-
Something wrong with this record ?
Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study
MJ. Ellis, A. Llombart-Cussac, D. Feltl, JA. Dewar, M. Jasiówka, N. Hewson, Y. Rukazenkov, JF. Robertson,
Language English Country United States
Document type Clinical Trial, Phase II, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 2004 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1999-01-01
- MeSH
- Estrogen Receptor Antagonists administration & dosage MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Estradiol administration & dosage analogs & derivatives MeSH
- Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal administration & dosage MeSH
- Aromatase Inhibitors administration & dosage MeSH
- Kaplan-Meier Estimate MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Breast Neoplasms drug therapy pathology MeSH
- Nitriles administration & dosage MeSH
- Disease-Free Survival MeSH
- Drug Administration Schedule MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Triazoles administration & dosage MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Clinical Trial, Phase II MeSH
- Multicenter Study MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
PURPOSE: To compare overall survival (OS) for fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole as first-line endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Fulvestrant First-Line Study Comparing Endocrine Treatments (FIRST) was a phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had no previous therapy for advanced disease received either fulvestrant 500 mg (days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole 1 mg (daily). The primary end point (clinical benefit rate [72.5% and 67.0%]) and a follow-up analysis (median time to progression [23.4 months and 13.1 months]) have been reported previously for fulvestrant 500 mg and anastrozole, respectively. Subsequently, the protocol was amended to assess OS by unadjusted log-rank test after approximately 65% of patients had died. Treatment effect on OS across several subgroups was examined. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients were randomly assigned (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 102; anastrozole, n = 103). At data cutoff, 61.8% (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 63) and 71.8% (anastrozole, n = 74) had died. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for OS with fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole was 0.70 (0.50 to 0.98; P = .04; median OS, 54.1 months v 48.4 months). Treatment effects seemed generally consistent across the subgroups analyzed. No new safety issues were observed. CONCLUSION: There are several limitations of this OS analysis, including that it was not planned in the original protocol but instead was added after time-to-progression results were analyzed, and that not all patients participated in additional OS follow-up. However, the present results suggest fulvestrant 500 mg extends OS versus anastrozole. This finding now awaits prospective confirmation in the larger phase III FALCON (Fulvestrant and Anastrozole Compared in Hormonal Therapy Naïve Advanced Breast Cancer) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01602380).
Antonio Llombart Cussac Hospital Arnau de Vilanova Lérida Spain
David Feltl FNsP Ostrava Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic
John A Dewar Ninewells Hospital and Medical School Dundee
John F R Robertson University of Nottingham Derby United Kingdom
Marek Jasiówka Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej Curie Kraków Poland
Matthew J Ellis Baylor College of Medicine Houston TX
Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals Macclesfield
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16009962
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160414121753.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1200/JCO.2015.61.5831 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26371134
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Ellis, Matthew J $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland. Matthew.Ellis@bcm.edu.
- 245 10
- $a Fulvestrant 500 mg Versus Anastrozole 1 mg for the First-Line Treatment of Advanced Breast Cancer: Overall Survival Analysis From the Phase II FIRST Study / $c MJ. Ellis, A. Llombart-Cussac, D. Feltl, JA. Dewar, M. Jasiówka, N. Hewson, Y. Rukazenkov, JF. Robertson,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: To compare overall survival (OS) for fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole as first-line endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Fulvestrant First-Line Study Comparing Endocrine Treatments (FIRST) was a phase II, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial. Postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive, locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer who had no previous therapy for advanced disease received either fulvestrant 500 mg (days 0, 14, 28, and every 28 days thereafter) or anastrozole 1 mg (daily). The primary end point (clinical benefit rate [72.5% and 67.0%]) and a follow-up analysis (median time to progression [23.4 months and 13.1 months]) have been reported previously for fulvestrant 500 mg and anastrozole, respectively. Subsequently, the protocol was amended to assess OS by unadjusted log-rank test after approximately 65% of patients had died. Treatment effect on OS across several subgroups was examined. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse event monitoring. RESULTS: In total, 205 patients were randomly assigned (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 102; anastrozole, n = 103). At data cutoff, 61.8% (fulvestrant 500 mg, n = 63) and 71.8% (anastrozole, n = 74) had died. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for OS with fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole was 0.70 (0.50 to 0.98; P = .04; median OS, 54.1 months v 48.4 months). Treatment effects seemed generally consistent across the subgroups analyzed. No new safety issues were observed. CONCLUSION: There are several limitations of this OS analysis, including that it was not planned in the original protocol but instead was added after time-to-progression results were analyzed, and that not all patients participated in additional OS follow-up. However, the present results suggest fulvestrant 500 mg extends OS versus anastrozole. This finding now awaits prospective confirmation in the larger phase III FALCON (Fulvestrant and Anastrozole Compared in Hormonal Therapy Naïve Advanced Breast Cancer) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01602380).
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a hormonální protinádorové látky $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D018931
- 650 _2
- $a inhibitory aromatasy $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D047072
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x farmakoterapie $x patologie $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a přežití bez známek nemoci $7 D018572
- 650 _2
- $a rozvrh dávkování léků $7 D004334
- 650 _2
- $a estradiol $x aplikace a dávkování $x analogy a deriváty $7 D004958
- 650 _2
- $a antagonisté estrogenového receptoru $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D065171
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a Kaplanův-Meierův odhad $7 D053208
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a nitrily $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D009570
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a triazoly $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D014230
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze II $7 D017427
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Llombart-Cussac, Antonio $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Feltl, David $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Dewar, John A $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Jasiówka, Marek $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Hewson, Nicola $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Rukazenkov, Yuri $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Robertson, John F R $u Matthew J. Ellis, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; Antonio Llombart-Cussac, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain; David Feltl, FNsP Ostrava, Ostrava-Poruba, Czech Republic; John A. Dewar, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee; Nicola Hewson and Yuri Rukazenkov, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield; John F.R. Robertson, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom; and Marek Jasiówka, Instytut im Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Kraków, Poland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002596 $t Journal of clinical oncology official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology $x 1527-7755 $g Roč. 33, č. 32 (2015), s. 3781-7
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26371134 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160414121837 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113391 $s 934330
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 33 $c 32 $d 3781-7 $e 20150914 $i 1527-7755 $m Journal of clinical oncology $n J. clin. Oncol. $x MED00002596
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408