• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry

P. Studeny, D. Krizova, J. Urminsky,

. 2015 ; 26 (3) : 230-5. [pub] 20150722

Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, pozorovací studie

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc16028239

PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery and implantation of a new accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: We evaluated the collected data of 48 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and Wichterle IOL (WIOL) implantation included in the Czech national observational registry. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for distance (CDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for near (CNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity were evaluated 6 months after surgery. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean monocular UDVA was 0.074 ± 0.108 logMAR, the mean monocular CDVA was 0.047 ± 0.125 logMAR, the mean monocular UNVA was 0.328 ± 0.146 logMAR, the mean monocular DCNVA was 0.339 ± 0.131 logMAR, and the mean monocular CNVA was 0.139 ± 0.107 logMAR. A total of 24 patients (50%) had no problems with any light phenomena. A total of 18 patients were very satisfied (37.5%), 11 were satisfied (22.9%), 15 (31.2%) were rather satisfied, 4 (8.3%) were rather dissatisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The WIOL-continuous focus polyfocal lens offers very good vision at far and intermediate distance comparable with other types of multifocal IOLs, and relatively good near vision, while the incidence of adverse side phenomena is relatively low.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc16028239
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20161021122617.0
007      
ta
008      
161005s2015 it f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5301/ejo.5000653 $2 doi
024    7_
$a 10.5301/ejo.5000653 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26350987
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a it
100    1_
$a Studeny, Pavel $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3 Medical Faculty, Prague - Czech Republic. Eye Centre SOMICH, Karlovy Vary - Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Clinical experience with the WIOL-CF accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens: Czech national observational registry / $c P. Studeny, D. Krizova, J. Urminsky,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: To assess efficacy and patient satisfaction after cataract surgery and implantation of a new accommodative bioanalogic intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: We evaluated the collected data of 48 patients with bilateral cataract surgery and Wichterle IOL (WIOL) implantation included in the Czech national observational registry. Monocular and binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for distance (CDVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity for near (CNVA), distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), and distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity were evaluated 6 months after surgery. Subjective patient satisfaction was assessed at 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean monocular UDVA was 0.074 ± 0.108 logMAR, the mean monocular CDVA was 0.047 ± 0.125 logMAR, the mean monocular UNVA was 0.328 ± 0.146 logMAR, the mean monocular DCNVA was 0.339 ± 0.131 logMAR, and the mean monocular CNVA was 0.139 ± 0.107 logMAR. A total of 24 patients (50%) had no problems with any light phenomena. A total of 18 patients were very satisfied (37.5%), 11 were satisfied (22.9%), 15 (31.2%) were rather satisfied, 4 (8.3%) were rather dissatisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied. CONCLUSIONS: The WIOL-continuous focus polyfocal lens offers very good vision at far and intermediate distance comparable with other types of multifocal IOLs, and relatively good near vision, while the incidence of adverse side phenomena is relatively low.
650    _2
$a akomodace oka $x fyziologie $7 D000065
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a brýle $7 D005139
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a implantace nitrooční čočky $7 D019654
650    12
$a nitrooční čočky $7 D007910
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a spokojenost pacientů $7 D017060
650    12
$a fakoemulzifikace $7 D018918
650    _2
$a protézy - design $7 D011474
650    _2
$a pseudofakie $x patofyziologie $7 D019591
650    12
$a registrace $7 D012042
650    _2
$a vidění binokulární $x fyziologie $7 D015348
650    _2
$a zraková ostrost $x fyziologie $7 D014792
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a pozorovací studie $7 D064888
700    1_
$a Krizova, Deli $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady and 3 Medical Faculty, Prague - Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Urminsky, Juraj $u Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital Zlin, Zlin - Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180219 $t European journal of ophthalmology $x 1724-6016 $g Roč. 26, č. 3 (2015), s. 230-5
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26350987 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20161005 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20161021123026 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1166553 $s 952869
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2015 $b 26 $c 3 $d 230-5 $e 20150722 $i 1724-6016 $m European journal of ophthalmology $n Eur J Ophthalmol $x MED00180219
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20161005

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace