-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Influence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection on the composition of chicken cecal microbiota
P. Videnska, F. Sisak, H. Havlickova, M. Faldynova, I. Rychlik,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2005-01-12
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2005
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2005
Free Medical Journals
od 2005
PubMed Central
od 2005
Europe PubMed Central
od 2005
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2005-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2005-07-26
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2005
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2005-12-01
PubMed
23856245
DOI
10.1186/1746-6148-9-140
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- cékum mikrobiologie MeSH
- kur domácí mikrobiologie MeSH
- kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce veterinární MeSH
- Lactobacillus MeSH
- mikrobiota * genetika MeSH
- nemoci drůbeže mikrobiologie MeSH
- RNA ribozomální 16S genetika MeSH
- Salmonella enteritidis fyziologie MeSH
- salmonelová infekce u zvířat mikrobiologie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
BACKGROUND: Infection of newly hatched chicks with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) results in an inflammatory response in the intestinal tract which may influence the composition of gut microbiota. In this study we were therefore interested whether S. Enteritidis induced inflammation results in changes in the cecal microbiota. To reach this aim, we compared the cecal microbiota of non-infected chickens and those infected by S. Enteritidis by pyrosequencing the V3/V4 variable regions of genes coding for 16S rRNA. RESULTS: Cecal microbiota of chickens up to 19 days of life was dominated by representatives of Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae, followed by Lactobacillaceae. The presence of Lachnospiraceae did not change after S. Enteritidis infection. Enterobacteriaceae increased and Ruminococcaceae decreased after S. Enteritidis infection in two independent experiments although these results were not significant. A significant increase in both experiments was observed only for the representatives of Lactobacillaceae which may correlate with their microaerophilic growth characteristic compared to the obligate anaerobes from the families Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that S. Enteritidis infection influences the composition of the cecal microbiota in chickens but these changes are minor in nature and should be understood more as an indirect consequence of infection and inflammation rather than a positively selected evolutionary trait.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14040662
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200120152914.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140107s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/1746-6148-9-140 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23856245
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Videnska, Petra
- 245 10
- $a Influence of Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection on the composition of chicken cecal microbiota / $c P. Videnska, F. Sisak, H. Havlickova, M. Faldynova, I. Rychlik,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Infection of newly hatched chicks with Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis (S. Enteritidis) results in an inflammatory response in the intestinal tract which may influence the composition of gut microbiota. In this study we were therefore interested whether S. Enteritidis induced inflammation results in changes in the cecal microbiota. To reach this aim, we compared the cecal microbiota of non-infected chickens and those infected by S. Enteritidis by pyrosequencing the V3/V4 variable regions of genes coding for 16S rRNA. RESULTS: Cecal microbiota of chickens up to 19 days of life was dominated by representatives of Enterobacteriaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae, followed by Lactobacillaceae. The presence of Lachnospiraceae did not change after S. Enteritidis infection. Enterobacteriaceae increased and Ruminococcaceae decreased after S. Enteritidis infection in two independent experiments although these results were not significant. A significant increase in both experiments was observed only for the representatives of Lactobacillaceae which may correlate with their microaerophilic growth characteristic compared to the obligate anaerobes from the families Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that S. Enteritidis infection influences the composition of the cecal microbiota in chickens but these changes are minor in nature and should be understood more as an indirect consequence of infection and inflammation rather than a positively selected evolutionary trait.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a cékum $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $x mikrobiologie $7 D002645
- 650 _2
- $a Lactobacillus $7 D007778
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $x genetika $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci drůbeže $x mikrobiologie $7 D011201
- 650 _2
- $a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
- 650 _2
- $a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $x veterinární $7 D060888
- 650 _2
- $a salmonelová infekce u zvířat $x mikrobiologie $7 D012481
- 650 _2
- $a Salmonella enteritidis $x fyziologie $7 D012477
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Sisak, Frantisek $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Havlickova, Hana $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Faldynova, Marcela $u -
- 700 1_
- $a Rychlik, Ivan $u -
- 773 0_
- $w MED00172950 $t BMC veterinary research $x 1746-6148 $g Roč. 9, č. - (2013), s. 140
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23856245 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140107 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200120153250 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1005058 $s 839174
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 9 $c - $d 140 $i 1746-6148 $m BMC veterinary research $n BMC vet. res. $x MED00172950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140107