Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Delivery of heliox with a semi-closed circuit during spontaneous breathing: a comparative economic theoretical study

I. Jurickova, K. Roubík, M. Muller,

. 2015 ; 15 (-) : 65. [pub] 20150610

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Grant support
NT14473 MZ0 CEP Register

BACKGROUND: Heliox is a mixture of oxygen and helium which reduces airway resistance in patients with airway obstruction. In clinical practice, patients breathing spontaneously receive heliox via an open circuit. Recently, a semi-closed circuit for heliox administration has been proposed which minimizes consumption of heliox and therefore cost of the heliox therapy; although, the semi-closed circuit is associated with additional costs. The aim of the study is to conduct an economical analysis comparing total cost of heliox therapy using an open versus a semi-closed circuit in spontaneously breathing patients with airway obstruction. METHODS: Four different systems for heliox administration were analyzed: an open circuit and three alternatives of a semi-closed circuit involving a custom made semi-closed circuit and two standard anesthesia machines. Total costs of heliox therapy were calculated for all the systems. For calculation of gas consumption, the clinical procedures limiting continuous heliox therapy including the aerosol therapy, personal hygiene and nutrition were taken into account. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for main input variables that may influence the results of the study. RESULTS: Price of gases consumed by a semi-closed system represents less than 20 % of price of gases when a standard open circuit is used. This represents a saving of approximately 540 EUR per patient. The initial cost of the custom-made semi-closed circuit recuperates after treatment of 18 patients. The corresponding number of patients is 32 when a low-cost anesthesia machine is initially acquired and rises to 69 when a highly advanced anesthesia machine is considered. CONCLUSIONS: Heliox therapy in spontaneously breathing patients using a semi-closed circuit becomes more cost-effective compared to the open circuit, currently used in clinical practice, when applied in a sufficient number of cases. The impact of finding a cheaper way of heliox administration on the clinical practice needs to be ascertained.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16020696
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171205143055.0
007      
ta
008      
160722s2015 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12890-015-0060-9 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s12890-015-0060-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26059111
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Kubátová, Ivana $7 jo2014841294 $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. ivana.jurickova@fbmi.cvut.cz.
245    10
$a Delivery of heliox with a semi-closed circuit during spontaneous breathing: a comparative economic theoretical study / $c I. Jurickova, K. Roubík, M. Muller,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Heliox is a mixture of oxygen and helium which reduces airway resistance in patients with airway obstruction. In clinical practice, patients breathing spontaneously receive heliox via an open circuit. Recently, a semi-closed circuit for heliox administration has been proposed which minimizes consumption of heliox and therefore cost of the heliox therapy; although, the semi-closed circuit is associated with additional costs. The aim of the study is to conduct an economical analysis comparing total cost of heliox therapy using an open versus a semi-closed circuit in spontaneously breathing patients with airway obstruction. METHODS: Four different systems for heliox administration were analyzed: an open circuit and three alternatives of a semi-closed circuit involving a custom made semi-closed circuit and two standard anesthesia machines. Total costs of heliox therapy were calculated for all the systems. For calculation of gas consumption, the clinical procedures limiting continuous heliox therapy including the aerosol therapy, personal hygiene and nutrition were taken into account. A sensitivity analysis was conducted for main input variables that may influence the results of the study. RESULTS: Price of gases consumed by a semi-closed system represents less than 20 % of price of gases when a standard open circuit is used. This represents a saving of approximately 540 EUR per patient. The initial cost of the custom-made semi-closed circuit recuperates after treatment of 18 patients. The corresponding number of patients is 32 when a low-cost anesthesia machine is initially acquired and rises to 69 when a highly advanced anesthesia machine is considered. CONCLUSIONS: Heliox therapy in spontaneously breathing patients using a semi-closed circuit becomes more cost-effective compared to the open circuit, currently used in clinical practice, when applied in a sufficient number of cases. The impact of finding a cheaper way of heliox administration on the clinical practice needs to be ascertained.
650    _2
$a obstrukce dýchacích cest $x ekonomika $x terapie $7 D000402
650    _2
$a anesteziologický okruh $x ekonomika $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D000764
650    _2
$a náklady a analýza nákladů $7 D003365
650    _2
$a helium $x aplikace a dávkování $x ekonomika $7 D006371
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ekonomické modely $7 D018803
650    _2
$a kyslík $x aplikace a dávkování $x ekonomika $7 D010100
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Roubík, Karel, $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. roubik@fbmi.cvut.cz. $d 1971- $7 ntka173892
700    1_
$a Muller, Martin $u Department of Biomedical Technology, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. martin.muller@uvn.cz. Department of Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine Charles University in Prague and the Military University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. martin.muller@uvn.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00008206 $t BMC pulmonary medicine $x 1471-2466 $g Roč. 15, č. - (2015), s. 65
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26059111 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20160722 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171205143232 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1155366 $s 945224
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 15 $c - $d 65 $e 20150610 $i 1471-2466 $m BMC pulmonary medicine $n BMC Pulm Med $x MED00008206
GRA    __
$a NT14473 $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20160722

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...