-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Biphasic alveolosquamoid renal carcinoma: a histomorphological, immunohistochemical, molecular genetic, and ultrastructural study of a distinctive morphologic variant of renal cell carcinoma
F. Petersson, S. Bulimbasic, O. Hes, P. Slavik, P. Martínek, M. Michal, B. Gomolčáková, M. Hora, I. Damjanov,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu kazuistiky, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NT12010
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
- MeSH
- chromozomální aberace MeSH
- diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
- hybridizace in situ fluorescenční MeSH
- imunohistochemie MeSH
- karcinom z renálních buněk genetika metabolismus patologie ultrastruktura MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery metabolismus MeSH
- nádory ledvin genetika metabolismus patologie ultrastruktura MeSH
- následné studie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- srovnávací genomová hybridizace MeSH
- ztráta heterozygozity MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- kazuistiky MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
Only a few cases of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) with squamous differentiation have been published. We present 2 RCCs exhibiting a hitherto not reported biphasic neoplastic cell population exhibiting a predominantly alveolar architecture where squamoid differentiation was identified in one of the neoplastic cell populations. None of the tumors showed chromophobe features or any evidence of sarcomatoid transformation. The tumors arose in 2 adult patients and were characterized by routine histology, immunohistochemistry, ultrastructure, array comparative genomic hybridization, confirmatory fluorescent in situ hybridization, and loss of heterozygosity analysis. Tumors measured 3 and 4 cm and were located within the renal parenchyma and had no pelvicalyceal connection. Both tumors were composed of a distinctly dual-cell population. The larger tumor cells displayed squamoid features and formed round well-demarcated solid alveolated islands that, in large parts, were surrounded by a smaller neoplastic cell component. The squamoid cells were immunoreactive for cytokeratins (CKs) (AE1-AE3, Cam 5.2, CK5/6, CK7, and CK20), epithelial membrane antigen, racemase/AMACR, and carboanhydrase IX (in 1 case focally). The small cell population was positive for CK7, epithelial membrane antigen, and racemase/AMACR, whereas CK20, AE1-3, and carboanhydrase IX were negative. CD10 was focally positive in the large squamoid cells in 1 case. Cathepsin K, E-cadherin, and CD117 displayed focal positivity in 1 case. Vimentin, RCC marker, parvalbumin, S100 protein, S100 A1, p63, p53, CDX2, uroplakin III, HMB45, TFE3, WT1, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, thyroglobulin, and TTF1 were negative. The proliferative activity (Ki-67) was low (1%) in the small cell component in both cases, whereas the large neoplastic tumor cells displayed a significantly higher proliferation (20%-35%). Ultrastructurally, desmosomes and tonofilaments were identified in the large tumor cells, confirming squamoid differentiation in a subset of tumor cells. Array comparative genomic hybridization of 1 analyzable case (confirmed with fluorescent in situ hybridization and loss of heterozygosity analysis) revealed partial or complete losses of chromosomes 2, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 22, (including biallelic loss of CDKN2A locus) and partial gains of chromosomes 1, 5, 11, 12 and 13. Follow-up at 6 years showed no recurrence or metastasis in 1 patient. The other (male) patients had a subcutaneous metastasis at presentation, but during a 1-year follow-up no evidence of recurrence or further metastatic events have been documented. Our data indicate that biphasic alveolosquamoid renal carcinoma is a unique and distinctive tumor. The large squamoid and small tumor cells have overlapping but still distinctive immunohistochemical patterns of protein expression. Multiple chromosomal aberrations were identified, some of them located in regions with known tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15008644
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181121103657.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150306s2012 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2012.08.007 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23036259
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Petersson, Fredrik $u Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague-Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Biphasic alveolosquamoid renal carcinoma: a histomorphological, immunohistochemical, molecular genetic, and ultrastructural study of a distinctive morphologic variant of renal cell carcinoma / $c F. Petersson, S. Bulimbasic, O. Hes, P. Slavik, P. Martínek, M. Michal, B. Gomolčáková, M. Hora, I. Damjanov,
