-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparative study on human and bovine AT-SC isolation methods
AH. Reshak, MM. Shahimin, F. Buang,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
- MeSH
- Cell Differentiation MeSH
- Cell Culture Techniques methods MeSH
- Species Specificity MeSH
- Stem Cells cytology physiology MeSH
- Cells, Cultured MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cell Separation methods MeSH
- Cattle MeSH
- Tissue Engineering methods MeSH
- Adipocytes cytology physiology MeSH
- Cell Survival physiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Cattle MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Mammalian adipose tissue derived stem cells (AT-SC) have a tremendous potential in regenerative medicine for tissue engineering and somatic nuclear transfer (SNT). The isolation methods of human and bovine adipose tissue derived stem cells are compared in this paper to determine the feasibility and optimum method of isolation. The optimum isolation method will reduce the processing time, efforts and money as isolation is the first crucial and important step in stem cells research. Human abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue and bovine abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue are digested in three collagenase type 1 concentration 0.075%, 0.3% and 0.6% agitated at 1 h and 2 h under 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator. The cultures are then morphologically characterised. Human adipose tissue stem cells are found to be best isolated using abdominal subcutaneous depot, using 0.075% collagenase type 1 agitated at 1 h under 37 °C in CO2 incubator. While bovine adipose tissue derived stem cells are best isolated using abdominal subcutaneous depot, using 0.6% collagenase type 1 agitated at 2 h under 37 °C in CO2 incubator.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14063929
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140710101431.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140704s2013 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2013.09.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24080186
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Reshak, A H $u Institute of Complex systems, FFPW, CENAKVA, University of South Bohemia in CB, Nove Hrady 37333, Czech Republic; Center of Excellence Geopolymer and Green Technology, School of Material Engineering, University Malaysia Perlis, 01007 Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia. Electronic address: maalidph@yahoo.co.uk.
- 245 10
- $a Comparative study on human and bovine AT-SC isolation methods / $c AH. Reshak, MM. Shahimin, F. Buang,
- 520 9_
- $a Mammalian adipose tissue derived stem cells (AT-SC) have a tremendous potential in regenerative medicine for tissue engineering and somatic nuclear transfer (SNT). The isolation methods of human and bovine adipose tissue derived stem cells are compared in this paper to determine the feasibility and optimum method of isolation. The optimum isolation method will reduce the processing time, efforts and money as isolation is the first crucial and important step in stem cells research. Human abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue and bovine abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue are digested in three collagenase type 1 concentration 0.075%, 0.3% and 0.6% agitated at 1 h and 2 h under 37 °C in 5% CO2 incubator. The cultures are then morphologically characterised. Human adipose tissue stem cells are found to be best isolated using abdominal subcutaneous depot, using 0.075% collagenase type 1 agitated at 1 h under 37 °C in CO2 incubator. While bovine adipose tissue derived stem cells are best isolated using abdominal subcutaneous depot, using 0.6% collagenase type 1 agitated at 2 h under 37 °C in CO2 incubator.
- 650 _2
- $a tukové buňky $x cytologie $x fyziologie $7 D017667
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a skot $7 D002417
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné kultury $x metody $7 D018929
- 650 _2
- $a buněčná diferenciace $7 D002454
- 650 _2
- $a separace buněk $x metody $7 D002469
- 650 _2
- $a viabilita buněk $x fyziologie $7 D002470
- 650 _2
- $a kultivované buňky $7 D002478
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a druhová specificita $7 D013045
- 650 _2
- $a kmenové buňky $x cytologie $x fyziologie $7 D013234
- 650 _2
- $a tkáňové inženýrství $x metody $7 D023822
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Shahimin, M M
- 700 1_
- $a Buang, F
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003923 $t Progress in biophysics and molecular biology $x 1873-1732 $g Roč. 113, č. 2 (2013), s. 295-8
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24080186 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140710101723 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1031413 $s 862661
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2013 $b 113 $c 2 $d 295-8 $i 1873-1732 $m Progress in biophysics and molecular biology $n Prog Biophys Mol Biol $x MED00003923
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140704