• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review

B. Mašková, M. Rožánek, O. Gajdoš, E. Karnoub, V. Kamenský, G. Donin

. 2024 ; 14 (14) : . [pub] 20240719

Status neindexováno Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc24018203

Grantová podpora
SGS23/198/OHK4/3T/17 Czech Technical University in Prague
SGS22/132/OHK4/2T/17 Czech Technical University in Prague

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of low magnetic induction devices with less than 1 T, referred to as Low-Field MRI (LF MRI). LF MRI systems were used, especially in the early days of magnetic resonance technology. Over time, magnetic induction values of 1.5 and 3 T have become the standard for clinical devices, mainly because LF MRI systems were suffering from significantly lower quality of the images, e.g., signal-noise ratio. In recent years, due to advances in image processing with artificial intelligence, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of LF MRI with induction of less than 1 T. This overview article focuses on the analysis of the evidence concerning the diagnostic efficacy of modern LF MRI systems and the clinical comparison of LF MRI with 1.5 T systems in imaging the nervous system, musculoskeletal system, and organs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for the period 2018-2023 was performed according to the recommended PRISMA protocol. Data were analysed to identify studies comparing the accuracy, reliability and diagnostic performance of LF MRI technology compared to available 1.5 T MRI. RESULTS: A total of 1275 publications were retrieved from the selected databases. Only two articles meeting all predefined inclusion criteria were selected for detailed assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of robust studies on the accuracy and diagnostic performance of LF MRI compared with 1.5 T MRI was available. The current evidence is not sufficient to draw any definitive insights. More scientific research is needed to make informed conclusions regarding the effectiveness of LF MRI technology.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc24018203
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20241016081903.0
007      
ta
008      
241008s2024 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/diagnostics14141564 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)39061702
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Mašková, Barbora $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
245    10
$a Assessment of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Systematic Review / $c B. Mašková, M. Rožánek, O. Gajdoš, E. Karnoub, V. Kamenský, G. Donin
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of low magnetic induction devices with less than 1 T, referred to as Low-Field MRI (LF MRI). LF MRI systems were used, especially in the early days of magnetic resonance technology. Over time, magnetic induction values of 1.5 and 3 T have become the standard for clinical devices, mainly because LF MRI systems were suffering from significantly lower quality of the images, e.g., signal-noise ratio. In recent years, due to advances in image processing with artificial intelligence, there has been an increasing effort to take advantage of the potential use of LF MRI with induction of less than 1 T. This overview article focuses on the analysis of the evidence concerning the diagnostic efficacy of modern LF MRI systems and the clinical comparison of LF MRI with 1.5 T systems in imaging the nervous system, musculoskeletal system, and organs of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. METHODOLOGY: A systematic literature review of MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases for the period 2018-2023 was performed according to the recommended PRISMA protocol. Data were analysed to identify studies comparing the accuracy, reliability and diagnostic performance of LF MRI technology compared to available 1.5 T MRI. RESULTS: A total of 1275 publications were retrieved from the selected databases. Only two articles meeting all predefined inclusion criteria were selected for detailed assessment. CONCLUSIONS: A limited number of robust studies on the accuracy and diagnostic performance of LF MRI compared with 1.5 T MRI was available. The current evidence is not sufficient to draw any definitive insights. More scientific research is needed to make informed conclusions regarding the effectiveness of LF MRI technology.
590    __
$a NEINDEXOVÁNO
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a přehledy $7 D016454
700    1_
$a Rožánek, Martin $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000254857240
700    1_
$a Gajdoš, Ondřej $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000163943733
700    1_
$a Karnoub, Evgeniia $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Kamenský, Vojtěch $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic
700    1_
$a Donin, Gleb $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, 272 01 Kladno, Czech Republic $1 https://orcid.org/0000000337865932 $7 xx0219312
773    0_
$w MED00195450 $t Diagnostics $x 2075-4418 $g Roč. 14, č. 14 (2024)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39061702 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y - $z 0
990    __
$a 20241008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20241016081859 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 2196492 $s 1230154
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC-PubMed-not-MEDLINE
BMC    __
$a 2024 $b 14 $c 14 $e 20240719 $i 2075-4418 $m Diagnostics $n Diagnostics (Basel) $x MED00195450
GRA    __
$a SGS23/198/OHK4/3T/17 $p Czech Technical University in Prague
GRA    __
$a SGS22/132/OHK4/2T/17 $p Czech Technical University in Prague
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20241008

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...