Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Experimental Evaluation of Suitability of Selected Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Large-Scale Agent-Based Simulations

P. Tučník, V. Bureš,

. 2016 ; 11 (11) : e0165171. [pub] 20161102

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) can be formally implemented by various methods. This study compares suitability of four selected MCDM methods, namely WPM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE, for future applications in agent-based computational economic (ACE) models of larger scale (i.e., over 10 000 agents in one geographical region). These four MCDM methods were selected according to their appropriateness for computational processing in ACE applications. Tests of the selected methods were conducted on four hardware configurations. For each method, 100 tests were performed, which represented one testing iteration. With four testing iterations conducted on each hardware setting and separated testing of all configurations with the-server parameter de/activated, altogether, 12800 data points were collected and consequently analyzed. An illustrational decision-making scenario was used which allows the mutual comparison of all of the selected decision making methods. Our test results suggest that although all methods are convenient and can be used in practice, the VIKOR method accomplished the tests with the best results and thus can be recommended as the most suitable for simulations of large-scale agent-based models.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17023544
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20170720122253.0
007      
ta
008      
170720s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0165171 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27806061
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Tučník, Petr $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Experimental Evaluation of Suitability of Selected Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods for Large-Scale Agent-Based Simulations / $c P. Tučník, V. Bureš,
520    9_
$a Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) can be formally implemented by various methods. This study compares suitability of four selected MCDM methods, namely WPM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, and PROMETHEE, for future applications in agent-based computational economic (ACE) models of larger scale (i.e., over 10 000 agents in one geographical region). These four MCDM methods were selected according to their appropriateness for computational processing in ACE applications. Tests of the selected methods were conducted on four hardware configurations. For each method, 100 tests were performed, which represented one testing iteration. With four testing iterations conducted on each hardware setting and separated testing of all configurations with the-server parameter de/activated, altogether, 12800 data points were collected and consequently analyzed. An illustrational decision-making scenario was used which allows the mutual comparison of all of the selected decision making methods. Our test results suggest that although all methods are convenient and can be used in practice, the VIKOR method accomplished the tests with the best results and thus can be recommended as the most suitable for simulations of large-scale agent-based models.
650    12
$a rozhodování $7 D003657
650    _2
$a metody pro podporu rozhodování $7 D003661
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a ekonomické modely $7 D018803
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Bureš, Vladimír $u Faculty of Informatics and Management, University of Hradec Králové, Rokitanského 62, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 11, č. 11 (2016), s. e0165171
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27806061 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20170720 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20170720122746 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1239225 $s 984457
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 11 $c 11 $d e0165171 $e 20161102 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20170720

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...