-
Something wrong with this record ?
Surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis: a comparison of two methods
J. Včelák, J. Chomiak, L. Toth,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1997 to 2014-03-31
PubMed Central
from 1997 to 2014
Europe PubMed Central
from 1997 to 2014
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2007-02-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Lumbar Vertebrae surgery MeSH
- Discitis surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
PURPOSE: This study evaluates two basic hypotheses: (1) the risk of an isolated dorsal approach to ventral lumbar spondylodiscitis based on clinical and radiographic results and (2) the risk of anterior radical debridement due to using a titanium implant in the site of bone infection. METHODS: Group A consisting of 23 patients was treated only by a dorsal transmuscular approach and group B consisting of eight patients was treated by two-stage posteroanterior surgery. Both evaluated groups were assessed before surgery, six weeks and one year after surgery with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria. To evaluate the sagittal balance restoration, measurement by the Cobb modified angle of the affected segment was performed. RESULTS: Differences (p < 0.001) in group A were found between JOA values before surgery (average 9.30) and at six weeks after surgery (average 11.82) and 12 months after surgery (13.27) and VAS differences before surgery (average 7.39), six weeks after surgery (average 3.82) and 12 months after surgery (average 2.36) in group A. According to the Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria, 11 patients were evaluated as excellent, nine patients as good and two patients as poor. The values of the JOA score in group B showed an improvement compared with the JOA values before surgery (average 9.38) at six weeks after surgery (average 11.75) and 12 months after surgery (average 13.63), and the VAS score before surgery (average 7.38) was found to have improved six weeks after surgery (average 4.63) and 12 months after surgery (average 2.25). The functional evaluation according to the Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria assessed three patients as excellent, four patients as good and one patient as fair. Radiographic examinations of group A revealed the following findings before surgery (average 1.75), six months after surgery (average -3.73) and 12 months after surgery (average -0.79) and in group B before surgery (average 3.71), six weeks after surgery (average -8.21) and 12 months after surgery (average -6.45). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the minimum serious surgical complications and greater loss of sagittal balance without clinical correlation in group A. We did not find any relapse or persistence of the infection in the post-operative period in group B.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008045
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150325113314.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150306s2014 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00264-014-2360-8 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24859896
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Včelák, Josef $u Department of Orthopedics, 1st Medical Faculty of Charles University and Hospital Na Bulovce, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Surgical treatment of lumbar spondylodiscitis: a comparison of two methods / $c J. Včelák, J. Chomiak, L. Toth,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: This study evaluates two basic hypotheses: (1) the risk of an isolated dorsal approach to ventral lumbar spondylodiscitis based on clinical and radiographic results and (2) the risk of anterior radical debridement due to using a titanium implant in the site of bone infection. METHODS: Group A consisting of 23 patients was treated only by a dorsal transmuscular approach and group B consisting of eight patients was treated by two-stage posteroanterior surgery. Both evaluated groups were assessed before surgery, six weeks and one year after surgery with the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria. To evaluate the sagittal balance restoration, measurement by the Cobb modified angle of the affected segment was performed. RESULTS: Differences (p < 0.001) in group A were found between JOA values before surgery (average 9.30) and at six weeks after surgery (average 11.82) and 12 months after surgery (13.27) and VAS differences before surgery (average 7.39), six weeks after surgery (average 3.82) and 12 months after surgery (average 2.36) in group A. According to the Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria, 11 patients were evaluated as excellent, nine patients as good and two patients as poor. The values of the JOA score in group B showed an improvement compared with the JOA values before surgery (average 9.38) at six weeks after surgery (average 11.75) and 12 months after surgery (average 13.63), and the VAS score before surgery (average 7.38) was found to have improved six weeks after surgery (average 4.63) and 12 months after surgery (average 2.25). The functional evaluation according to the Kirkaldy-Willis functional criteria assessed three patients as excellent, four patients as good and one patient as fair. Radiographic examinations of group A revealed the following findings before surgery (average 1.75), six months after surgery (average -3.73) and 12 months after surgery (average -0.79) and in group B before surgery (average 3.71), six weeks after surgery (average -8.21) and 12 months after surgery (average -6.45). CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the minimum serious surgical complications and greater loss of sagittal balance without clinical correlation in group A. We did not find any relapse or persistence of the infection in the post-operative period in group B.
- 650 _2
- $a discitida $x chirurgie $7 D015299
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a bederní obratle $x chirurgie $7 D008159
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Chomiak, Jiří
- 700 1_
- $a Toth, Ladislav
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002384 $t International orthopaedics $x 1432-5195 $g Roč. 38, č. 7 (2014), s. 1425-34
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24859896 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150306 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150325113603 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1065318 $s 890845
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 38 $c 7 $d 1425-34 $i 1432-5195 $m International orthopaedics $n Int Orthop $x MED00002384
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150306