Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

SPI1 defective mutants of Salmonella enterica induce cross-protective immunity in chickens against challenge with serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis

M. Matulova, H. Havlickova, F. Sisak, V. Babak, I. Rychlik,

. 2013 ; 31 (31) : 3156-62.

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Family Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Health Management Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2002-01-01 to 2 months ago

In this study we were interested in the serovar cross-protection potential of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) attenuated vaccine strains of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium and immune response of vaccinated and naive chickens to Salmonella infection. The immune response was characterized by real time PCR quantifying transcripts of interleukins IL1β, IL17, IL22, interferon gamma (IFNγ), inducible NO synthase (iNOS), immunoglobulins IgM, IgA, IgY and Ig light chain, and six genes of acute phase response including avidin, serum amyloid A, extracellular fatty acid-binding protein (Ex-FABP), immune responsive gene 1, chemokine AH221 and trappin-6. Vaccination with SPI1 mutants of both serovars protected chickens against Salmonella infection, independent of the serovar used for the challenge and the time post infection. However, expressions of all interleukins, iNOS and Ex-FABP showed that protection against homologous serovars was significantly higher than against heterologous serovars after intravenous challenge at 4 days post infection. The vaccination with a mixture of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium SPI1 mutants induced an intermediate protection against challenge with both serovars, i.e. the mixed vaccine provided an additional protective effect when compared with the chickens vaccinated with a vaccine formed by only a single Salmonella serovar.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14051070
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140410103720.0
007      
ta
008      
140401s2013 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.05.002 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23684831
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Matulova, Marta
245    10
$a SPI1 defective mutants of Salmonella enterica induce cross-protective immunity in chickens against challenge with serovars Typhimurium and Enteritidis / $c M. Matulova, H. Havlickova, F. Sisak, V. Babak, I. Rychlik,
520    9_
$a In this study we were interested in the serovar cross-protection potential of Salmonella Pathogenicity Island 1 (SPI1) attenuated vaccine strains of Salmonella enterica serovars Enteritidis and Typhimurium and immune response of vaccinated and naive chickens to Salmonella infection. The immune response was characterized by real time PCR quantifying transcripts of interleukins IL1β, IL17, IL22, interferon gamma (IFNγ), inducible NO synthase (iNOS), immunoglobulins IgM, IgA, IgY and Ig light chain, and six genes of acute phase response including avidin, serum amyloid A, extracellular fatty acid-binding protein (Ex-FABP), immune responsive gene 1, chemokine AH221 and trappin-6. Vaccination with SPI1 mutants of both serovars protected chickens against Salmonella infection, independent of the serovar used for the challenge and the time post infection. However, expressions of all interleukins, iNOS and Ex-FABP showed that protection against homologous serovars was significantly higher than against heterologous serovars after intravenous challenge at 4 days post infection. The vaccination with a mixture of S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium SPI1 mutants induced an intermediate protection against challenge with both serovars, i.e. the mixed vaccine provided an additional protective effect when compared with the chickens vaccinated with a vaccine formed by only a single Salmonella serovar.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a protilátky bakteriální $x krev $x imunologie $7 D000907
650    _2
$a chemokiny $x imunologie $7 D018925
650    _2
$a kur domácí $x imunologie $7 D002645
650    12
$a zkřížená ochrana $7 D056738
650    _2
$a genomové ostrovy $7 D044404
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nemoci drůbeže $x imunologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011201
650    _2
$a salmonelová infekce u zvířat $x imunologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D012481
650    _2
$a salmonelové vakcíny $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D022562
650    _2
$a Salmonella enterica $x genetika $x imunologie $x patogenita $7 D019779
650    _2
$a Salmonella enteritidis $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D012477
650    _2
$a Salmonella typhimurium $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D012486
650    _2
$a vakcinace $x veterinární $7 D014611
650    _2
$a atenuované vakcíny $x genetika $x imunologie $7 D014613
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Havlickova, Hana $u -
700    1_
$a Sisak, Frantisek $u -
700    1_
$a Babak, Vladimir $u -
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u -
773    0_
$w MED00004631 $t Vaccine $x 1873-2518 $g Roč. 31, č. 31 (2013), s. 3156-62
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23684831 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140401 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140410103810 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1018206 $s 849650
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 31 $c 31 $d 3156-62 $i 1873-2518 $m Vaccine $n Vaccine $x MED00004631
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140401

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...