Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

The complexity underlying invasiveness precludes the identification of invasive traits: A comparative study of invasive and non-invasive heterocarpic Atriplex congeners

J. Doudová, J. Douda, B. Mandák,

. 2017 ; 12 (4) : e0176455. [pub] 20170426

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

Heterocarpy enables species to effectively spread under unfavourable conditions by producing two or more types of fruit differing in ecological characteristics. Although it is frequent in annuals occupying disturbed habitats that are vulnerable to invasion, there is still a lack of congeneric studies addressing the importance of heterocarpy for species invasion success. We compared two pairs of heterocarpic Atriplex species, each of them comprising one invasive and one non-invasive non-native congener. In two common garden experiments, we (i) simulated the influence of different levels of nutrients and population density on plants grown from different types of fruits and examined several traits that are generally positively associated with invasion success, and (ii) grew plants in a replacement series experiment to evaluate resource partitioning between them and to compare their competitive ability. We found that specific functional traits or competitiveness of species cannot explain the invasiveness of Atriplex species, indicating that species invasiveness involves more complex interactions of traits that are important only in certain ecological contexts, i.e. in specific environmental conditions and only some habitats. Interestingly, species trait differences related to invasion success were found between plants growing from the ecologically most contrasting fruit types. We suggest that fruit types differing in ecological behaviour may be essential in the process of invasion or in the general spreading of heterocarpic species, as they either the maximize population growth (type C fruit) or enhance the chance of survival of new populations (type A fruit). Congeners offer the best available methodical framework for comparing traits among phylogenetically closely related invasive and non-invasive species. However, as indicated by our results, this approach is unlikely to reveal invasive traits because of the complexity underlying invasiveness.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17030858
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171025122754.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0176455 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28445514
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Doudová, Jana $u Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    14
$a The complexity underlying invasiveness precludes the identification of invasive traits: A comparative study of invasive and non-invasive heterocarpic Atriplex congeners / $c J. Doudová, J. Douda, B. Mandák,
520    9_
$a Heterocarpy enables species to effectively spread under unfavourable conditions by producing two or more types of fruit differing in ecological characteristics. Although it is frequent in annuals occupying disturbed habitats that are vulnerable to invasion, there is still a lack of congeneric studies addressing the importance of heterocarpy for species invasion success. We compared two pairs of heterocarpic Atriplex species, each of them comprising one invasive and one non-invasive non-native congener. In two common garden experiments, we (i) simulated the influence of different levels of nutrients and population density on plants grown from different types of fruits and examined several traits that are generally positively associated with invasion success, and (ii) grew plants in a replacement series experiment to evaluate resource partitioning between them and to compare their competitive ability. We found that specific functional traits or competitiveness of species cannot explain the invasiveness of Atriplex species, indicating that species invasiveness involves more complex interactions of traits that are important only in certain ecological contexts, i.e. in specific environmental conditions and only some habitats. Interestingly, species trait differences related to invasion success were found between plants growing from the ecologically most contrasting fruit types. We suggest that fruit types differing in ecological behaviour may be essential in the process of invasion or in the general spreading of heterocarpic species, as they either the maximize population growth (type C fruit) or enhance the chance of survival of new populations (type A fruit). Congeners offer the best available methodical framework for comparing traits among phylogenetically closely related invasive and non-invasive species. However, as indicated by our results, this approach is unlikely to reveal invasive traits because of the complexity underlying invasiveness.
650    _2
$a Atriplex $x růst a vývoj $7 D027466
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a ovoce $x růst a vývoj $x fyziologie $7 D005638
650    _2
$a klíčení $7 D018525
650    12
$a zavlečené druhy $7 D058865
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Douda, Jan $u Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mandák, Bohumil $u Department of Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic. Department of Genetic Ecology, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 4 (2017), s. e0176455
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28445514 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171025122836 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1254451 $s 991885
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 12 $c 4 $d e0176455 $e 20170426 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...