• Something wrong with this record ?

Comparison of various techniques for the extraction and determination of antioxidants in plants

P. Bajerová, M. Adam, T. Bajer, K. Ventura,

. 2014 ; 37 (7) : 835-44.

Language English Country Germany

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

The following extraction techniques have been used for extracting antioxidants (apigenin, coumarin, esculetin, umbelliferone, bergapten, quercetin, rutin, scopoletin and xanthotoxin) from plant material: supercritical fluid extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, extraction by means of Soxhlet apparatus, ultrasonic extraction in ultrasonic bath, and by means of ultrasonic probe. The analytical method based on HPLC-UV detection for the determination of selected antioxidants was developed. For all extracts the antioxidant capacity based on the reduction of free 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical was also determined. Comparing all results the ultrasonic probe method using 0.75 g of sample extracted by 50 mL of acetonitrile in water (30%, v/v) for 25 min at room temperature and with amplitude at 60% (equal to 90 W) without pulsation was evaluated as the best tool. The most significant indicator demonstrating this statement is the antioxidant capacity expressed as gallic acid equivalent where the ultrasonic probe method showed the best results in 10 of 16 samples. Also the operability of ultrasonic probe extraction method compared to other tested methods is more favorable.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc15008362
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20150330115056.0
007      
ta
008      
150306s2014 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jssc.201301139 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)24470390
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Bajerová, Petra $u University of Pardubice, Faculty of Chemical Technology, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Comparison of various techniques for the extraction and determination of antioxidants in plants / $c P. Bajerová, M. Adam, T. Bajer, K. Ventura,
520    9_
$a The following extraction techniques have been used for extracting antioxidants (apigenin, coumarin, esculetin, umbelliferone, bergapten, quercetin, rutin, scopoletin and xanthotoxin) from plant material: supercritical fluid extraction, pressurized liquid extraction, extraction by means of Soxhlet apparatus, ultrasonic extraction in ultrasonic bath, and by means of ultrasonic probe. The analytical method based on HPLC-UV detection for the determination of selected antioxidants was developed. For all extracts the antioxidant capacity based on the reduction of free 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical was also determined. Comparing all results the ultrasonic probe method using 0.75 g of sample extracted by 50 mL of acetonitrile in water (30%, v/v) for 25 min at room temperature and with amplitude at 60% (equal to 90 W) without pulsation was evaluated as the best tool. The most significant indicator demonstrating this statement is the antioxidant capacity expressed as gallic acid equivalent where the ultrasonic probe method showed the best results in 10 of 16 samples. Also the operability of ultrasonic probe extraction method compared to other tested methods is more favorable.
650    _2
$a antioxidancia $x analýza $7 D000975
650    _2
$a vysokoúčinná kapalinová chromatografie $7 D002851
650    12
$a superkritická fluidní chromatografie $7 D025924
650    _2
$a rostlinné extrakty $x analýza $7 D010936
650    _2
$a listy rostlin $x chemie $7 D018515
650    _2
$a rostliny $x chemie $7 D010944
650    _2
$a spektrofotometrie ultrafialová $7 D013056
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Adam, Martin $7 xx0064600
700    1_
$a Bajer, Tomáš
700    1_
$a Ventura, Karel
773    0_
$w MED00006463 $t Journal of separation science $x 1615-9314 $g Roč. 37, č. 7 (2014), s. 835-44
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24470390 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20150306 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20150330115325 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1065635 $s 891162
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2014 $b 37 $c 7 $d 835-44 $i 1615-9314 $m Journal of separation science $n J Sep Sci $x MED00006463
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20150306

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...