-
Something wrong with this record ?
Anatomické poznámky k miniinvazivní dlahové osteosyntéze proximálního humeru - kadaverózní studie
[Anatomy notes on minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. A cadaver study]
M. Křivohlávek, S. Taller, R. Lukáš, P. Dráč
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
Document type English Abstract, Journal Article
PubMed
24755059
- MeSH
- Axilla innervation MeSH
- Humeral Fractures * diagnosis surgery MeSH
- Outcome Assessment, Health Care MeSH
- Humerus pathology physiopathology MeSH
- Bone Plates MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures adverse effects instrumentation methods MeSH
- Intraoperative Complications prevention & control MeSH
- Peripheral Nerve Injuries * etiology prevention & control MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal * adverse effects instrumentation methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- English Abstract MeSH
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to assess the average length of a proximal and a distal incision, to verify the location of the axillary nerve and to identify risk factors for nerve injury during minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During cadaver study a total of 24 implantations using the Philos angular stable plate were performed from the minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A five-hole plate inserted with the aid of new Philos aiming device was used in all cases. The plate was fixed with four screws proximally and with three screws to the diaphysis. After implantation either of the incisions were joined and the axillary nerve was exposed on the lateral side of the arm. RESULTS: The nerve was not found to be injured during plate implantation in any of the cases. The average length of the proximal incision was 56 ± 2.8 mm (52-64 mm) and that of the distal incision was 32 ± 2.5 mm (28-35 mm). The middle free part covering the axillary nerve was on average 45 ± 4.3 mm (38-54) long. The average width of the nerve was 1.9 ± 0.35 mm (1.4-2.8 mm). The average distance of the axillary nerve was 39 ± 2.9 mm (37-44 mm) from the superior facet of the greater tubercle and 53 ± 3.9 mm (48-60) from the lower edge of the acromial process. In 80% of the cases the nerve was located in the area determined for the screws going to the medial calcar region; in 20% it was over a hole for the screw directed towards the centre of humeral head. Nerve location above the first six most proximally placed screws was not recorded in any of the cases. DISCUSSION: The minimally invasive anterolateral approach is an alternative technique for osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures using angular stable plates. Advantages reported by a number of authors include lower incidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, an easier way of reduction and a better view of the rotator cuff. On the other hand, this approach is associated with a higher risk of damage to the axillary nerve. Distance of axillary nerve from acromion is very variable. It may be located in the range of 30 to 85 mm from the acromial edge. CONCLUSION: The anterolateral approach is, when respecting the anatomical position of the axillary nerve, a safe alternative to the conventional deltoideopectoral approach.
Anatomy notes on minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. A cadaver study
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15030937
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20151016071348.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151001s2014 xr a f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2014/007
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24755059
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Křivohlávek, Martin $7 xx0081916 $u Traumatologicko-ortopedické centrum se spinální jednotkou, Krajská Nemocnice Liberec
- 245 10
- $a Anatomické poznámky k miniinvazivní dlahové osteosyntéze proximálního humeru - kadaverózní studie / $c M. Křivohlávek, S. Taller, R. Lukáš, P. Dráč
- 246 31
- $a Anatomy notes on minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus. A cadaver study
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The aim of the study was to assess the average length of a proximal and a distal incision, to verify the location of the axillary nerve and to identify risk factors for nerve injury during minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: During cadaver study a total of 24 implantations using the Philos angular stable plate were performed from the minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A five-hole plate inserted with the aid of new Philos aiming device was used in all cases. The plate was fixed with four screws proximally and with three screws to the diaphysis. After implantation either of the incisions were joined and the axillary nerve was exposed on the lateral side of the arm. RESULTS: The nerve was not found to be injured during plate implantation in any of the cases. The average length of the proximal incision was 56 ± 2.8 mm (52-64 mm) and that of the distal incision was 32 ± 2.5 mm (28-35 mm). The middle free part covering the axillary nerve was on average 45 ± 4.3 mm (38-54) long. The average width of the nerve was 1.9 ± 0.35 mm (1.4-2.8 mm). The average distance of the axillary nerve was 39 ± 2.9 mm (37-44 mm) from the superior facet of the greater tubercle and 53 ± 3.9 mm (48-60) from the lower edge of the acromial process. In 80% of the cases the nerve was located in the area determined for the screws going to the medial calcar region; in 20% it was over a hole for the screw directed towards the centre of humeral head. Nerve location above the first six most proximally placed screws was not recorded in any of the cases. DISCUSSION: The minimally invasive anterolateral approach is an alternative technique for osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures using angular stable plates. Advantages reported by a number of authors include lower incidence of avascular necrosis of the humeral head, an easier way of reduction and a better view of the rotator cuff. On the other hand, this approach is associated with a higher risk of damage to the axillary nerve. Distance of axillary nerve from acromion is very variable. It may be located in the range of 30 to 85 mm from the acromial edge. CONCLUSION: The anterolateral approach is, when respecting the anatomical position of the axillary nerve, a safe alternative to the conventional deltoideopectoral approach.
- 650 _2
- $a axila $x inervace $7 D001365
- 650 _2
- $a kostní destičky $7 D001860
- 650 12
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a fraktury humeru $x diagnóza $x chirurgie $7 D006810
- 650 _2
- $a humerus $x patologie $x patofyziologie $7 D006811
- 650 _2
- $a peroperační komplikace $x prevence a kontrola $7 D007431
- 650 _2
- $a miniinvazivní chirurgické výkony $x škodlivé účinky $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D019060
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče $7 D017063
- 650 12
- $a poranění periferního nervu $x etiologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D059348
- 655 _2
- $a anglický abstrakt $7 D004740
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Taller, Stanislav, $d 1941- $7 nlk20020105998 $u Traumatologicko-ortopedické centrum se spinální jednotkou, Krajská Nemocnice Liberec
- 700 1_
- $a Lukáš, Richard, $d 1953- $7 xx0000167 $u Traumatologicko-ortopedické centrum se spinální jednotkou, Krajská Nemocnice Liberec
- 700 1_
- $a Dráč, Pavel $7 xx0047405 $u Traumacentrum FN Olomouc
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 81, č. 1 (2014), s. 63-69
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151001 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20151015090120 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1094190 $s 914053
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 81 $c 1 $d 63-69 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20151001