-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Relationship Between the Electroglottographic Signal and Vocal Fold Contact Area
V. Hampala, M. Garcia, JG. Švec, RC. Scherer, CT. Herbst,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
- MeSH
- audiovizuální záznam MeSH
- biomechanika MeSH
- elektrodiagnostika metody MeSH
- fonace * MeSH
- hlasové řasy anatomie a histologie fyziologie MeSH
- laryngoskopie * MeSH
- počítačové zpracování signálu MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- vibrace MeSH
- vysoká zvěř MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Electroglottography (EGG) is a widely used noninvasive method that purports to measure changes in relative vocal fold contact area (VFCA) during phonation. Despite its broad application, the putative direct relation between the EGG waveform and VFCA has to date only been formally tested in a single study, suggesting an approximately linear relationship. However, in that study, flow-induced vocal fold (VF) vibration was not investigated. A rigorous empirical evaluation of EGG as a measure of VFCA under proper physiological conditions is therefore still needed. METHODS/DESIGN: Three red deer larynges were phonated in an excised hemilarynx preparation using a conducting glass plate. The time-varying contact between the VF and the glass plate was assessed by high-speed video recordings at 6000 fps, synchronized to the EGG signal. RESULTS: The average differences between the normalized [0, 1] VFCA and EGG waveforms for the three larynges were 0.180 (±0.156), 0.075 (±0.115), and 0.168 (±0.184) in the contacting phase and 0.159 (±0.112), -0.003 (±0.029), and 0.004 (±0.032) in the decontacting phase. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a better agreement between VFCA and the EGG waveform in the decontacting phase than in the contacting phase. Disagreements may be caused by nonuniform tissue conductance properties, electrode placement, and electroglottograph hardware circuitry. Pending further research, the EGG waveform may be a reasonable first approximation to change in medial contact area between the VFs during phonation. However, any quantitative and statistical data derived from EGG should be interpreted cautiously, allowing for potential deviations from true VFCA.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17001057
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170120104105.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170103s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.018 $2 doi
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jvoice.2015.03.018 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26256493
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Hampala, Vít $u Voice Research Lab, Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vit.hampala@gmail.com.
- 245 10
- $a Relationship Between the Electroglottographic Signal and Vocal Fold Contact Area / $c V. Hampala, M. Garcia, JG. Švec, RC. Scherer, CT. Herbst,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Electroglottography (EGG) is a widely used noninvasive method that purports to measure changes in relative vocal fold contact area (VFCA) during phonation. Despite its broad application, the putative direct relation between the EGG waveform and VFCA has to date only been formally tested in a single study, suggesting an approximately linear relationship. However, in that study, flow-induced vocal fold (VF) vibration was not investigated. A rigorous empirical evaluation of EGG as a measure of VFCA under proper physiological conditions is therefore still needed. METHODS/DESIGN: Three red deer larynges were phonated in an excised hemilarynx preparation using a conducting glass plate. The time-varying contact between the VF and the glass plate was assessed by high-speed video recordings at 6000 fps, synchronized to the EGG signal. RESULTS: The average differences between the normalized [0, 1] VFCA and EGG waveforms for the three larynges were 0.180 (±0.156), 0.075 (±0.115), and 0.168 (±0.184) in the contacting phase and 0.159 (±0.112), -0.003 (±0.029), and 0.004 (±0.032) in the decontacting phase. DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was a better agreement between VFCA and the EGG waveform in the decontacting phase than in the contacting phase. Disagreements may be caused by nonuniform tissue conductance properties, electrode placement, and electroglottograph hardware circuitry. Pending further research, the EGG waveform may be a reasonable first approximation to change in medial contact area between the VFs during phonation. However, any quantitative and statistical data derived from EGG should be interpreted cautiously, allowing for potential deviations from true VFCA.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a vysoká zvěř $7 D003670
- 650 _2
- $a elektrodiagnostika $x metody $7 D004568
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a laryngoskopie $7 D007828
- 650 12
- $a fonace $7 D010699
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
- 650 _2
- $a vibrace $7 D014732
- 650 _2
- $a audiovizuální záznam $7 D014741
- 650 _2
- $a hlasové řasy $x anatomie a histologie $x fyziologie $7 D014827
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural $7 D052061
- 700 1_
- $a Garcia, Maxime $u Laboratory of Bio-Acoustics, Department of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Švec, Jan G $u Voice Research Lab, Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Scherer, Ronald C $u Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, 200 Health and Human Services, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio.
- 700 1_
- $a Herbst, Christian T $u Voice Research Lab, Department of Biophysics, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180382 $t Journal of voice official journal of the Voice Foundation $x 1873-4588 $g Roč. 30, č. 2 (2016), s. 161-71
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26256493 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170103 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170120104214 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1180197 $s 961624
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 30 $c 2 $d 161-71 $e 20160118 $i 1873-4588 $m Journal of voice $n J Voice $x MED00180382
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170103