-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression
H. Machackova, J. Pfetsch,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
26946454
DOI
10.1111/sjop.12277
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- afekt MeSH
- agrese psychologie MeSH
- chování dětí psychologie MeSH
- chování mladistvých psychologie MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- empatie * MeSH
- internet MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- oběti zločinu psychologie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- šikana * MeSH
- sociální chování MeSH
- sociální normy * MeSH
- studenti psychologie MeSH
- vyrovnaná skupina * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Německo MeSH
Cyberbullying often takes place with the virtual presence or knowledge of bystanders. While we have some evidence about the determinants of bystanders' responses to offline bullying, we lack empirical studies concerning the variables that influence bystanders' responses to cyberbullying. The current study examines bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Two types of responses were captured: support toward the victims and the reinforcement of bullies' actions. Using data from 321 German adolescents (ages 12-18; M = 14.99; 44% girls), the association between bystanders' responses and normative beliefs about verbal aggression and cyberaggression, and affective and cognitive empathy, were tested in a path model. Both types of normative beliefs positively predicted the reinforcement of bullies, and normative belief about verbal aggression also predicted support for the victims of offline bullying. Both types of empathy predicted support in offline bullying, but only affective empathy predicted support in cyberbullying. There was no link between affective or cognitive empathy to the reinforcement of bullies. Moreover, bystanders' tendencies to respond supportively to the victim or to reinforce the bully were rather consistent in both cyber- and offline bullying, but there was no link between support and reinforcement. The findings are discussed with regard to implications for prevention and intervention efforts.
Faculty of Social Studies Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Education Department of Educational Psychology Technische Universität Berlin Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17014056
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170425124117.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170413s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/sjop.12277 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26946454
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Machackova, Hana $u Faculty of Social Studies, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying: The role of empathy and normative beliefs about aggression / $c H. Machackova, J. Pfetsch,
- 520 9_
- $a Cyberbullying often takes place with the virtual presence or knowledge of bystanders. While we have some evidence about the determinants of bystanders' responses to offline bullying, we lack empirical studies concerning the variables that influence bystanders' responses to cyberbullying. The current study examines bystanders' responses to offline bullying and cyberbullying incidents. Two types of responses were captured: support toward the victims and the reinforcement of bullies' actions. Using data from 321 German adolescents (ages 12-18; M = 14.99; 44% girls), the association between bystanders' responses and normative beliefs about verbal aggression and cyberaggression, and affective and cognitive empathy, were tested in a path model. Both types of normative beliefs positively predicted the reinforcement of bullies, and normative belief about verbal aggression also predicted support for the victims of offline bullying. Both types of empathy predicted support in offline bullying, but only affective empathy predicted support in cyberbullying. There was no link between affective or cognitive empathy to the reinforcement of bullies. Moreover, bystanders' tendencies to respond supportively to the victim or to reinforce the bully were rather consistent in both cyber- and offline bullying, but there was no link between support and reinforcement. The findings are discussed with regard to implications for prevention and intervention efforts.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a chování mladistvých $x psychologie $7 D000294
- 650 _2
- $a afekt $7 D000339
- 650 _2
- $a agrese $x psychologie $7 D000374
- 650 12
- $a šikana $7 D058445
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a chování dětí $x psychologie $7 D002652
- 650 _2
- $a oběti zločinu $x psychologie $7 D019548
- 650 12
- $a empatie $7 D004645
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a Německo $7 D005858
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a internet $7 D020407
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a vyrovnaná skupina $7 D010379
- 650 _2
- $a sociální chování $7 D012919
- 650 12
- $a sociální normy $7 D066262
- 650 _2
- $a studenti $x psychologie $7 D013334
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Pfetsch, Jan $u Institute of Education, Department of Educational Psychology, Technische Universität Berlin, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00004271 $t Scandinavian journal of psychology $x 1467-9450 $g Roč. 57, č. 2 (2016), s. 169-76
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26946454 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170413 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170425124435 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1200521 $s 974834
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 57 $c 2 $d 169-76 $i 1467-9450 $m Scandinavian journal of psychology $n Scand J Psychol $x MED00004271
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170413