• Something wrong with this record ?

Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphological approach in the identification of host-parasitoid interactions

M. Šigut, M. Kostovčík, H. Šigutová, J. Hulcr, P. Drozd, J. Hrček,

. 2017 ; 12 (12) : e0187803. [pub] 20171213

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Understanding interactions between herbivores and parasitoids is essential for successful biodiversity protection and monitoring and for biological pest control. Morphological identifications employ insect rearing and are complicated by insects' high diversity and crypsis. DNA barcoding has been successfully used in studies of host-parasitoid interactions as it can substantially increase the recovered real host-parasitoid diversity distorted by overlooked species complexes, or by species with slight morphological differences. However, this approach does not allow the simultaneous detection and identification of host(s) and parasitoid(s). Recently, high-throughput sequencing has shown high potential for surveying ecological communities and trophic interactions. Using mock samples comprising insect larvae and their parasitoids, we tested the potential of DNA metabarcoding for identifying individuals involved in host-parasitoid interactions to different taxonomic levels, and compared it to standard DNA barcoding and morphological approaches. For DNA metabarcoding, we targeted the standard barcoding marker cytochrome oxidase subunit I using highly degenerate primers, 2*300 bp sequencing on a MiSeq platform, and RTAX classification using paired-end reads. Additionally, using a large host-parasitoid dataset from a Central European floodplain forest, we assess the completeness and usability of a local reference library by confronting the number of Barcoding Index Numbers obtained by standard barcoding with the number of morphotypes. Overall, metabarcoding recovery was high, identifying 92.8% of the taxa present in mock samples, and identification success within individual taxonomic levels did not significantly differ among metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphology. Based on the current local reference library, 39.4% parasitoid and 90.7% host taxa were identified to the species level. DNA barcoding estimated higher parasitoid diversity than morphotyping, especially in groups with high level of crypsis. This study suggests the potential of metabarcoding for effectively recovering host-parasitoid diversity, together with more accurate identifications obtained from building reliable and comprehensive reference libraries, especially for parasitoids.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18010241
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404141916.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0187803 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29236697
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šigut, Martin $u Department of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphological approach in the identification of host-parasitoid interactions / $c M. Šigut, M. Kostovčík, H. Šigutová, J. Hulcr, P. Drozd, J. Hrček,
520    9_
$a Understanding interactions between herbivores and parasitoids is essential for successful biodiversity protection and monitoring and for biological pest control. Morphological identifications employ insect rearing and are complicated by insects' high diversity and crypsis. DNA barcoding has been successfully used in studies of host-parasitoid interactions as it can substantially increase the recovered real host-parasitoid diversity distorted by overlooked species complexes, or by species with slight morphological differences. However, this approach does not allow the simultaneous detection and identification of host(s) and parasitoid(s). Recently, high-throughput sequencing has shown high potential for surveying ecological communities and trophic interactions. Using mock samples comprising insect larvae and their parasitoids, we tested the potential of DNA metabarcoding for identifying individuals involved in host-parasitoid interactions to different taxonomic levels, and compared it to standard DNA barcoding and morphological approaches. For DNA metabarcoding, we targeted the standard barcoding marker cytochrome oxidase subunit I using highly degenerate primers, 2*300 bp sequencing on a MiSeq platform, and RTAX classification using paired-end reads. Additionally, using a large host-parasitoid dataset from a Central European floodplain forest, we assess the completeness and usability of a local reference library by confronting the number of Barcoding Index Numbers obtained by standard barcoding with the number of morphotypes. Overall, metabarcoding recovery was high, identifying 92.8% of the taxa present in mock samples, and identification success within individual taxonomic levels did not significantly differ among metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphology. Based on the current local reference library, 39.4% parasitoid and 90.7% host taxa were identified to the species level. DNA barcoding estimated higher parasitoid diversity than morphotyping, especially in groups with high level of crypsis. This study suggests the potential of metabarcoding for effectively recovering host-parasitoid diversity, together with more accurate identifications obtained from building reliable and comprehensive reference libraries, especially for parasitoids.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a taxonomické DNA čárové kódování $7 D058893
650    _2
$a býložravci $7 D060434
650    12
$a interakce hostitele a parazita $7 D006790
650    _2
$a Hymenoptera $x růst a vývoj $7 D006927
650    12
$a larva $7 D007814
650    _2
$a Lepidoptera $x růst a vývoj $7 D007915
650    _2
$a rostliny $x parazitologie $7 D010944
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kostovčík, Martin $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic. BIOCEV, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šigutová, Hana $u Department of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hulcr, Jiří $u School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
700    1_
$a Drozd, Pavel $u Department of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hrček, Jan $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 12 (2017), s. e0187803
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29236697 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404141956 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1287726 $s 1007053
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 12 $c 12 $d e0187803 $e 20171213 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...