-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Differences in fairness and trust between lean and corpulent men
B. Kubera, J. Klement, C. Wagner, C. Rädel, J. Eggeling, S. Füllbrunn, MC. Kaczmarek, R. Levinsky, A. Peters,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 2005 do Před 5 lety
ProQuest Central
od 2005-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library
od 1997-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2005-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
27485913
DOI
10.1038/ijo.2016.134
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- důvěra psychologie MeSH
- experimentální hry * MeSH
- glykemický clamp MeSH
- hubenost psychologie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- nadváha psychologie MeSH
- předsudek psychologie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- rozhodování * MeSH
- socioekonomické faktory MeSH
- výběr pracovníků * MeSH
- výběrové chování MeSH
- zaměstnanost psychologie statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- srovnávací studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Employment disparities are known to exist between lean and corpulent people, for example, corpulent people are less likely to be hired and get lower wages. The reasons for these disparities between weight groups are not completely understood. We hypothesize (i) that economic decision making differs between lean and corpulent subjects, (ii) that these differences are influenced by peoples' blood glucose concentrations and (iii) by the body weight of their opponents. METHODS: A total of 20 lean and 20 corpulent men were examined, who performed a large set of economic games (ultimatum game, trust game and risk game) under euglycemic and hypoglycemic conditions induced by the glucose clamp technique. RESULTS: In the ultimatum game, lean men made less fair decisions and offered 16% less money than corpulent men during euglycemia (P=0.042). During hypoglycemia, study participants of both weight groups accepted smaller amounts of money than during euglycemia (P=0.031), indicating that a lack of energy makes subjects to behave more like a Homo Economicus. In the trust game, lean men allocated twice as much money to lean than to corpulent trustees during hypoglycemia (P<0.001). Risk-seeking behavior did not differ between lean and corpulent men. CONCLUSION: Our data show that economic decision making is affected by both, the body weight of the participants and the body weight of their opponents, and that blood glucose concentrations should be taken into consideration when analyzing economic decision making. When relating these results to the working environment, the weight bias in economic decision making may be also relevant for employment disparities.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011089
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180418124914.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/ijo.2016.134 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27485913
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kubera, B $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Differences in fairness and trust between lean and corpulent men / $c B. Kubera, J. Klement, C. Wagner, C. Rädel, J. Eggeling, S. Füllbrunn, MC. Kaczmarek, R. Levinsky, A. Peters,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Employment disparities are known to exist between lean and corpulent people, for example, corpulent people are less likely to be hired and get lower wages. The reasons for these disparities between weight groups are not completely understood. We hypothesize (i) that economic decision making differs between lean and corpulent subjects, (ii) that these differences are influenced by peoples' blood glucose concentrations and (iii) by the body weight of their opponents. METHODS: A total of 20 lean and 20 corpulent men were examined, who performed a large set of economic games (ultimatum game, trust game and risk game) under euglycemic and hypoglycemic conditions induced by the glucose clamp technique. RESULTS: In the ultimatum game, lean men made less fair decisions and offered 16% less money than corpulent men during euglycemia (P=0.042). During hypoglycemia, study participants of both weight groups accepted smaller amounts of money than during euglycemia (P=0.031), indicating that a lack of energy makes subjects to behave more like a Homo Economicus. In the trust game, lean men allocated twice as much money to lean than to corpulent trustees during hypoglycemia (P<0.001). Risk-seeking behavior did not differ between lean and corpulent men. CONCLUSION: Our data show that economic decision making is affected by both, the body weight of the participants and the body weight of their opponents, and that blood glucose concentrations should be taken into consideration when analyzing economic decision making. When relating these results to the working environment, the weight bias in economic decision making may be also relevant for employment disparities.
- 650 _2
- $a výběrové chování $7 D002755
- 650 12
- $a rozhodování $7 D003657
- 650 _2
- $a zaměstnanost $x psychologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004651
- 650 12
- $a experimentální hry $7 D005717
- 650 _2
- $a glykemický clamp $7 D015309
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a nadváha $x psychologie $7 D050177
- 650 12
- $a výběr pracovníků $7 D010560
- 650 _2
- $a předsudek $x psychologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011287
- 650 _2
- $a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
- 650 _2
- $a hubenost $x psychologie $7 D013851
- 650 _2
- $a důvěra $x psychologie $7 D035502
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Klement, J $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Wagner, C $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Rädel, C $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Eggeling, J $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Füllbrunn, S $u Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. Department of Economics, Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- 700 1_
- $a Kaczmarek, M C $u Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. Department of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Levinsky, R $u Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. CERGE, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Peters, A $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00009902 $t International journal of obesity (2005) $x 1476-5497 $g Roč. 40, č. 11 (2016), s. 1802-1808
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27485913 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180418125013 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288574 $s 1007901
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 40 $c 11 $d 1802-1808 $e 20160803 $i 1476-5497 $m International journal of obesity $n Int J Obes (Lond) $x MED00009902
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404