-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Non-invasive evaluation of proximal vertebral artery stenosis using color Doppler sonography and CT angiography
O. Škoda, P. Kalvach, B. Procházka, M. Svárovský,
Jazyk angličtina Země Francie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, hodnotící studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- angiografie metody MeSH
- digitální subtrakční angiografie metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- multimodální zobrazování metody MeSH
- počítačová rentgenová tomografie metody MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- ultrasonografie dopplerovská barevná metody MeSH
- vertebrobazilární insuficience diagnóza MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A reliable and safe diagnostic procedure for vertebral artery (VA) stenosis is needed, but none is generally accepted yet. In our study, we evaluated symptomatic VA stenoses using color Doppler sonography (CDS). CT angiography (CTA) has been employed as a non-invasive reference method. Next, we tested the accuracy for medium to high degree stenoses by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two symptomatic patients with a proximal VA stenosis were examined prospectively with CDS and CTA. The VA diameters by both methods were correlated. The stenotic peak systolic velocity (PSV1) and its ratio to the post-stenotic segment (PSVr) were analysed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Cut-off values for PSV1 and PSVr defining moderate and severe stenosis were assessed. In stenoses≥50%, an additional search for correlation with DSA was carried out. RESULTS: Mean VA diameter was 3.561mm (95% CI 3.361-3.760) by CDS and 4.180 (95% CI, 3.950-4.411) by CTA, accompanied with significant similarity in Pearson' correlation (0.847, P<0.001). The PSV1 and PSVr appeared to be equally accurate for VA stenoses of 50% or more (PSV 1-AUC 0.814, P<0.001, cut-off velocity≥1.35m/s, PSVr-AUC 0.819, P<0.001 with a cut-off value≥2.2). Final Spearman' correlation of CTA results vs DSA was highly significant (0.823, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results endorse the non-invasive combination of CDS with CTA in the evaluation of VA stenosis as a reliable diagnostic algorithm, tightly correlating with DSA.
Department of neurology 3rd Medical Faculty Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Neurology General hospital Vrchlického 59 58633 Jihlava Czech Republic
Department of Radiology General Hospital Jihlava Czech Republic
State Health Institute and 3rd Medical Faculty Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc15032076
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20171127121454.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 151005s2014 fr f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.neurad.2013.11.003 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)24388394
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a fr
- 100 1_
- $a Škoda, Ondřej $u Department of neurology, 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology, General hospital, Vrchlického 59, 58633 Jihlava, Czech Republic. Electronic address: osk@seznam.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Non-invasive evaluation of proximal vertebral artery stenosis using color Doppler sonography and CT angiography / $c O. Škoda, P. Kalvach, B. Procházka, M. Svárovský,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A reliable and safe diagnostic procedure for vertebral artery (VA) stenosis is needed, but none is generally accepted yet. In our study, we evaluated symptomatic VA stenoses using color Doppler sonography (CDS). CT angiography (CTA) has been employed as a non-invasive reference method. Next, we tested the accuracy for medium to high degree stenoses by digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two symptomatic patients with a proximal VA stenosis were examined prospectively with CDS and CTA. The VA diameters by both methods were correlated. The stenotic peak systolic velocity (PSV1) and its ratio to the post-stenotic segment (PSVr) were analysed using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Cut-off values for PSV1 and PSVr defining moderate and severe stenosis were assessed. In stenoses≥50%, an additional search for correlation with DSA was carried out. RESULTS: Mean VA diameter was 3.561mm (95% CI 3.361-3.760) by CDS and 4.180 (95% CI, 3.950-4.411) by CTA, accompanied with significant similarity in Pearson' correlation (0.847, P<0.001). The PSV1 and PSVr appeared to be equally accurate for VA stenoses of 50% or more (PSV 1-AUC 0.814, P<0.001, cut-off velocity≥1.35m/s, PSVr-AUC 0.819, P<0.001 with a cut-off value≥2.2). Final Spearman' correlation of CTA results vs DSA was highly significant (0.823, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results endorse the non-invasive combination of CDS with CTA in the evaluation of VA stenosis as a reliable diagnostic algorithm, tightly correlating with DSA.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a angiografie $x metody $7 D000792
- 650 _2
- $a digitální subtrakční angiografie $x metody $7 D015901
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a multimodální zobrazování $x metody $7 D064847
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
- 650 _2
- $a ultrasonografie dopplerovská barevná $x metody $7 D018615
- 650 _2
- $a vertebrobazilární insuficience $x diagnóza $7 D014715
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kalvach, Pavel $u Department of neurology, 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Procházka, Bohumír, $d 1953-2017 $7 xx0075077 $u State Health Institute and 3rd Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Svárovský, Martin $u Department of Radiology, General Hospital, Jihlava, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002839 $t Journal of neuroradiology. Journal de neuroradiologie $x 0150-9861 $g Roč. 41, č. 5 (2014), s. 336-41
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24388394 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20151005 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20171127121621 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1092952 $s 915202
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 41 $c 5 $d 336-41 $e 20131231 $i 0150-9861 $m Journal of neuroradiology $n J Neuroradiol $x MED00002839
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20151005
