-
Something wrong with this record ?
Bolus application of landiolol and esmolol: comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in a healthy Caucasian group
G. Krumpl, I. Ulc, M. Trebs, P. Kadlecová, J. Hodisch,
Language English Country Germany
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- White People * MeSH
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists administration & dosage pharmacokinetics pharmacology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Urea administration & dosage analogs & derivatives pharmacokinetics pharmacology MeSH
- Morpholines administration & dosage pharmacokinetics pharmacology MeSH
- Propanolamines administration & dosage pharmacokinetics pharmacology MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare in non-Asian subjects the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of two short-acting cardioselective β1-adrenergic antagonists, landiolol and esmolol, after administration of three different bolus dosages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in three cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men, mean age of 24.5 ± 6.9 years) each receiving three doses of landiolol (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg BW) either in a newly developed concentrate i.v. formulation (Rapibloc® 20 mg/2 mL concentrate) or a lyophilized formulation, or three doses of esmolol (0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg/kg BW) in an i.v. formulation (Brevibloc® 100 mg/10 mL). PK and PD parameters, safety, and tolerability were assessed. FINDINGS: Results of the two landiolol formulations were reported previously and were similar. For the landiolol concentrate formulation and esmolol, maximum blood concentrations were rapidly reached (mean t max ranged between 1.8 and 3.0 min for landiolol and 1.8 to 2.4 min for esmolol). The parent drugs disappeared very fast from the blood stream, with a t 1/2 of 3.2 ± 1.2 (SD) minutes and 3.7 ± 2.1 (SD) minutes for the low doses of landiolol and esmolol, respectively. Despite comparable injection rates (0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg/15 s for landiolol and esmolol, respectively), the onset of significant heart rate reduction occurred earlier in response to landiolol (1 min) than in response to esmolol (2 min). In addition, significantly lower heart rate values were obtained at every dose level of landiolol, in comparison to esmolol (p < 0.05). Both compounds reduced the systolic blood pressure to a comparable degree. Especially at the highest dose, the duration of blood pressure reduction was longer under esmolol compared to landiolol. Seven mild to moderate adverse events occurred after administration of landiolol, and five occurred after administration of esmolol. No serious adverse events were reported in this study. IMPLICATIONS: Heart rate reduction induced by a new liquid formulation of landiolol occurred faster, was more pronounced, and lasted longer than the effects of corresponding standard esmolol doses. Both agents reduced systolic blood pressure to a comparable degree, but the blood pressure decrease lasted longer after esmolol infusion. The local tolerance and safety profiles of the two formulations were similar. In summary, compared to esmolol, landiolol shows a more prominent and pronounced bradycardic effect in relation to its blood pressure-lowering effect, an action profile that might be of specific advantage in the perioperative setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01652898 and 2012-002127-14. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01652898?term=landiolol&rank=7.
AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG Wien Austria
Aprova s r o Prague Czech Republic
Center for Pharmacology and Analysis s r o Prague Czech Republic
MRN Medical Research Network GmbH Postgasse 11 22 A 1010 Vienna Austria
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023361
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170906131640.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s00228-016-2176-0 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28091703
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a gw
- 100 1_
- $a Krumpl, Günther $u MRN Medical Research Network GmbH, Postgasse 11/22, A-1010, Vienna, Austria. g.krumpl@medresnet.com.
- 245 10
- $a Bolus application of landiolol and esmolol: comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles in a healthy Caucasian group / $c G. Krumpl, I. Ulc, M. Trebs, P. Kadlecová, J. Hodisch,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare in non-Asian subjects the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of two short-acting cardioselective β1-adrenergic antagonists, landiolol and esmolol, after administration of three different bolus dosages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, double-blinded, randomized study in three cross-over periods with 12 healthy subjects (7 women and 5 men, mean age of 24.5 ± 6.9 years) each receiving three doses of landiolol (0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg/kg BW) either in a newly developed concentrate i.v. formulation (Rapibloc® 20 mg/2 mL concentrate) or a lyophilized formulation, or three doses of esmolol (0.5, 1, and 1.5 mg/kg BW) in an i.v. formulation (Brevibloc® 100 mg/10 mL). PK and PD parameters, safety, and tolerability were assessed. FINDINGS: Results of the two landiolol formulations were reported previously and were similar. For the landiolol concentrate formulation and esmolol, maximum blood concentrations were rapidly reached (mean t max ranged between 1.8 and 3.0 min for landiolol and 1.8 to 2.4 min for esmolol). The parent drugs disappeared very fast from the blood stream, with a t 1/2 of 3.2 ± 1.2 (SD) minutes and 3.7 ± 2.1 (SD) minutes for the low doses of landiolol and esmolol, respectively. Despite comparable injection rates (0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg/15 s for landiolol and esmolol, respectively), the onset of significant heart rate reduction occurred earlier in response to landiolol (1 min) than in response to esmolol (2 min). In addition, significantly lower heart rate values were obtained at every dose level of landiolol, in comparison to esmolol (p < 0.05). Both compounds reduced the systolic blood pressure to a comparable degree. Especially at the highest dose, the duration of blood pressure reduction was longer under esmolol compared to landiolol. Seven mild to moderate adverse events occurred after administration of landiolol, and five occurred after administration of esmolol. No serious adverse events were reported in this study. IMPLICATIONS: Heart rate reduction induced by a new liquid formulation of landiolol occurred faster, was more pronounced, and lasted longer than the effects of corresponding standard esmolol doses. Both agents reduced systolic blood pressure to a comparable degree, but the blood pressure decrease lasted longer after esmolol infusion. The local tolerance and safety profiles of the two formulations were similar. In summary, compared to esmolol, landiolol shows a more prominent and pronounced bradycardic effect in relation to its blood pressure-lowering effect, an action profile that might be of specific advantage in the perioperative setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01652898 and 2012-002127-14. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01652898?term=landiolol&rank=7.
- 650 _2
- $a beta blokátory $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakokinetika $x farmakologie $7 D000319
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 12
- $a běloši $7 D044465
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a morfoliny $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakokinetika $x farmakologie $7 D009025
- 650 _2
- $a propanolaminy $x aplikace a dávkování $x farmakokinetika $x farmakologie $7 D011412
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a močovina $x aplikace a dávkování $x analogy a deriváty $x farmakokinetika $x farmakologie $7 D014508
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Ulc, Ivan $u Center for Pharmacology and Analysis s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Trebs, Michaela $u AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG, Wien, Austria.
- 700 1_
- $a Kadlecová, Pavla $u Aprova s.r.o, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hodisch, Juri $u AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals AG, Wien, Austria.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001613 $t European journal of clinical pharmacology $x 1432-1041 $g Roč. 73, č. 4 (2017), s. 417-428
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28091703 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170906132239 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1239042 $s 984274
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 73 $c 4 $d 417-428 $e 20170113 $i 1432-1041 $m European journal of clinical pharmacology $n Eur J Clin Pharmacol $x MED00001613
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720