Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Plant trait assembly affects superiority of grazer's foraging strategies in species-rich grasslands

J. Mládek, P. Mládková, P. Hejcmanová, M. Dvorský, V. Pavlu, F. De Bello, M. Duchoslav, M. Hejcman, RJ. Pakeman,

. 2013 ; 8 (7) : e69800.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

BACKGROUND: Current plant--herbivore interaction models and experiments with mammalian herbivores grazing plant monocultures show the superiority of a maximizing forage quality strategy (MFQ) over a maximizing intake strategy (MI). However, there is a lack of evidence whether grazers comply with the model predictions under field conditions. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: We assessed diet selection of sheep (Ovis aries) using plant functional traits in productive mesic vs. low-productivity dry species-rich grasslands dominated by resource-exploitative vs. resource-conservative species respectively. Each grassland type was studied in two replicates for two years. We investigated the first grazing cycle in a set of 288 plots with a diameter of 30 cm, i.e. the size of sheep feeding station. In mesic grasslands, high plot defoliation was associated with community weighted means of leaf traits referring to high forage quality, i.e. low leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and high specific leaf area (SLA), with a high proportion of legumes and the most with high community weighted mean of forage indicator value. In contrast in dry grasslands, high community weighted mean of canopy height, an estimate of forage quantity, was the best predictor of plot defoliation. Similar differences in selection on forage quality vs. quantity were detected within plots. Sheep selected plants with higher forage indicator values than the plot specific community weighted mean of forage indicator value in mesic grasslands whereas taller plants were selected in dry grasslands. However, at this scale sheep avoided legumes and plants with higher SLA, preferred plants with higher LDMC while grazing plants with higher forage indicator values in mesic grasslands. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that MFQ appears superior over MI only in habitats with a predominance of resource-exploitative species. Furthermore, plant functional traits (LDMC, SLA, nitrogen fixer) seem to be helpful correlates of forage quality only at the community level.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc14064062
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20140707113519.0
007      
ta
008      
140704s2013 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0069800 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)23922805
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mládek, Jan $u Department of Botany, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. jan.mladek@upol.cz
245    10
$a Plant trait assembly affects superiority of grazer's foraging strategies in species-rich grasslands / $c J. Mládek, P. Mládková, P. Hejcmanová, M. Dvorský, V. Pavlu, F. De Bello, M. Duchoslav, M. Hejcman, RJ. Pakeman,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Current plant--herbivore interaction models and experiments with mammalian herbivores grazing plant monocultures show the superiority of a maximizing forage quality strategy (MFQ) over a maximizing intake strategy (MI). However, there is a lack of evidence whether grazers comply with the model predictions under field conditions. METHODOLOGY/FINDINGS: We assessed diet selection of sheep (Ovis aries) using plant functional traits in productive mesic vs. low-productivity dry species-rich grasslands dominated by resource-exploitative vs. resource-conservative species respectively. Each grassland type was studied in two replicates for two years. We investigated the first grazing cycle in a set of 288 plots with a diameter of 30 cm, i.e. the size of sheep feeding station. In mesic grasslands, high plot defoliation was associated with community weighted means of leaf traits referring to high forage quality, i.e. low leaf dry matter content (LDMC) and high specific leaf area (SLA), with a high proportion of legumes and the most with high community weighted mean of forage indicator value. In contrast in dry grasslands, high community weighted mean of canopy height, an estimate of forage quantity, was the best predictor of plot defoliation. Similar differences in selection on forage quality vs. quantity were detected within plots. Sheep selected plants with higher forage indicator values than the plot specific community weighted mean of forage indicator value in mesic grasslands whereas taller plants were selected in dry grasslands. However, at this scale sheep avoided legumes and plants with higher SLA, preferred plants with higher LDMC while grazing plants with higher forage indicator values in mesic grasslands. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that MFQ appears superior over MI only in habitats with a predominance of resource-exploitative species. Furthermore, plant functional traits (LDMC, SLA, nitrogen fixer) seem to be helpful correlates of forage quality only at the community level.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a dieta $7 D004032
650    12
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a býložravci $x fyziologie $7 D060434
650    _2
$a lineární modely $7 D016014
650    _2
$a lipnicovité $x fyziologie $7 D006109
650    12
$a kvantitativní znak dědičný $7 D019655
650    _2
$a ovce $x fyziologie $7 D012756
650    _2
$a druhová specificita $7 D013045
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Mládková, Pavla
700    1_
$a Hejcmanová, Pavla
700    1_
$a Dvorský, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Pavlu, Vilém
700    1_
$a De Bello, Francesco
700    1_
$a Duchoslav, Martin
700    1_
$a Hejcman, Michal
700    1_
$a Pakeman, Robin J
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 8, č. 7 (2013), s. e69800
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23922805 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20140704 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20140707113807 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1031546 $s 862794
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2013 $b 8 $c 7 $d e69800 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20140704

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...