OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare various methods for free light chain (fLC) quantitation in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum and to determine whether quantitative CSF measurements could reliably predict intrathecal fLC synthesis. In addition, we wished to determine the relationship between free kappa and free lambda light chain concentrations in CSF and serum in various disease groups. METHODS: We analysed 166 paired CSF and serum samples by at least one of the following methods: turbidimetry (Freelite™, SPAPLUS), nephelometry (N Latex FLC™, BN ProSpec), and two different (commercially available and in-house developed) sandwich ELISAs. The results were compared with oligoclonal fLC detected by affinity-mediated immunoblotting after isoelectric focusing. RESULTS: Although the correlations between quantitative methods were good, both proportional and systematic differences were discerned. However, no major differences were observed in the prediction of positive oligoclonal fLC test. Surprisingly, CSF free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were lower than those in serum in about 75% of samples with negative oligoclonal fLC test. In about a half of patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, profoundly increased free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios were found in the CSF. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that using appropriate method-specific cut-offs, different methods of CSF fLC quantitation can be used for the prediction of intrathecal fLC synthesis. The reason for unexpectedly low free kappa/free lambda light chain ratios in normal CSFs remains to be elucidated. Whereas CSF free kappa light chain concentration is increased in most patients with multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, CSF free lambda light chain values show large interindividual variability in these patients and should be investigated further for possible immunopathological and prognostic significance.

Clinic of Neurology University Hospital Ostrava 17 listopadu 1790 708 52 Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic

Institute for Healthcare Disciplines St Elisabeth University of Health and Social Work in Bratislava Palackého 1 P O Box 104 810 00 Bratislava Slovak Republic

Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics University Hospital Ostrava 17 listopadu 1790 708 52 Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic

Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics University Hospital Ostrava 17 listopadu 1790 708 52 Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic Clinic of Neurology University Hospital Ostrava 17 listopadu 1790 708 52 Ostrava Poruba Czech Republic

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org