Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores

M. Petrik, C. Zhai, Z. Novy, L. Urbanek, H. Haas, C. Decristoforo,

. 2016 ; 18 (3) : 344-52.

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 2005-01-01 to 2019-01-31
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2011-02-01 to 1 year ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2005-01-01 to 2019-01-31
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2005-01-01 to 2019-01-31

PURPOSE: Some [(68)Ga]siderophores show promise in specific and sensitive imaging of infection. Here, we compare the in vitro and in vivo behaviour of selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 labelled siderophores. PROCEDURES: Radiolabelling was performed in HEPES or sodium acetate buffer systems. Radiochemical purity of labelled siderophores was determined using chromatography. Partition coefficients, in vitro stability and protein binding affinities were determined. Ex vivo biodistribution and animal imaging was studied in mice. RESULTS: Certain differences among studied siderophores were observed in labelling efficiency. Protein binding and stability tests showed highest stabilities and lowest protein binding affinities for Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC). All studied Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]siderophores exhibited a similar biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in mice with the exception of [(89)Zr]ferrioxamine E (FOXE). CONCLUSIONS: Zr-89 and [(68)Ga]siderophores showed analogous in vitro and in vivo behaviour. Tested [(89)Zr]siderophores could be applied for longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) studies of fungal infections and especially TAFC for the development of novel bioconjugates.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc17031895
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20171031110630.0
007      
ta
008      
171025s2016 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s11307-015-0897-6 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26424719
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Petrik, Milos $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Hnevotinska 5, CZ-77900, Olomouc, Czech Republic. milospetrik@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 Labelled Siderophores / $c M. Petrik, C. Zhai, Z. Novy, L. Urbanek, H. Haas, C. Decristoforo,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: Some [(68)Ga]siderophores show promise in specific and sensitive imaging of infection. Here, we compare the in vitro and in vivo behaviour of selected Ga-68 and Zr-89 labelled siderophores. PROCEDURES: Radiolabelling was performed in HEPES or sodium acetate buffer systems. Radiochemical purity of labelled siderophores was determined using chromatography. Partition coefficients, in vitro stability and protein binding affinities were determined. Ex vivo biodistribution and animal imaging was studied in mice. RESULTS: Certain differences among studied siderophores were observed in labelling efficiency. Protein binding and stability tests showed highest stabilities and lowest protein binding affinities for Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]triacetylfusarinine C (TAFC). All studied Ga-68 and [(89)Zr]siderophores exhibited a similar biodistribution and pharmacokinetics in mice with the exception of [(89)Zr]ferrioxamine E (FOXE). CONCLUSIONS: Zr-89 and [(68)Ga]siderophores showed analogous in vitro and in vivo behaviour. Tested [(89)Zr]siderophores could be applied for longitudinal positron emission tomography (PET) studies of fungal infections and especially TAFC for the development of novel bioconjugates.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a radioizotopy galia $x chemie $7 D005710
650    _2
$a myši inbrední BALB C $7 D008807
650    _2
$a pozitronová emisní tomografie $7 D049268
650    _2
$a radionuklidy $7 D011868
650    _2
$a siderofory $x chemie $7 D017262
650    _2
$a tkáňová distribuce $7 D014018
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a zirkonium $x chemie $7 D015040
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Zhai, Chuangyan $u Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Novy, Zbynek $u Institute of Molecular and Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, Hnevotinska 5, CZ-77900, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Urbanek, Lubor $u Laboratory of Growth Regulators, Centre of the Region Hana for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Institute of Experimental Botany AS CR & Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Haas, Hubertus $u Division of Molecular Biology/Biocenter, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
700    1_
$a Decristoforo, Clemens $u Clinical Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
773    0_
$w MED00008643 $t Molecular imaging and biology MIB the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging $x 1860-2002 $g Roč. 18, č. 3 (2016), s. 344-52
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26424719 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20171025 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20171031110720 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1255488 $s 992922
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 18 $c 3 $d 344-52 $i 1860-2002 $m Molecular imaging and biology $n Mol Imaging Biol $x MED00008643
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20171025

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...