-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparison of visual information processing in school-age dyslexics and normal readers via motion-onset visual evoked potentials
Z. Kubová, M. Kuba, J. Kremláček, J. Langrová, J. Szanyi, F. Vít, M. Chutná,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
- MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Dyslexia physiopathology MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Sensory Thresholds physiology MeSH
- Case-Control Studies MeSH
- Motion Perception physiology MeSH
- Visual Pathways physiopathology MeSH
- Evoked Potentials, Visual physiology MeSH
- Visual Cortex physiology MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
Standard pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and motion-onset VEPs (M-VEPs) were tested in 19 dyslexics and 19 normal readers aged 7-13 years in order to evaluate the feasibility of M-VEPs for the objective diagnostics of a visual subtype of dyslexia, in which a dysfunction of the magnocellular subsystem/dorsal stream of the visual pathway is suspected. The set of VEPs consisted of the pattern-reversal VEPs with check sizes of 20', two types of translational motion (with low and high contrast) and two types of radial motion (in the full field or the periphery). While the P100 peak parameters in pattern-reversal VEPs did not differ between the group of dyslexics and controls, the group of dyslexics displayed significantly longer N2 latencies in all types of M-VEPs. Abnormal N2 latencies were found in 35-56% of dyslexics in different types of M-VEPs, with translational motion with high contrast being the most sensitive stimulation. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the latencies of M-VEPs displayed higher discrimination potential than M-VEPs amplitudes. The study confirms a "magnocellular pathway/dorsal stream deficit" in approximately half of dyslexics.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16010268
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20160412094915.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 160408s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.027 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.visres.2015.03.027 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)25913026
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Kubová, Zuzana $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kubova@lfhk.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of visual information processing in school-age dyslexics and normal readers via motion-onset visual evoked potentials / $c Z. Kubová, M. Kuba, J. Kremláček, J. Langrová, J. Szanyi, F. Vít, M. Chutná,
- 520 9_
- $a Standard pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) and motion-onset VEPs (M-VEPs) were tested in 19 dyslexics and 19 normal readers aged 7-13 years in order to evaluate the feasibility of M-VEPs for the objective diagnostics of a visual subtype of dyslexia, in which a dysfunction of the magnocellular subsystem/dorsal stream of the visual pathway is suspected. The set of VEPs consisted of the pattern-reversal VEPs with check sizes of 20', two types of translational motion (with low and high contrast) and two types of radial motion (in the full field or the periphery). While the P100 peak parameters in pattern-reversal VEPs did not differ between the group of dyslexics and controls, the group of dyslexics displayed significantly longer N2 latencies in all types of M-VEPs. Abnormal N2 latencies were found in 35-56% of dyslexics in different types of M-VEPs, with translational motion with high contrast being the most sensitive stimulation. A receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the latencies of M-VEPs displayed higher discrimination potential than M-VEPs amplitudes. The study confirms a "magnocellular pathway/dorsal stream deficit" in approximately half of dyslexics.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a studie případů a kontrol $7 D016022
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a dyslexie $x patofyziologie $7 D004410
- 650 _2
- $a zrakové evokované potenciály $x fyziologie $7 D005074
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a vnímání pohybu $x fyziologie $7 D009039
- 650 _2
- $a senzorické prahy $x fyziologie $7 D012684
- 650 _2
- $a zrakové korové centrum $x fyziologie $7 D014793
- 650 _2
- $a zrakové dráhy $x patofyziologie $7 D014795
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kuba, Miroslav $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kremláček, Jan $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Langrová, Jana $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Szanyi, Jana $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vít, František $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Chutná, Marie $u Charles University in Prague - Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004667 $t Vision research $x 1878-5646 $g Roč. 111, č. Pt A (2015), s. 97-104
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25913026 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20160408 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20160412094958 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1113697 $s 934636
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2015 $b 111 $c Pt A $d 97-104 $e 20150422 $i 1878-5646 $m Vision research $n Vision Res $x MED00004667
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20160408