Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Electrophysiological testing of visual function after mirror telescope implantation: a case report

J. Kremláček, N. Jirásková, J. Nekolová, R. Šikl, M. Kuba,

. 2016 ; 133 (3) : 171-181. [pub] 20161110

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Case Reports, Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-03-01 to 1 year ago

PURPOSE: The implantation of an intraocular telescope increases life quality in patients with end-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The present study monitored changes in electrophysiological markers of visual processing before and during seventeen months after a novel mirror telescope implantation in two patients (OV-male 90 years, MZ-female 70 years) with the final-stage form of AMD. METHODS: Visual evoked potentials were recorded to high-contrast pattern-reversal (PR-VEP for check size 40' and 10'), low-contrast motion-onset stimuli (in visual periphery M-VEP M20°, and in central part M-VEP C8°), and event-related potentials (ERPs) in the oddball visual paradigm. RESULTS: MZ's more systematic responses showed attenuation and prolongation of the M-VEP M20° and the PR-VEP 40' immediately after the telescope implantation with a slow amplitude recovery with unchanged prolonged latency. The implantation completely eradicated the M-VEP C8° without any restoration. The PR-VEP 10' were not readable. Only a part of OV's PR-VEP 40' and M-VEP M20' were of a repeatable and expected morphology. These OV's VEPs were consistent with MZ's findings. The ERPs did not show any effect of implantation in both patients. Post-implantation visual acuity and reaction time overcame the pre-implantation levels. CONCLUSIONS: The mirror telescope preserved peripheral vision in contrast to classic telescopes; however, the telescope concurrently reduced the luminance of the magnified retinal image, which was likely responsible for the prolongation of the VEP latencies.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023511
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170831111102.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s10633-016-9563-9 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27832406
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Kremláček, Jan $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Šimkova 870, 500 38, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. jan.kremlacek@lfhk.cuni.cz.
245    10
$a Electrophysiological testing of visual function after mirror telescope implantation: a case report / $c J. Kremláček, N. Jirásková, J. Nekolová, R. Šikl, M. Kuba,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The implantation of an intraocular telescope increases life quality in patients with end-stage age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The present study monitored changes in electrophysiological markers of visual processing before and during seventeen months after a novel mirror telescope implantation in two patients (OV-male 90 years, MZ-female 70 years) with the final-stage form of AMD. METHODS: Visual evoked potentials were recorded to high-contrast pattern-reversal (PR-VEP for check size 40' and 10'), low-contrast motion-onset stimuli (in visual periphery M-VEP M20°, and in central part M-VEP C8°), and event-related potentials (ERPs) in the oddball visual paradigm. RESULTS: MZ's more systematic responses showed attenuation and prolongation of the M-VEP M20° and the PR-VEP 40' immediately after the telescope implantation with a slow amplitude recovery with unchanged prolonged latency. The implantation completely eradicated the M-VEP C8° without any restoration. The PR-VEP 10' were not readable. Only a part of OV's PR-VEP 40' and M-VEP M20' were of a repeatable and expected morphology. These OV's VEPs were consistent with MZ's findings. The ERPs did not show any effect of implantation in both patients. Post-implantation visual acuity and reaction time overcame the pre-implantation levels. CONCLUSIONS: The mirror telescope preserved peripheral vision in contrast to classic telescopes; however, the telescope concurrently reduced the luminance of the magnified retinal image, which was likely responsible for the prolongation of the VEP latencies.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a zrakové evokované potenciály $7 D005074
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    12
$a čočky $7 D007909
650    12
$a makulární degenerace $x patofyziologie $x rehabilitace $7 D008268
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a rozpoznávání obrazu $x fyziologie $7 D010364
650    12
$a teleskopy $7 D061351
650    _2
$a zraková ostrost $7 D014792
650    _2
$a zraková percepce $x fyziologie $7 D014796
650    12
$a zrakové protézy $x normy $7 D057488
655    _2
$a kazuistiky $7 D002363
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jirásková, Naďa $u Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, University Hospital and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nekolová, Jana $u Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, University Hospital and Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šikl, Radovan $u Institute of Psychology, Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kuba, Miroslav $u Department of Pathological Physiology, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Šimkova 870, 500 38, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00010453 $t Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology $x 1573-2622 $g Roč. 133, č. 3 (2016), s. 171-181
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27832406 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170831111652 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239192 $s 984424
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 133 $c 3 $d 171-181 $e 20161110 $i 1573-2622 $m Documenta ophthalmologica $n Doc Ophthalmol $x MED00010453
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...