• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

L. Kappos, H. Wiendl, K. Selmaj, DL. Arnold, E. Havrdova, A. Boyko, M. Kaufman, J. Rose, S. Greenberg, M. Sweetser, K. Riester, G. O'Neill, J. Elkins,

. 2015 ; 373 (15) : 1418-28.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16000017
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Family Health Database (ProQuest) od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Health Management Database (ProQuest) od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 1980-01-03 do Před 3 měsíci

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CD25 (alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor) and modulates interleukin-2 signaling. Abnormalities in interleukin-2 signaling have been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study involving 1841 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to compare daclizumab HYP, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg every 4 weeks, with interferon beta-1a, administered intramuscularly at a dose of 30 μg once weekly, for up to 144 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (0.22 vs. 0.39; 45% lower rate with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). The number of new or newly enlarged hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a period of 96 weeks was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (4.3 vs. 9.4; 54% lower number of lesions with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). At week 144, the estimated incidence of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was 16% with daclizumab HYP and 20% with interferon beta-1a (P=0.16). Serious adverse events, excluding relapse of multiple sclerosis, were reported in 15% of the patients in the daclizumab HYP group and in 10% of those in the interferon beta-1a group. Infections were more common in the daclizumab HYP group than in the interferon beta-1a group (in 65% vs. 57% of the patients, including serious infection in 4% vs. 2%), as were cutaneous events such as rash or eczema (in 37% vs. 19%, including serious events in 2% vs. <1%) and elevations in liver aminotransferase levels that were more than 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (in 6% vs. 3%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, daclizumab HYP showed efficacy superior to that of interferon beta-1a with regard to the annualized relapse rate and lesions, as assessed by means of MRI, but was not associated with a significantly lower risk of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks. The rates of infection, rash, and abnormalities on liver-function testing were higher with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a. (Funded by Biogen and AbbVie Biotherapeutics; DECIDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01064401.).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16000017
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200121083504.0
007      
ta
008      
160108s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1056/NEJMoa1501481 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26444729
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kappos, Ludwig $u From the Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, the Departments of Medicine, Clinical Research, and Biomedicine and Biomedical Engineering, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland (L.K.); the Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany (H.W.); the Department of Neurology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland (K.S.); NeuroRx Research and Montreal Neurological Institute, McGill University - both in Montreal (D.L.A.); the Department of Neurology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic (E.H.); the Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Russian National Research Medical University, and Moscow Multiple Sclerosis Center - both in Moscow (A.B.); Cole Neurological Institute, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (M.K.); the Department of Neurology and the Neurovirology Research Laboratory, University of Utah, and the Veterans Affairs Salt Lake City Health Care System - both in Salt Lake City (J.R.); AbbVie Biotherapeutics, Redwood City, CA (S.G.); and Biogen, Cambridge, MA (M.S., K.R., G.O., J.E.).
245    10
$a Daclizumab HYP versus Interferon Beta-1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis / $c L. Kappos, H. Wiendl, K. Selmaj, DL. Arnold, E. Havrdova, A. Boyko, M. Kaufman, J. Rose, S. Greenberg, M. Sweetser, K. Riester, G. O'Neill, J. Elkins,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Daclizumab high-yield process (HYP) is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CD25 (alpha subunit of the interleukin-2 receptor) and modulates interleukin-2 signaling. Abnormalities in interleukin-2 signaling have been implicated in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and other autoimmune disorders. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase 3 study involving 1841 patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis to compare daclizumab HYP, administered subcutaneously at a dose of 150 mg every 4 weeks, with interferon beta-1a, administered intramuscularly at a dose of 30 μg once weekly, for up to 144 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS: The annualized relapse rate was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (0.22 vs. 0.39; 45% lower rate with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). The number of new or newly enlarged hyperintense lesions on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over a period of 96 weeks was lower with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a (4.3 vs. 9.4; 54% lower number of lesions with daclizumab HYP; P<0.001). At week 144, the estimated incidence of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was 16% with daclizumab HYP and 20% with interferon beta-1a (P=0.16). Serious adverse events, excluding relapse of multiple sclerosis, were reported in 15% of the patients in the daclizumab HYP group and in 10% of those in the interferon beta-1a group. Infections were more common in the daclizumab HYP group than in the interferon beta-1a group (in 65% vs. 57% of the patients, including serious infection in 4% vs. 2%), as were cutaneous events such as rash or eczema (in 37% vs. 19%, including serious events in 2% vs. <1%) and elevations in liver aminotransferase levels that were more than 5 times the upper limit of the normal range (in 6% vs. 3%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, daclizumab HYP showed efficacy superior to that of interferon beta-1a with regard to the annualized relapse rate and lesions, as assessed by means of MRI, but was not associated with a significantly lower risk of disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks. The rates of infection, rash, and abnormalities on liver-function testing were higher with daclizumab HYP than with interferon beta-1a. (Funded by Biogen and AbbVie Biotherapeutics; DECIDE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01064401.).
650    _2
$a adjuvancia imunologická $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000276
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a humanizované monoklonální protilátky $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D061067
650    _2
$a progrese nemoci $7 D018450
650    _2
$a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunoglobulin G $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D007074
650    _2
$a imunosupresiva $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D007166
650    _2
$a interferon beta 1a $7 D000068556
650    _2
$a interferon beta $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D016899
650    _2
$a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a relabující-remitující roztroušená skleróza $x farmakoterapie $7 D020529
655    _2
$a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Wiendl, Heinz
700    1_
$a Selmaj, Krzysztof
700    1_
$a Arnold, Douglas L $7 gn_A_00008706
700    1_
$a Havrdova, Eva
700    1_
$a Boyko, Alexey
700    1_
$a Kaufman, Michael
700    1_
$a Rose, John
700    1_
$a Greenberg, Steven
700    1_
$a Sweetser, Marianne
700    1_
$a Riester, Katherine
700    1_
$a O'Neill, Gilmore
700    1_
$a Elkins, Jacob
773    0_
$w MED00003517 $t The New England journal of medicine $x 1533-4406 $g Roč. 373, č. 15 (2015), s. 1418-28
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26444729 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160108 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200121083841 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1102298 $s 924223
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 373 $c 15 $d 1418-28 $i 1533-4406 $m The New England journal of medicine $n N Engl J Med $x MED00003517
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160108

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...