-
Something wrong with this record ?
Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphological approach in the identification of host-parasitoid interactions
M. Šigut, M. Kostovčík, H. Šigutová, J. Hulcr, P. Drozd, J. Hrček,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Herbivory MeSH
- Hymenoptera growth & development MeSH
- Host-Parasite Interactions * MeSH
- Larva * MeSH
- Lepidoptera growth & development MeSH
- Plants parasitology MeSH
- DNA Barcoding, Taxonomic * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Understanding interactions between herbivores and parasitoids is essential for successful biodiversity protection and monitoring and for biological pest control. Morphological identifications employ insect rearing and are complicated by insects' high diversity and crypsis. DNA barcoding has been successfully used in studies of host-parasitoid interactions as it can substantially increase the recovered real host-parasitoid diversity distorted by overlooked species complexes, or by species with slight morphological differences. However, this approach does not allow the simultaneous detection and identification of host(s) and parasitoid(s). Recently, high-throughput sequencing has shown high potential for surveying ecological communities and trophic interactions. Using mock samples comprising insect larvae and their parasitoids, we tested the potential of DNA metabarcoding for identifying individuals involved in host-parasitoid interactions to different taxonomic levels, and compared it to standard DNA barcoding and morphological approaches. For DNA metabarcoding, we targeted the standard barcoding marker cytochrome oxidase subunit I using highly degenerate primers, 2*300 bp sequencing on a MiSeq platform, and RTAX classification using paired-end reads. Additionally, using a large host-parasitoid dataset from a Central European floodplain forest, we assess the completeness and usability of a local reference library by confronting the number of Barcoding Index Numbers obtained by standard barcoding with the number of morphotypes. Overall, metabarcoding recovery was high, identifying 92.8% of the taxa present in mock samples, and identification success within individual taxonomic levels did not significantly differ among metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphology. Based on the current local reference library, 39.4% parasitoid and 90.7% host taxa were identified to the species level. DNA barcoding estimated higher parasitoid diversity than morphotyping, especially in groups with high level of crypsis. This study suggests the potential of metabarcoding for effectively recovering host-parasitoid diversity, together with more accurate identifications obtained from building reliable and comprehensive reference libraries, especially for parasitoids.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18010241
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180404141916.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0187803 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29236697
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Šigut, Martin $u Department of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Performance of DNA metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphological approach in the identification of host-parasitoid interactions / $c M. Šigut, M. Kostovčík, H. Šigutová, J. Hulcr, P. Drozd, J. Hrček,
- 520 9_
- $a Understanding interactions between herbivores and parasitoids is essential for successful biodiversity protection and monitoring and for biological pest control. Morphological identifications employ insect rearing and are complicated by insects' high diversity and crypsis. DNA barcoding has been successfully used in studies of host-parasitoid interactions as it can substantially increase the recovered real host-parasitoid diversity distorted by overlooked species complexes, or by species with slight morphological differences. However, this approach does not allow the simultaneous detection and identification of host(s) and parasitoid(s). Recently, high-throughput sequencing has shown high potential for surveying ecological communities and trophic interactions. Using mock samples comprising insect larvae and their parasitoids, we tested the potential of DNA metabarcoding for identifying individuals involved in host-parasitoid interactions to different taxonomic levels, and compared it to standard DNA barcoding and morphological approaches. For DNA metabarcoding, we targeted the standard barcoding marker cytochrome oxidase subunit I using highly degenerate primers, 2*300 bp sequencing on a MiSeq platform, and RTAX classification using paired-end reads. Additionally, using a large host-parasitoid dataset from a Central European floodplain forest, we assess the completeness and usability of a local reference library by confronting the number of Barcoding Index Numbers obtained by standard barcoding with the number of morphotypes. Overall, metabarcoding recovery was high, identifying 92.8% of the taxa present in mock samples, and identification success within individual taxonomic levels did not significantly differ among metabarcoding, standard barcoding, and morphology. Based on the current local reference library, 39.4% parasitoid and 90.7% host taxa were identified to the species level. DNA barcoding estimated higher parasitoid diversity than morphotyping, especially in groups with high level of crypsis. This study suggests the potential of metabarcoding for effectively recovering host-parasitoid diversity, together with more accurate identifications obtained from building reliable and comprehensive reference libraries, especially for parasitoids.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a taxonomické DNA čárové kódování $7 D058893
- 650 _2
- $a býložravci $7 D060434
- 650 12
- $a interakce hostitele a parazita $7 D006790
- 650 _2
- $a Hymenoptera $x růst a vývoj $7 D006927
- 650 12
- $a larva $7 D007814
- 650 _2
- $a Lepidoptera $x růst a vývoj $7 D007915
- 650 _2
- $a rostliny $x parazitologie $7 D010944
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kostovčík, Martin $u Department of Genetics and Microbiology, Charles University in Prague, Praha, Czech Republic. BIOCEV, Institute of Microbiology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Vestec, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šigutová, Hana $u Department of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hulcr, Jiří $u School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America. Entomology and Nematology Department, University of Florida-IFAS, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
- 700 1_
- $a Drozd, Pavel $u Department of Biology and Ecology/Institute of Environmental Technologies, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hrček, Jan $u Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 12 (2017), s. e0187803
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29236697 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180404141956 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1287726 $s 1007053
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 12 $c 12 $d e0187803 $e 20171213 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404