have contraindications to IVT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The case-control study was approved by local ethics committees; all patients signed informed consent. One hundred thirty-one patients (74 men; mean age, 65.9 years ± 12.3; range, 25-86 years) with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion were enrolled; 75 underwent IVT. No further recanalization therapy was performed in 26 (35%) IVT-treated patients with MCA recanalization (group 1). Patients with IVT failure after 60 minutes were allocated to endovascular treatment (group 2A) or no further therapy (group 2B). Patients with contraindication to IVT were allocated to endovascular treatment within 8 hours since AIS onset (group 3A) or to no recanalization therapy (group 3B). Neurologic deficit at admission, MCA recanalization, symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH), and 3-month clinical outcome were evaluated. Favorable clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin scale score 0-2 at 3 months after stroke onset. Two-sided Mann-Whitney U test, independent samples t test, Fisher exact test, multivariate logistic regression analysis of baseline variables, and complete MCA recanalization for the prediction of favorable clinical outcome were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at admission was 13.5, 16.0, 15.5, 15.0, and 16.0 in groups 1, 2A, 2B, 3A, and 3B, respectively (P > .05); SICH occurred in one of 26 (3.8%), one of 23 (4.3%), one of 26 (3.8%), one of 31 (3.2%), and one of 25 (4.0%) patients, respectively (P > .05). MCA recanalization after endovascular treatment was achieved in 50 of 54 (92.6%) patients. Favorable outcome was significantly different between groups 2A and 2B (10 of 23 [43.5%] and four of 26 [15.4%], respectively; P = .03) and groups 3A and 3B (14 of 31 [45.2%] and two of 25 [8.0%], respectively; P = .004) and was dependent on MCA recanalization (odds ratio, 5.55; P = .006). CONCLUSION: In this controlled trial, intraarterial revascularization with stents was an effective and safe-effective treatment option in patients with acute MCA occlusion with contraindication to IVT or after IVT failure.
650    _2
$a akutní nemoc $7 D000208
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    12
$a cévní protézy $7 D001807
650    _2
$a revaskularizace mozku $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D002548
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a infarkt arteria cerebri media $x epidemiologie $x radiografie $x chirurgie $7 D020244
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
650    _2
$a prevalence $7 D015995
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    12
$a stenty $7 D015607
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
651    _2
$a Česká republika $x epidemiologie $7 D018153
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky kontrolované $7 D018848
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kuliha, Martin $7 xx0313290
700    1_
$a Procházka, Václav, $d 1961- $7 xx0070646
700    1_
$a Krajča, Jan $7 xx0234711
700    1_
$a Czerný, Daniel $7 xx0130698
700    1_
$a Jonszta, Tomáš $7 xx0130700
700    1_
$a Krajina, Antonín, $d 1958- $7 nlk20050172885
700    1_
$a Šaňák, Daniel $7 xx0104413
700    1_
$a Langová, Katerina
700    1_
$a Herzig, Roman, $d 1968- $7 mzk2007411122
700    1_
$a Školoudík, David, $d 1972- $7 xx0020614
773    0_
$w MED00004047 $t Radiology $x 1527-1315 $g Roč. 266, č. 3 (2013), s. 871-878
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23232292 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20130703 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20240220115922 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 987743 $s 822443
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 266 $c 3 $d 871-878 $i 1527-1315 $m Radiology $n Radiology $x MED00004047
GRA    __
$a NT11386 $p MZ0
GRA    __
$a NT11046 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20130703

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...