-
Something wrong with this record ?
Three-dimensional imaging methods for quantitative analysis of facial soft tissues and skeletal morphology in patients with orofacial clefts: a systematic review
MA. Kuijpers, YT. Chiu, RM. Nada, CE. Carels, PS. Fudalej,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Review
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Medical Records Systems, Computerized * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Face pathology MeSH
- Facial Bones pathology MeSH
- PubMed MeSH
- Cleft Palate pathology MeSH
- Cleft Lip pathology MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods MeSH
- Dental Casting Technique MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for evaluating cleft palate treatments are mostly based on two-dimensional (2D) evaluation, but three-dimensional (3D) imaging methods to assess treatment outcome are steadily rising. OBJECTIVE: To identify 3D imaging methods for quantitative assessment of soft tissue and skeletal morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate. DATA SOURCES: Literature was searched using PubMed (1948-2012), EMBASE (1980-2012), Scopus (2004-2012), Web of Science (1945-2012), and the Cochrane Library. The last search was performed September 30, 2012. Reference lists were hand searched for potentially eligible studies. There was no language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: We included publications using 3D imaging techniques to assess facial soft tissue or skeletal morphology in patients older than 5 years with a cleft lip with/or without cleft palate. We reviewed studies involving the facial region when at least 10 subjects in the sample size had at least one cleft type. Only primary publications were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent extraction of data and quality assessments were performed by two observers. RESULTS: Five hundred full text publications were retrieved, 144 met the inclusion criteria, with 63 high quality studies. There were differences in study designs, topics studied, patient characteristics, and success measurements; therefore, only a systematic review could be conducted. Main 3D-techniques that are used in cleft lip and palate patients are CT, CBCT, MRI, stereophotogrammetry, and laser surface scanning. These techniques are mainly used for soft tissue analysis, evaluation of bone grafting, and changes in the craniofacial skeleton. Digital dental casts are used to evaluate treatment and changes over time. CONCLUSION: Available evidence implies that 3D imaging methods can be used for documentation of CLP patients. No data are available yet showing that 3D methods are more informative than conventional 2D methods. Further research is warranted to elucidate it.
Cleft Palate Craniofacial Unit Radboud University Medical Centre Nijmegen The Netherlands
Department of Dentistry and Craniofacial Center Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Taipei Taiwan
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics University of Bern Bern Switzerland
Department of Orthodontics Palacky University Olomouc Olomouc Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15023498
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20150709122910.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 150709s2014 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0093442 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24710215
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kuijpers, Mette A R $u Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Cleft Palate Craniofacial Unit, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- 245 10
- $a Three-dimensional imaging methods for quantitative analysis of facial soft tissues and skeletal morphology in patients with orofacial clefts: a systematic review / $c MA. Kuijpers, YT. Chiu, RM. Nada, CE. Carels, PS. Fudalej,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for evaluating cleft palate treatments are mostly based on two-dimensional (2D) evaluation, but three-dimensional (3D) imaging methods to assess treatment outcome are steadily rising. OBJECTIVE: To identify 3D imaging methods for quantitative assessment of soft tissue and skeletal morphology in patients with cleft lip and palate. DATA SOURCES: Literature was searched using PubMed (1948-2012), EMBASE (1980-2012), Scopus (2004-2012), Web of Science (1945-2012), and the Cochrane Library. The last search was performed September 30, 2012. Reference lists were hand searched for potentially eligible studies. There was no language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: We included publications using 3D imaging techniques to assess facial soft tissue or skeletal morphology in patients older than 5 years with a cleft lip with/or without cleft palate. We reviewed studies involving the facial region when at least 10 subjects in the sample size had at least one cleft type. Only primary publications were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Independent extraction of data and quality assessments were performed by two observers. RESULTS: Five hundred full text publications were retrieved, 144 met the inclusion criteria, with 63 high quality studies. There were differences in study designs, topics studied, patient characteristics, and success measurements; therefore, only a systematic review could be conducted. Main 3D-techniques that are used in cleft lip and palate patients are CT, CBCT, MRI, stereophotogrammetry, and laser surface scanning. These techniques are mainly used for soft tissue analysis, evaluation of bone grafting, and changes in the craniofacial skeleton. Digital dental casts are used to evaluate treatment and changes over time. CONCLUSION: Available evidence implies that 3D imaging methods can be used for documentation of CLP patients. No data are available yet showing that 3D methods are more informative than conventional 2D methods. Further research is warranted to elucidate it.
- 650 _2
- $a rozštěp rtu $x patologie $7 D002971
- 650 _2
- $a rozštěp patra $x patologie $7 D002972
- 650 _2
- $a zubní odlitky - technika $7 D003735
- 650 _2
- $a obličej $x patologie $7 D005145
- 650 _2
- $a obličejové kosti $x patologie $7 D005147
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
- 650 12
- $a chorobopisy - počítačové systémy $7 D016347
- 650 _2
- $a PubMed $7 D039781
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Chiu, Yu-Ting $u Department of Dentistry and Craniofacial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
- 700 1_
- $a Nada, Rania M $u Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Carels, Carine E L $u Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Cleft Palate Craniofacial Unit, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Fudalej, Piotr S $u Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Bern Switzerland; Department of Orthodontics, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 9, č. 4 (2014), s. e93442
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24710215 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20150709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20150709122929 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1083835 $s 906491
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 9 $c 4 $d e93442 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20150709