Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Memory for expectation-violating concepts: the effects of agents and cultural familiarity

M. Porubanova, DJ. Shaw, R. McKay, D. Xygalatas,

. 2014 ; 9 (4) : e90684.

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc15008113

Previous research has shown that ideas which violate our expectations, such as schema-inconsistent concepts, enjoy privileged status in terms of memorability. In our study, memory for concepts that violate cultural (cultural schema-level) expectations (e.g., "illiterate teacher", "wooden bottle", or "thorny grass") versus domain-level (ontological) expectations (e.g., "speaking cat", "jumping maple", or "melting teacher") was examined. Concepts that violate cultural expectations, or counter-schematic, were remembered to a greater extent compared with concepts that violate ontological expectations and with intuitive concepts (e.g., "galloping pony", "drying orchid", or "convertible car"), in both immediate recall, and delayed recognition tests. Importantly, concepts related to agents showed a memory advantage over concepts not pertaining to agents, but this was true only for expectation-violating concepts. Our results imply that intuitive, everyday concepts are equally attractive and memorable regardless of the presence or absence of agents. However, concepts that violate our expectations (cultural-schema or domain-level) are more memorable when pertaining to agents (humans and animals) than to non-agents (plants or objects/artifacts). We conclude that due to their evolutionary salience, cultural ideas which combine expectancy violations and the involvement of an agent are especially memorable and thus have an enhanced probability of being successfully propagated.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008113
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150306133153.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0090684 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24714568
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Porubanova, Michaela $u Department of Psychology, Farmingdale State College, Farmingdale, New York, United States of America; Laboratory for the Experimental Study of Religion, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Memory for expectation-violating concepts: the effects of agents and cultural familiarity / $c M. Porubanova, DJ. Shaw, R. McKay, D. Xygalatas,
520    9_
$a Previous research has shown that ideas which violate our expectations, such as schema-inconsistent concepts, enjoy privileged status in terms of memorability. In our study, memory for concepts that violate cultural (cultural schema-level) expectations (e.g., "illiterate teacher", "wooden bottle", or "thorny grass") versus domain-level (ontological) expectations (e.g., "speaking cat", "jumping maple", or "melting teacher") was examined. Concepts that violate cultural expectations, or counter-schematic, were remembered to a greater extent compared with concepts that violate ontological expectations and with intuitive concepts (e.g., "galloping pony", "drying orchid", or "convertible car"), in both immediate recall, and delayed recognition tests. Importantly, concepts related to agents showed a memory advantage over concepts not pertaining to agents, but this was true only for expectation-violating concepts. Our results imply that intuitive, everyday concepts are equally attractive and memorable regardless of the presence or absence of agents. However, concepts that violate our expectations (cultural-schema or domain-level) are more memorable when pertaining to agents (humans and animals) than to non-agents (plants or objects/artifacts). We conclude that due to their evolutionary salience, cultural ideas which combine expectancy violations and the involvement of an agent are especially memorable and thus have an enhanced probability of being successfully propagated.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a pozornost $7 D001288
650    _2
$a biologická evoluce $7 D005075
650    _2
$a kultura $7 D003469
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    12
$a paměť $7 D008568
650    _2
$a rozpomínání $7 D011939
650    _2
$a pravděpodobnost $7 D011336
650    _2
$a rozpoznávání (psychologie) $7 D021641
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Shaw, Daniel Joel $u Social and Behavioural Neuroscience Research Group, Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a McKay, Ryan $u ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, and Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Xygalatas, Dimitris $u Laboratory for the Experimental Study of Religion, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic; Interacting Minds Centre, Department of Culture and Society, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 9, č. 4 (2014), s. e90684
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24714568 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150306133424 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065386 $s 890913
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 9 $c 4 $d e90684 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options