-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised, 52-week, open-label, safety study
AI. Vinik, S. Perrot, EJ. Vinik, L. Pazdera, H. Jacobs, M. Stoker, SK. Long, RJ. Snijder, M. van der Stoep, E. Ortega, N. Katz,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-12-18
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- aplikace kožní MeSH
- diabetické neuropatie komplikace farmakoterapie MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče * MeSH
- kapsaicin aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- látky ovlivňující senzorický systém aplikace a dávkování škodlivé účinky MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- neuralgie farmakoterapie etiologie MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- standardní péče * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: This 52-week study evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of capsaicin 8% w/w (179 mg) patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). METHODS: Phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomised, controlled, 52-week safety study, conducted in Europe. Patients were randomised to capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 or 60 min; 1-7 treatments with ≥ 8-week intervals) to painful areas of the feet plus SOC, or SOC alone. The primary objective was the safety of capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 min and 60 min applications) plus SOC versus SOC alone over 52 weeks, assessed by changes in Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) total score from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary safety endpoints included Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS) assessments and standardised testing of sensory perception and reflex function. RESULTS: Overall, 468 patients were randomised (30 min plus SOC, n = 156; 60 min plus SOC, n = 157; SOC alone, n = 155). By EoS, mean changes in Norfolk QOL-DN total score from baseline [estimated mean difference versus SOC alone; 90% CI for difference] were: 30 min plus SOC, -27.6% [-20.9; -31.7, -10.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -32.8% [-26.1; -36.8, -15.4]; SOC alone, -6.7%. Mean changes [difference versus SOC alone] in UENS total score by EoS versus baseline were: 30 min plus SOC, -2.1 [-0.9; -1.8, 0.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -3.0 [-1.7; -2.7, -0.8]; SOC alone, -1.2. No detrimental deterioration was observed in any of the Norfolk or UENS subscales by EoS with capsaicin. Also, no worsening in sensory perception testing of sharp, warm, cold and vibration stimuli was found with capsaicin by EoS. Capsaicin treatment was well tolerated and the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were application site pain (30 min, 28.2%; 60 min, 29.3%), burning sensation (30 min, 9.0%; 60 min, 9.6%) and application site erythema (30 min, 7.7%; 60 min, 8.9%). CONCLUSION: In patients with PDPN, capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus SOC over 52 weeks was well tolerated with no negative functional or neurological effects compared with SOC alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01478607 . Date of registration November 21, 2011; retrospectively registered.
Analgesic Solutions Natick MA USA Tufts University School of Medicine Boston MA USA
Astellas Pharma Europe B 5 Leiden The Netherlands
Astellas Pharma Europe B 5 Leiden The Netherlands INC Research Camberley UK
Hôpital Hôtel Dieu Paris Descartes University Paris France
Hospital Rio Hortega Valladolid Spain
Vestra Clinics Dedicated Research Clinics Rychnov nad Kneznou Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17013358
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170427114849.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12883-016-0752-7 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27919222
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Vinik, Aaron I $u Eastern Virginia Medical School, Strelitz Diabetes Center, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Room 2018, Norfolk, VA, 23510, USA. vinikai@evms.edu.
- 245 10
- $a Capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised, 52-week, open-label, safety study / $c AI. Vinik, S. Perrot, EJ. Vinik, L. Pazdera, H. Jacobs, M. Stoker, SK. Long, RJ. Snijder, M. van der Stoep, E. Ortega, N. Katz,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: This 52-week study evaluated the long-term safety and tolerability of capsaicin 8% w/w (179 mg) patch repeat treatment plus standard of care (SOC) versus SOC alone in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN). METHODS: Phase 3, multinational, open-label, randomised, controlled, 52-week safety study, conducted in Europe. Patients were randomised to capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 or 60 min; 1-7 treatments with ≥ 8-week intervals) to painful areas of the feet plus SOC, or SOC alone. The primary objective was the safety of capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment (30 min and 60 min applications) plus SOC versus SOC alone over 52 weeks, assessed by changes in Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (QOL-DN) total score from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary safety endpoints included Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS) assessments and standardised testing of sensory perception and reflex function. RESULTS: Overall, 468 patients were randomised (30 min plus SOC, n = 156; 60 min plus SOC, n = 157; SOC alone, n = 155). By EoS, mean changes in Norfolk QOL-DN total score from baseline [estimated mean difference versus SOC alone; 90% CI for difference] were: 30 min plus SOC, -27.6% [-20.9; -31.7, -10.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -32.8% [-26.1; -36.8, -15.4]; SOC alone, -6.7%. Mean changes [difference versus SOC alone] in UENS total score by EoS versus baseline were: 30 min plus SOC, -2.1 [-0.9; -1.8, 0.1]; 60 min plus SOC, -3.0 [-1.7; -2.7, -0.8]; SOC alone, -1.2. No detrimental deterioration was observed in any of the Norfolk or UENS subscales by EoS with capsaicin. Also, no worsening in sensory perception testing of sharp, warm, cold and vibration stimuli was found with capsaicin by EoS. Capsaicin treatment was well tolerated and the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were application site pain (30 min, 28.2%; 60 min, 29.3%), burning sensation (30 min, 9.0%; 60 min, 9.6%) and application site erythema (30 min, 7.7%; 60 min, 8.9%). CONCLUSION: In patients with PDPN, capsaicin 8% patch repeat treatment plus SOC over 52 weeks was well tolerated with no negative functional or neurological effects compared with SOC alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01478607 . Date of registration November 21, 2011; retrospectively registered.
- 650 _2
- $a aplikace kožní $7 D000279
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a kapsaicin $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D002211
- 650 _2
- $a diabetické neuropatie $x komplikace $x farmakoterapie $7 D003929
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neuralgie $x farmakoterapie $x etiologie $7 D009437
- 650 12
- $a hodnocení výsledků zdravotní péče $7 D017063
- 650 _2
- $a látky ovlivňující senzorický systém $x aplikace a dávkování $x škodlivé účinky $7 D018689
- 650 12
- $a standardní péče $7 D059039
- 655 _2
- $a klinické zkoušky, fáze III $7 D017428
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Perrot, Serge $u Hôpital Hôtel Dieu, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Vinik, Etta J $u Eastern Virginia Medical School, Strelitz Diabetes Center, 855 W Brambleton Avenue, Room 2018, Norfolk, VA, 23510, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Pazdera, Ladislav $u Vestra Clinics - Dedicated Research Clinics, Rychnov nad Kneznou, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jacobs, Hélène $u Astellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Stoker, Malcolm $u Astellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Long, Stephen K $u Astellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands. INC Research, Camberley, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Snijder, Robert J $u Astellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a van der Stoep, Marjolijne $u Astellas Pharma Europe B. V, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Ortega, Enrique $u Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Katz, Nathaniel $u Analgesic Solutions, Natick, MA, USA. Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008195 $t BMC neurology $x 1471-2377 $g Roč. 16, č. 1 (2016), s. 251
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27919222 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170427115209 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1199823 $s 974136
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 16 $c 1 $d 251 $e 20161206 $i 1471-2377 $m BMC neurology $n BMC Neurol $x MED00008195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413