- 520 9_
- $a Only a few cases of sarcomatoid renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) with squamous differentiation have been published. We present 2 RCCs exhibiting a hitherto not reported biphasic neoplastic cell population exhibiting a predominantly alveolar architecture where squamoid differentiation was identified in one of the neoplastic cell populations. None of the tumors showed chromophobe features or any evidence of sarcomatoid transformation. The tumors arose in 2 adult patients and were characterized by routine histology, immunohistochemistry, ultrastructure, array comparative genomic hybridization, confirmatory fluorescent in situ hybridization, and loss of heterozygosity analysis. Tumors measured 3 and 4 cm and were located within the renal parenchyma and had no pelvicalyceal connection. Both tumors were composed of a distinctly dual-cell population. The larger tumor cells displayed squamoid features and formed round well-demarcated solid alveolated islands that, in large parts, were surrounded by a smaller neoplastic cell component. The squamoid cells were immunoreactive for cytokeratins (CKs) (AE1-AE3, Cam 5.2, CK5/6, CK7, and CK20), epithelial membrane antigen, racemase/AMACR, and carboanhydrase IX (in 1 case focally). The small cell population was positive for CK7, epithelial membrane antigen, and racemase/AMACR, whereas CK20, AE1-3, and carboanhydrase IX were negative. CD10 was focally positive in the large squamoid cells in 1 case. Cathepsin K, E-cadherin, and CD117 displayed focal positivity in 1 case. Vimentin, RCC marker, parvalbumin, S100 protein, S100 A1, p63, p53, CDX2, uroplakin III, HMB45, TFE3, WT1, synaptophysin, chromogranin A, thyroglobulin, and TTF1 were negative. The proliferative activity (Ki-67) was low (1%) in the small cell component in both cases, whereas the large neoplastic tumor cells displayed a significantly higher proliferation (20%-35%). Ultrastructurally, desmosomes and tonofilaments were identified in the large tumor cells, confirming squamoid differentiation in a subset of tumor cells. Array comparative genomic hybridization of 1 analyzable case (confirmed with fluorescent in situ hybridization and loss of heterozygosity analysis) revealed partial or complete losses of chromosomes 2, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 22, (including biallelic loss of CDKN2A locus) and partial gains of chromosomes 1, 5, 11, 12 and 13. Follow-up at 6 years showed no recurrence or metastasis in 1 patient. The other (male) patients had a subcutaneous metastasis at presentation, but during a 1-year follow-up no evidence of recurrence or further metastatic events have been documented. Our data indicate that biphasic alveolosquamoid renal carcinoma is a unique and distinctive tumor. The large squamoid and small tumor cells have overlapping but still distinctive immunohistochemical patterns of protein expression. Multiple chromosomal aberrations were identified, some of them located in regions with known tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a karcinom z renálních buněk $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $x ultrastruktura $7 D002292
- 650 _2
- $a chromozomální aberace $7 D002869
- 650 _2
- $a srovnávací genomová hybridizace $7 D055028
- 650 _2
- $a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a následné studie $7 D005500
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunohistochemie $7 D007150
- 650 _2
- $a hybridizace in situ fluorescenční $7 D017404
- 650 _2
- $a nádory ledvin $x genetika $x metabolismus $x patologie $x ultrastruktura $7 D007680
- 650 _2
- $a ztráta heterozygozity $7 D019656
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x metabolismus $7 D014408
- 655 _2
- $a kazuistiky $7 D002363
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Bulimbasic, Stela
- 700 1_
- $a Hes, Ondřej, $d 1968- $7 jn20001103502
- 700 1_
- $a Slavik, Pavol
- 700 1_
- $a Martínek, Petr $7 xx0243624
- 700 1_
- $a Michal, Michal, $d 1959- $7 jn20001103501
- 700 1_
- $a Gomolčáková, Barbora
- 700 1_
- $a Hora, Milan, $d 1967- $7 mzk2004258359
- 700 1_
- $a Damjanov, Ivan
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166541 $t Annals of diagnostic pathology $x 1532-8198 $g Roč. 16, č. 6 (2012), s. 459-469
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23036259 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150306 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181121103753 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1065917 $s 891444
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2012 $b 16 $c 6 $d 459-469 $i 1532-8198 $m Annals of diagnostic pathology $n Ann. diagn. pathol. $x MED00166541
- GRA __
- $a NT12010 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150306