-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Functionalized ultra-low fouling carboxy- and hydroxy-functional surface platforms: functionalization capacity, biorecognition capability and resistance to fouling from undiluted biological media
H. Vaisocherová, V. Ševců, P. Adam, B. Špačková, K. Hegnerová, A. de los Santos Pereira, C. Rodriguez-Emmenegger, T. Riedel, M. Houska, E. Brynda, J. Homola,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
- MeSH
- adsorpce MeSH
- akrylamidy chemie MeSH
- Escherichia coli izolace a purifikace MeSH
- limita detekce MeSH
- mléko mikrobiologie MeSH
- polyhydroxyethylmethakrylát chemie MeSH
- polymery chemie MeSH
- povrchová plasmonová rezonance metody MeSH
- povrchové vlastnosti MeSH
- sulfhydrylové sloučeniny chemie MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. MeSH
The non-specific binding of non-target species to functionalized surfaces of biosensors continues to be challenge for biosensing in real-world media. Three different low-fouling and functionalizable surface platforms were employed to study the effect of functionalization on fouling resistance from several types of undiluted media including blood plasma and food media. The surface platforms investigated in this work included two polymer brushes: hydroxy-functional poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) and carboxy-functional poly(carboxybetaine acrylamide) (pCBAA), and a standard OEG-based carboxy-functional alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayer (AT-SAM). The wet and dry polymer brushes were analyzed by AFM, ellipsometry, FT-IRRAS, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The surfaces were functionalized by the covalent attachment of antibodies, streptavidin, and oligonucleotides and the binding and biorecognition characteristics of the coatings were compared. We found that functionalization did not substantially affect the ultra-low fouling properties of pCBAA (plasma fouling of ~20 ng/cm(2)), a finding in contrast with pHEMA that completely lost its resistance to fouling after the activation of hydroxyl groups. Blocking a functionalized AT-SAM covalently with BSA decreased fouling down to the level comparable to unblocked pCBAA. However, the biorecognition capability of blocked functionalized AT-SAM was poor in comparison with functionalized pCBAA. Limits of detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in undiluted milk were determined to be 6×10(4), 8×10(5), and 6×10(5) cells/ml for pCBAA, pHEMA, and AT-SAM-blocked, respectively. Effect of analyte size on biorecognition activity of functionalized coatings was investigated and it was shown that the best performance in terms of overall fouling resistance and biorecognition capability is provided by pCBAA.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc14064031
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20140707125636.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 140704s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.bios.2013.07.015 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23954672
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Vaisocherová, Hana $u Institute of Photonics and Electronics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Chaberská 57, 18251 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Functionalized ultra-low fouling carboxy- and hydroxy-functional surface platforms: functionalization capacity, biorecognition capability and resistance to fouling from undiluted biological media / $c H. Vaisocherová, V. Ševců, P. Adam, B. Špačková, K. Hegnerová, A. de los Santos Pereira, C. Rodriguez-Emmenegger, T. Riedel, M. Houska, E. Brynda, J. Homola,
- 520 9_
- $a The non-specific binding of non-target species to functionalized surfaces of biosensors continues to be challenge for biosensing in real-world media. Three different low-fouling and functionalizable surface platforms were employed to study the effect of functionalization on fouling resistance from several types of undiluted media including blood plasma and food media. The surface platforms investigated in this work included two polymer brushes: hydroxy-functional poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (pHEMA) and carboxy-functional poly(carboxybetaine acrylamide) (pCBAA), and a standard OEG-based carboxy-functional alkanethiolate self-assembled monolayer (AT-SAM). The wet and dry polymer brushes were analyzed by AFM, ellipsometry, FT-IRRAS, and surface plasmon resonance (SPR). The surfaces were functionalized by the covalent attachment of antibodies, streptavidin, and oligonucleotides and the binding and biorecognition characteristics of the coatings were compared. We found that functionalization did not substantially affect the ultra-low fouling properties of pCBAA (plasma fouling of ~20 ng/cm(2)), a finding in contrast with pHEMA that completely lost its resistance to fouling after the activation of hydroxyl groups. Blocking a functionalized AT-SAM covalently with BSA decreased fouling down to the level comparable to unblocked pCBAA. However, the biorecognition capability of blocked functionalized AT-SAM was poor in comparison with functionalized pCBAA. Limits of detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in undiluted milk were determined to be 6×10(4), 8×10(5), and 6×10(5) cells/ml for pCBAA, pHEMA, and AT-SAM-blocked, respectively. Effect of analyte size on biorecognition activity of functionalized coatings was investigated and it was shown that the best performance in terms of overall fouling resistance and biorecognition capability is provided by pCBAA.
- 650 _2
- $a akrylamidy $x chemie $7 D000178
- 650 _2
- $a adsorpce $7 D000327
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Escherichia coli $x izolace a purifikace $7 D004926
- 650 _2
- $a limita detekce $7 D057230
- 650 _2
- $a mléko $x mikrobiologie $7 D008892
- 650 _2
- $a polyhydroxyethylmethakrylát $x chemie $7 D011102
- 650 _2
- $a polymery $x chemie $7 D011108
- 650 _2
- $a sulfhydrylové sloučeniny $x chemie $7 D013438
- 650 _2
- $a povrchová plasmonová rezonance $x metody $7 D020349
- 650 _2
- $a povrchové vlastnosti $7 D013499
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. $7 D013486
- 700 1_
- $a Ševců, Veronika
- 700 1_
- $a Adam, Pavel $7 gn_A_00001119
- 700 1_
- $a Špačková, Barbora
- 700 1_
- $a Hegnerová, Kateřina
- 700 1_
- $a de los Santos Pereira, Andres
- 700 1_
- $a Rodriguez-Emmenegger, Cesar
- 700 1_
- $a Riedel, Tomáš
- 700 1_
- $a Houska, Milan
- 700 1_
- $a Brynda, Eduard
- 700 1_
- $a Homola, Jiří
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006627 $t Biosensors & bioelectronics $x 1873-4235 $g Roč. 51, č. - (2014), s. 150-7
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23954672 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20140704 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20140707125924 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1031515 $s 862763
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 51 $c - $d 150-7 $i 1873-4235 $m Biosensors & bioelectronics $n Biosens Bioelectron $x MED00006627
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20140704