Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Quality of care in European home care programs using the second generation interRAI Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs)

AD. Foebel, HP. van Hout, HG. van der Roest, E. Topinkova, V. Garms-Homolova, D. Frijters, H. Finne-Soveri, PV. Jónsson, JP. Hirdes, R. Bernabei, G. Onder,

. 2015 ; 15 (-) : 148. [pub] 20151114

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16020145

BACKGROUND: Evaluating the quality of care provided to older individuals is a key step to ensure that needs are being met and to target interventions to improve care. To this aim, interRAI's second-generation home care quality indicators (HCQIs) were developed in 2013. This study assesses the quality of home care services in six European countries using these HCQIs as well as the two derived summary scales. METHODS: Data for this study were derived from the Aged in Home Care (AdHOC) study - a cohort study that examined different models of community care in European countries. The current study selected a sub-sample of the AdHOC cohort from six countries whose follow-up data were complete (Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands). Data were collected from the interRAI Home Care instrument (RAI-HC) between 2000 and 2002. The 23 HCQIs of interest were determined according to previously established methodology, including risk adjustment. Two summary measures, the Clinical Balance Scale and Independence Quality Scale were also determined using established methodology. RESULTS: A total of 1,354 individuals from the AdHOC study were included in these analyses. Of the 23 HCQIs that were measured, the highest proportion of individuals experienced declines in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) (48.4 %). Of the clinical quality indicators, mood decline was the most prevalent (30.0 %), while no flu vaccination and being alone and distressed were the most prevalent procedural and social quality indicators, respectively (33.4 and 12.8 %). Scores on the two summary scales varied by country, but were concentrated around the median mark. CONCLUSIONS: The interRAI HCQIs can be used to determine the quality of home care services in Europe and identify areas for improvement. Our results suggest functional declines may prove the most beneficial targets for interventions.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020145
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20160726095104.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12877-015-0146-5 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12877-015-0146-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26572734
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Foebel, Andrea D $u Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden. andrea.foebel@ki.se. Department of Geriatrics, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. andrea.foebel@ki.se.
245    10
$a Quality of care in European home care programs using the second generation interRAI Home Care Quality Indicators (HCQIs) / $c AD. Foebel, HP. van Hout, HG. van der Roest, E. Topinkova, V. Garms-Homolova, D. Frijters, H. Finne-Soveri, PV. Jónsson, JP. Hirdes, R. Bernabei, G. Onder,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Evaluating the quality of care provided to older individuals is a key step to ensure that needs are being met and to target interventions to improve care. To this aim, interRAI's second-generation home care quality indicators (HCQIs) were developed in 2013. This study assesses the quality of home care services in six European countries using these HCQIs as well as the two derived summary scales. METHODS: Data for this study were derived from the Aged in Home Care (AdHOC) study - a cohort study that examined different models of community care in European countries. The current study selected a sub-sample of the AdHOC cohort from six countries whose follow-up data were complete (Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Italy and the Netherlands). Data were collected from the interRAI Home Care instrument (RAI-HC) between 2000 and 2002. The 23 HCQIs of interest were determined according to previously established methodology, including risk adjustment. Two summary measures, the Clinical Balance Scale and Independence Quality Scale were also determined using established methodology. RESULTS: A total of 1,354 individuals from the AdHOC study were included in these analyses. Of the 23 HCQIs that were measured, the highest proportion of individuals experienced declines in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) (48.4 %). Of the clinical quality indicators, mood decline was the most prevalent (30.0 %), while no flu vaccination and being alone and distressed were the most prevalent procedural and social quality indicators, respectively (33.4 and 12.8 %). Scores on the two summary scales varied by country, but were concentrated around the median mark. CONCLUSIONS: The interRAI HCQIs can be used to determine the quality of home care services in Europe and identify areas for improvement. Our results suggest functional declines may prove the most beneficial targets for interventions.
650    _2
$a činnosti denního života $7 D000203
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a stárnutí $x fyziologie $x psychologie $7 D000375
650    _2
$a kohortové studie $7 D015331
650    _2
$a etnicita $7 D005006
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a geriatrické hodnocení $x metody $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D015577
650    12
$a služby domácí péče $x organizace a řízení $x normy $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D006699
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a organizační modely $7 D017146
650    _2
$a ukazatele kvality zdravotní péče $x normy $7 D019984
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
651    _2
$a Dánsko $7 D003718
651    _2
$a Finsko $7 D005387
651    _2
$a Německo $7 D005858
651    _2
$a Itálie $7 D007558
651    _2
$a Nizozemsko $7 D009426
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a van Hout, Hein P $u Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. hpj.vanhout@vumc.nl.
700    1_
$a van der Roest, Henriëtte G $u Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. hg.vanderroest@vumc.nl.
700    1_
$a Topinkova, Eva $u Department of Geriatrics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. eva.topinkova@vfn.cz.
700    1_
$a Garms-Homolova, Vjenka $u HTW Berlin, University of Applied Sciences in Technology and Economics, Berlin, Germany. garmsho@htw-berlin.de.
700    1_
$a Frijters, Dinnus $u Department of General Practice and Elderly Care Medicine, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. d.frijters@vumc.nl.
700    1_
$a Finne-Soveri, Harriet $u National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland. harriet.finne-soveri@thl.fi.
700    1_
$a Jónsson, Pálmi V $u Department of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland. palmivj@landspitali.is.
700    1_
$a Hirdes, John P $u School of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada. hirdes@uwaterloo.ca.
700    1_
$a Bernabei, Roberto $u Department of Geriatrics, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. roberto.bernabei@rm.unicatt.it.
700    1_
$a Onder, Graziano $u Department of Geriatrics, Neuroscience and Orthopedics, Catholic University, Rome, Italy. graziano.onder@rm.unicatt.it.
773    0_
$w MED00008182 $t BMC geriatrics $x 1471-2318 $g Roč. 15, č. - (2015), s. 148
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26572734 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20160726095323 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1154815 $s 944673
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 15 $c - $d 148 $e 20151114 $i 1471-2318 $m BMC geriatrics $n BMC Geriatr $x MED00008182
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace