-
Something wrong with this record ?
Electrophysiological testing of visual function after mirror telescope implantation: a case report
J. Kremláček, N. Jirásková, J. Nekolová, R. Šikl, M. Kuba,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Case Reports, Journal Article
NLK
ProQuest Central
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
- MeSH
- Lenses * MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Macular Degeneration * physiopathology rehabilitation MeSH
- Pattern Recognition, Visual physiology MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Telescopes * MeSH
- Visual Acuity MeSH
- Visual Perception physiology MeSH
- Evoked Potentials, Visual * MeSH
- Visual Prosthesis * standards MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Case Reports MeSH
PURPOSE: The implantation of an intraocular telescope increases life quality in patients with end-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The present study monitored changes in electrophysiological markers of visual processing before and during seventeen months after a novel mirror telescope implantation in two patients (OV-male 90 years, MZ-female 70 years) with the final-stage form of AMD. METHODS: Visual evoked potentials were recorded to high-contrast pattern-reversal (PR-VEP for check size 40' and 10'), low-contrast motion-onset stimuli (in visual periphery M-VEP M20°, and in central part M-VEP C8°), and event-related potentials (ERPs) in the oddball visual paradigm. RESULTS: MZ's more systematic responses showed attenuation and prolongation of the M-VEP M20° and the PR-VEP 40' immediately after the telescope implantation with a slow amplitude recovery with unchanged prolonged latency. The implantation completely eradicated the M-VEP C8° without any restoration. The PR-VEP 10' were not readable. Only a part of OV's PR-VEP 40' and M-VEP M20' were of a repeatable and expected morphology. These OV's VEPs were consistent with MZ's findings. The ERPs did not show any effect of implantation in both patients. Post-implantation visual acuity and reaction time overcame the pre-implantation levels. CONCLUSIONS: The mirror telescope preserved peripheral vision in contrast to classic telescopes; however, the telescope concurrently reduced the luminance of the magnified retinal image, which was likely responsible for the prolongation of the VEP latencies.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc17023511
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20170831111102.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 170720s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s10633-016-9563-9 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27832406
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Kremláček, Jan $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Šimkova 870, 500 38, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. jan.kremlacek@lfhk.cuni.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Electrophysiological testing of visual function after mirror telescope implantation: a case report / $c J. Kremláček, N. Jirásková, J. Nekolová, R. Šikl, M. Kuba,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: The implantation of an intraocular telescope increases life quality in patients with end-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The present study monitored changes in electrophysiological markers of visual processing before and during seventeen months after a novel mirror telescope implantation in two patients (OV-male 90 years, MZ-female 70 years) with the final-stage form of AMD. METHODS: Visual evoked potentials were recorded to high-contrast pattern-reversal (PR-VEP for check size 40' and 10'), low-contrast motion-onset stimuli (in visual periphery M-VEP M20°, and in central part M-VEP C8°), and event-related potentials (ERPs) in the oddball visual paradigm. RESULTS: MZ's more systematic responses showed attenuation and prolongation of the M-VEP M20° and the PR-VEP 40' immediately after the telescope implantation with a slow amplitude recovery with unchanged prolonged latency. The implantation completely eradicated the M-VEP C8° without any restoration. The PR-VEP 10' were not readable. Only a part of OV's PR-VEP 40' and M-VEP M20' were of a repeatable and expected morphology. These OV's VEPs were consistent with MZ's findings. The ERPs did not show any effect of implantation in both patients. Post-implantation visual acuity and reaction time overcame the pre-implantation levels. CONCLUSIONS: The mirror telescope preserved peripheral vision in contrast to classic telescopes; however, the telescope concurrently reduced the luminance of the magnified retinal image, which was likely responsible for the prolongation of the VEP latencies.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a zrakové evokované potenciály $7 D005074
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a čočky $7 D007909
- 650 12
- $a makulární degenerace $x patofyziologie $x rehabilitace $7 D008268
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a rozpoznávání obrazu $x fyziologie $7 D010364
- 650 12
- $a teleskopy $7 D061351
- 650 _2
- $a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
- 650 _2
- $a zraková percepce $x fyziologie $7 D014796
- 650 12
- $a zrakové protézy $x normy $7 D057488
- 655 _2
- $a kazuistiky $7 D002363
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Jirásková, Naďa $u Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, University Hospital and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Nekolová, Jana $u Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, University Hospital and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šikl, Radovan $u Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kuba, Miroslav $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Šimkova 870, 500 38, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00010453 $t Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology $x 1573-2622 $g Roč. 133, č. 3 (2016), s. 171-181
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27832406 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20170720 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20170831111652 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1239192 $s 984424
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 133 $c 3 $d 171-181 $e 20161110 $i 1573-2622 $m Documenta ophthalmologica $n Doc Ophthalmol $x MED00010453
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20170720