-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Direct high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of the enantiomeric purity of levodopa and methyldopa: comparison with pharmacopoeial polarimetric methods
M Dolezalova, M Tkaczykova
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
IZ3607
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Část
Zdroj
NLK
ScienceDirect (archiv)
od 1993-01-01 do 2009-12-31
- MeSH
- farmakopea jako téma * normy MeSH
- hodnotící studie jako téma MeSH
- levodopa * analýza izolace a purifikace MeSH
- ligandy MeSH
- methyldopa * analýza izolace a purifikace MeSH
- optická otáčivost MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- rozpouštědla MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- stereoizomerie MeSH
- teikoplanin chemie MeSH
- vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie metody MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Evropa MeSH
Chiral high-performance liquid chromatography was employed for determination of the enantiomeric purity of levodopa and methyldopa. The determination of D-DOPA in levodopa was accomplished using a chiral ligand-exchange chromatograpy with an ordinary C18 column and a chiral mobile phase containing N,N-dimethyl-L-phenylalanine and Cu(II) acetate or by means of LC on a teicoplanin column in conjunction with ethanol-water (65:35, v/v). Both methods gave good performance, however, the latter was faster and more convenient and suitable for routine analyses. For the determination of D-methyldopa a LC method based on the use of a teicoplanin column in polar organic mode with methanol-acetic acid-triethylamine (1,000:0.05:0.05, v/v/v) mobile phase was developed. The precision, accuracy, linearity and selectivity were satisfactory. In comparison with pharmacopoeial polarimetric methods (according to the European Pharmacopoeia and the Pharmacopoea Bohemoslovaca), the LC methods proved to be much more sensitive giving detection limits 0.04% of D-DOPA and 0.3% of D-methyldopa.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14045858
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140304155841.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140213s1999 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/s0731-7085(98)00257-x $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)10704122
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Doležalová, Milada $7 xx0075530 $u State Institute for Drug Control, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Direct high-performance liquid chromatographic determination of the enantiomeric purity of levodopa and methyldopa: comparison with pharmacopoeial polarimetric methods / $c M Dolezalova, M Tkaczykova
- 520 9_
- $a Chiral high-performance liquid chromatography was employed for determination of the enantiomeric purity of levodopa and methyldopa. The determination of D-DOPA in levodopa was accomplished using a chiral ligand-exchange chromatograpy with an ordinary C18 column and a chiral mobile phase containing N,N-dimethyl-L-phenylalanine and Cu(II) acetate or by means of LC on a teicoplanin column in conjunction with ethanol-water (65:35, v/v). Both methods gave good performance, however, the latter was faster and more convenient and suitable for routine analyses. For the determination of D-methyldopa a LC method based on the use of a teicoplanin column in polar organic mode with methanol-acetic acid-triethylamine (1,000:0.05:0.05, v/v/v) mobile phase was developed. The precision, accuracy, linearity and selectivity were satisfactory. In comparison with pharmacopoeial polarimetric methods (according to the European Pharmacopoeia and the Pharmacopoea Bohemoslovaca), the LC methods proved to be much more sensitive giving detection limits 0.04% of D-DOPA and 0.3% of D-methyldopa.
- 590 __
- $a bohemika - dle Pubmed
- 650 02
- $a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $x metody $7 D002851
- 650 02
- $a hodnotící studie jako téma $7 D005069
- 650 12
- $a levodopa $x analýza $x izolace a purifikace $7 D007980
- 650 02
- $a ligandy $7 D008024
- 650 12
- $a methyldopa $x analýza $x izolace a purifikace $7 D008750
- 650 02
- $a optická otáčivost $7 D009904
- 650 12
- $a farmakopea jako téma $x normy $7 D010602
- 650 02
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 02
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 02
- $a rozpouštědla $7 D012997
- 650 02
- $a stereoizomerie $7 D013237
- 650 02
- $a teikoplanin $x chemie $7 D017334
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Tkaczyková, Magda $7 xx0153130 $u State Institute for Drug Control, Prague, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $t Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $x 0731-7085 $g Roč. 19, č. 3-4 (1999), s. 555-567 $p J Pharm Biomed Anal $w MED00002894
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140213094407 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140304155844 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1012847 $s 844392
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BMC __
- $a 1999 $b 19 $c 3-4 $d 555-567 $x MED00002894 $i 0731-7085 $m Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis $n J Pharm Biomed Anal
- GRA __
- $a IZ3607 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a NLK 2014-02/lpbo