-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review
B. Mašková, M. Rožánek, O. Gajdoš, E. Karnoub, V. Kamenský, G. Donin
Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
Grantová podpora
SGS23/198/OHK4/3T/17
Czech Technical University in Prague
SGS22/132/OHK4/2T/17
Czech Technical University in Prague
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of low magnetic induction devices with less than 1 T, referred to as Low-Field MRI (LF MRI). LF MRI systems were used, especially in the early days of magnetic resonance technology. Over time, magnetic induction values of 1.5 and 3 T have become the standard for clinical devices, mainly because LF MRI systems were suffering from significantly lower quality of the images, e.g., signal-noise ratio. In recent years, due to advances in image processing with artificial intelligence, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of LF MRI with induction of less than 1 T. This overview article focuses on the analysis of the evidence concerning the diagnostic efficacy of modern LF MRI systems and the clinical comparison of LF MRI with 1.5 T systems in imaging the nervous system, musculoskeletal system, and organs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for the period 2018-2023 was performed according to the recommended PRISMA protocol. Data were analysed to identify studies comparing the accuracy, reliability and diagnostic performance of LF MRI technology compared to available 1.5 T MRI. RESULTS: A total of 1275 publications were retrieved from the selected databases. Only two articles meeting all predefined inclusion criteria were selected for detailed assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of robust studies on the accuracy and diagnostic performance of LF MRI compared with 1.5 T MRI was available. The current evidence is not sufficient to draw any definitive insights. More scientific research is needed to make informed conclusions regarding the effectiveness of LF MRI technology.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc24018203
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20241016081903.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 241008s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/diagnostics14141564 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)39061702
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Mašková, Barbora $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review / $c B. Mašková, M. Rožánek, O. Gajdoš, E. Karnoub, V. Kamenský, G. Donin
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of low magnetic induction devices with less than 1 T, referred to as Low-Field MRI (LF MRI). LF MRI systems were used, especially in the early days of magnetic resonance technology. Over time, magnetic induction values of 1.5 and 3 T have become the standard for clinical devices, mainly because LF MRI systems were suffering from significantly lower quality of the images, e.g., signal-noise ratio. In recent years, due to advances in image processing with artificial intelligence, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of LF MRI with induction of less than 1 T. This overview article focuses on the analysis of the evidence concerning the diagnostic efficacy of modern LF MRI systems and the clinical comparison of LF MRI with 1.5 T systems in imaging the nervous system, musculoskeletal system, and organs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for the period 2018-2023 was performed according to the recommended PRISMA protocol. Data were analysed to identify studies comparing the accuracy, reliability and diagnostic performance of LF MRI technology compared to available 1.5 T MRI. RESULTS: A total of 1275 publications were retrieved from the selected databases. Only two articles meeting all predefined inclusion criteria were selected for detailed assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of robust studies on the accuracy and diagnostic performance of LF MRI compared with 1.5 T MRI was available. The current evidence is not sufficient to draw any definitive insights. More scientific research is needed to make informed conclusions regarding the effectiveness of LF MRI technology.
- 590 __
- $a NEINDEXOVÁNO
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Rožánek, Martin $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000254857240
- 700 1_
- $a Gajdoš, Ondřej $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163943733
- 700 1_
- $a Karnoub, Evgeniia $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Kamenský, Vojtěch $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Donin, Gleb $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000337865932 $7 xx0219312
- 773 0_
- $w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 14, č. 14 (2024)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39061702 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20241008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20241016081859 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 2196492 $s 1230154
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
- BMC __
- $a 2024 $b 14 $c 14 $e 20240719 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics (Basel) $x MED00195450
- GRA __
- $a SGS23/198/OHK4/3T/17 $p Czech Technical University in Prague
- GRA __
- $a SGS22/132/OHK4/2T/17 $p Czech Technical University in Prague
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20241008