-
Something wrong with this record ?
Pseudomonas biofilms: possibilities of their control
J. Masák, A. Čejková, O. Schreiberová, T. Rezanka,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review
NLK
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2006-01-01 to 2014-12-31
Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
from 1985-02-01
- MeSH
- Anti-Bacterial Agents pharmacology MeSH
- Drug Resistance, Bacterial MeSH
- Biofilms * MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Plant Diseases microbiology MeSH
- Pseudomonas Infections drug therapy microbiology prevention & control MeSH
- Pseudomonas drug effects physiology MeSH
- Soil Microbiology MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Review MeSH
Genus Pseudomonas includes a large number of species that can be encountered in biotechnological processes as well as in the role of serious human or plant pathogens. Pseudomonads easily form biofilms on various types of surfaces. The biofilm phenotype is characterized by an increased resistance to environmental influences including resistance to antibiotics and other disinfectants, causing a number of problems in health care, food industry, and other areas. Considerable attention is therefore paid to the possibilities of eradication/destruction of pseudomonads biofilms both in terms of understanding the mechanisms of biofilm formation and at the level of finding suitable antibiofilm tools applicable in practice. The first part of this review is devoted to an overview of the regulatory mechanisms that are directly or indirectly involved in the formation of biofilm. The most effective approaches to suppressing the formation of biofilm that do not cause the development of resistance are based on the application of substances that interfere with the regulatory molecules or block the appropriate regulatory mechanisms involved in biofilm development by the cells. Pseudomonads biofilm formation is, similar to other microorganisms, a sophisticated process with many regulatory elements. The suppression of this process therefore also requires multiple antibiofilm tools.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008090
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150325100722.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150306s2014 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/1574-6941.12344 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24754832
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Masák, Jan $u Department of Biotechnology, Institute of Chemical Technology Prague, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Pseudomonas biofilms: possibilities of their control / $c J. Masák, A. Čejková, O. Schreiberová, T. Rezanka,
- 520 9_
- $a Genus Pseudomonas includes a large number of species that can be encountered in biotechnological processes as well as in the role of serious human or plant pathogens. Pseudomonads easily form biofilms on various types of surfaces. The biofilm phenotype is characterized by an increased resistance to environmental influences including resistance to antibiotics and other disinfectants, causing a number of problems in health care, food industry, and other areas. Considerable attention is therefore paid to the possibilities of eradication/destruction of pseudomonads biofilms both in terms of understanding the mechanisms of biofilm formation and at the level of finding suitable antibiofilm tools applicable in practice. The first part of this review is devoted to an overview of the regulatory mechanisms that are directly or indirectly involved in the formation of biofilm. The most effective approaches to suppressing the formation of biofilm that do not cause the development of resistance are based on the application of substances that interfere with the regulatory molecules or block the appropriate regulatory mechanisms involved in biofilm development by the cells. Pseudomonads biofilm formation is, similar to other microorganisms, a sophisticated process with many regulatory elements. The suppression of this process therefore also requires multiple antibiofilm tools.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $7 D000900
- 650 12
- $a biofilmy $7 D018441
- 650 _2
- $a bakteriální léková rezistence $7 D024881
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci rostlin $x mikrobiologie $7 D010935
- 650 _2
- $a Pseudomonas $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D011549
- 650 _2
- $a pseudomonádové infekce $x farmakoterapie $x mikrobiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D011552
- 650 _2
- $a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Čejková, Alena
- 700 1_
- $a Schreiberová, Olga
- 700 1_
- $a Rezanka, Tomáš
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001790 $t FEMS microbiology ecology $x 1574-6941 $g Roč. 89, č. 1 (2014), s. 1-14
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24754832 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150306 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150325101011 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1065363 $s 890890
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 89 $c 1 $d 1-14 $i 1574-6941 $m FEMS microbiology ecology $n FEMS Microbiol Ecol $x MED00001790
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150306