-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the stomach
O. Louthan
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
- MeSH
- gastriny krev MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- míra přežití MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery krev MeSH
- nádory žaludku diagnóza patologie terapie MeSH
- neuroendokrinní nádory diagnóza patologie terapie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms of type 1 and type 3 are different entities and as such require different therapeutical strategies. The aim of this study was to define and distinguish these two tumour subtypes with clearly different biological properties and patient survival. As shown, serum gastrin is an important diagnostic tool for differentiating the less malignant type 1 "hypergastrinemia non-related" tumor from malignant type 3, along with other parameters of malignant potential such as proliferation index and depth of invasion. METHODS: The biological behaviour, tumour marker status, symptomatology, survival and therapeutical strategy were assessed and compared in 18 consecutive patients with type 1 and 7 with type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumours. RESULTS: All 18 patients with type 1 gastric carcinoids survived long-term. 17/18 patients were treated with endoscopic tumour removal. The prognosis for patients with generalized type 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms was poor, with short-term survival. No statistically significant differences between the types were found in urine 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid concentration or serum chromogranin A concentration. Significant differences were found in serum gastrin with high levels even in localized type 1 tumors and normal levels in generalized type 3 neoplasm. Further, high neuron-specific enolase levels were found in type 3. CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 tumour should be preferably treated with endoscopic tumour removal. Recently, favourable tumoristatic effects have been reported in somatostatin analogs. Surgery is a treatment option for type 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma with normal gastrinemia. Serum gastrin is suitable for assessment of the biological properties of both neuroendocrine neoplasm types. It serves, among other factors, as a predictor of prognosis and an indicator for the selection of optimal therapeutical strategy.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc16031499
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20161122150515.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 161103s2014 xr f 000 0|ENG||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2013.045 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)23817299
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a ENG
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Louthan, Oldřich, $u 4th Internal Department, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic $d 1953- $7 mzk2005318120
- 245 10
- $a Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the stomach / $c O. Louthan
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms of type 1 and type 3 are different entities and as such require different therapeutical strategies. The aim of this study was to define and distinguish these two tumour subtypes with clearly different biological properties and patient survival. As shown, serum gastrin is an important diagnostic tool for differentiating the less malignant type 1 "hypergastrinemia non-related" tumor from malignant type 3, along with other parameters of malignant potential such as proliferation index and depth of invasion. METHODS: The biological behaviour, tumour marker status, symptomatology, survival and therapeutical strategy were assessed and compared in 18 consecutive patients with type 1 and 7 with type 3 gastric neuroendocrine tumours. RESULTS: All 18 patients with type 1 gastric carcinoids survived long-term. 17/18 patients were treated with endoscopic tumour removal. The prognosis for patients with generalized type 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms was poor, with short-term survival. No statistically significant differences between the types were found in urine 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid concentration or serum chromogranin A concentration. Significant differences were found in serum gastrin with high levels even in localized type 1 tumors and normal levels in generalized type 3 neoplasm. Further, high neuron-specific enolase levels were found in type 3. CONCLUSIONS: Type 1 tumour should be preferably treated with endoscopic tumour removal. Recently, favourable tumoristatic effects have been reported in somatostatin analogs. Surgery is a treatment option for type 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma with normal gastrinemia. Serum gastrin is suitable for assessment of the biological properties of both neuroendocrine neoplasm types. It serves, among other factors, as a predictor of prognosis and an indicator for the selection of optimal therapeutical strategy.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x krev $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a gastriny $x krev $7 D005755
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neuroendokrinní nádory $x diagnóza $x patologie $x terapie $7 D018358
- 650 _2
- $a prognóza $7 D011379
- 650 _2
- $a nádory žaludku $x diagnóza $x patologie $x terapie $7 D013274
- 650 _2
- $a míra přežití $7 D015996
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacky, Olomouc, Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 158, č. 3 (2014), s. 455-460
- 856 41
- $u http://biomed.papers.upol.cz/ $y domovská stránka časopisu
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y 4 $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20161103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20161122150508 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1173632 $s 956165
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2014 $b 158 $c 3 $d 455-460 $e 20130627 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20161103