-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Criterion validity of the self-report dysphagia assessment tool EAT-10 among neurological patients
Petra Mandysová, Jana Fialová, Edvard Ehler, Arnošt Pellant
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium elektronický zdroj
Typ dokumentu práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
NT13725
MZ0
CEP - Centrální evidence projektů
Digitální knihovna NLK
Plný text - Článek
Zdroj
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2014
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
Open Access Digital Library
od 2014-01-01
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
od 2014-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2014
- MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nemoci mozku komplikace MeSH
- ošetřovatelská diagnóza * klasifikace MeSH
- polykání MeSH
- poruchy polykání * diagnóza prevence a kontrola MeSH
- průřezové studie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků * MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- statistika jako téma MeSH
- zpráva o sobě MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Aim: The aim was to study criterion validity of the Czech version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by comparing it with the Nursing Dysphagia Screening Tool (NDST). Moreover, the aim was to compare three items of the EAT-10 that focused on swallowing liquids (EAT3) and solids (EAT4) and on cough while eating (EAT9) with one item of the NDST, the swallow test (NDST8). Design: The design was cross-sectional. Methods: The sample included 57 hospitalized patients with a neurological condition. Their swallowing function was assessed using the EAT-10 and NDST. The relationship between the dichotomized EAT-10 and NDST and the selected items of both tools was expressed using the association coefficient phi (φ). Results: For all the studied EAT-10 cut-off scores, the relationship between the EAT-10 and NDST was negative; it was the strongest for a cut-off score of 15 (phi = -0.795; p <0.001). In all but one case, the relationship between the three items of the EAT-10 and the NDST8 was negative; it was the strongest for EAT3 (cut-off score of 3; phi = -0.701; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results do not provide evidence for criterion validity of the EAT-10 using the NDST. Further research is recommended.
Department of Neurology Pardubice Regional Hospital Czech Republic
Faculty of Health Studies University of Pardubice Czech Republic
Criterion validity of the self-report dysphagia assessment tool EAT-10 among neurological patients [elektronický zdroj] /
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15010790
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191114090150.0
- 007
- cr|cn|
- 008
- 150323s2014 xr fs 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.15452/CEJNM.2014.05.0009 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Mandysová, Petra $7 xx0085709 $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology, Pardubice Regional Hospital, Czech Republic
- 245 10
- $a Criterion validity of the self-report dysphagia assessment tool EAT-10 among neurological patients $h [elektronický zdroj] / $c Petra Mandysová, Jana Fialová, Edvard Ehler, Arnošt Pellant
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a Aim: The aim was to study criterion validity of the Czech version of the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) by comparing it with the Nursing Dysphagia Screening Tool (NDST). Moreover, the aim was to compare three items of the EAT-10 that focused on swallowing liquids (EAT3) and solids (EAT4) and on cough while eating (EAT9) with one item of the NDST, the swallow test (NDST8). Design: The design was cross-sectional. Methods: The sample included 57 hospitalized patients with a neurological condition. Their swallowing function was assessed using the EAT-10 and NDST. The relationship between the dichotomized EAT-10 and NDST and the selected items of both tools was expressed using the association coefficient phi (φ). Results: For all the studied EAT-10 cut-off scores, the relationship between the EAT-10 and NDST was negative; it was the strongest for a cut-off score of 15 (phi = -0.795; p <0.001). In all but one case, the relationship between the three items of the EAT-10 and the NDST8 was negative; it was the strongest for EAT3 (cut-off score of 3; phi = -0.701; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The results do not provide evidence for criterion validity of the EAT-10 using the NDST. Further research is recommended.
- 650 12
- $a ošetřovatelská diagnóza $x klasifikace $7 D009733
- 650 12
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 12
- $a poruchy polykání $x diagnóza $x prevence a kontrola $7 D003680
- 650 _2
- $a polykání $7 D003679
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nemoci mozku $x komplikace $7 D001927
- 650 _2
- $a zpráva o sobě $7 D057566
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Fialová, Jana $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Ehler, Edvard $7 xx0001425 $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology, Pardubice Regional Hospital, Czech Republic
- 700 1_
- $a Pellant, Arnošt, $d 1943- $7 jk01092497 $u Faculty of Health Studies, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic; Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Surgery of the Head and Neck, Pardubice Regional Hospital, Czech Republic
- 773 0_
- $t Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x 2336-3517 $g Roč. 5, č. 4 (2014), s. 137-144 $w MED00183333
- 856 41
- $u http://periodika.osu.cz/cejnm/dok/2014-04/1-mandysov-fialova-ehler-pellant.pdf $y plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $y 4 $b online $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150322104933 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191114090428 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1068269 $s 893628
- BAS __
- $a 3 $a 4
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 5 $c 4 $d 137-144 $i 2336-3517 $m Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery $x MED00183333
- GRA __
- $a NT13725 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $c NLK121 $d 20151207 $a NLK 2015-16/vt