• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Differences in fairness and trust between lean and corpulent men

B. Kubera, J. Klement, C. Wagner, C. Rädel, J. Eggeling, S. Füllbrunn, MC. Kaczmarek, R. Levinsky, A. Peters,

. 2016 ; 40 (11) : 1802-1808. [pub] 20160803

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011089
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2005 do Před 5 lety
ProQuest Central od 2005-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Open Access Digital Library od 1997-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2005-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 2005-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Public Health Database (ProQuest) od 2000-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

BACKGROUND: Employment disparities are known to exist between lean and corpulent people, for example, corpulent people are less likely to be hired and get lower wages. The reasons for these disparities between weight groups are not completely understood. We hypothesize (i) that economic decision making differs between lean and corpulent subjects, (ii) that these differences are influenced by peoples' blood glucose concentrations and (iii) by the body weight of their opponents. METHODS: A total of 20 lean and 20 corpulent men were examined, who performed a large set of economic games (ultimatum game, trust game and risk game) under euglycemic and hypoglycemic conditions induced by the glucose clamp technique. RESULTS: In the ultimatum game, lean men made less fair decisions and offered 16% less money than corpulent men during euglycemia (P=0.042). During hypoglycemia, study participants of both weight groups accepted smaller amounts of money than during euglycemia (P=0.031), indicating that a lack of energy makes subjects to behave more like a Homo Economicus. In the trust game, lean men allocated twice as much money to lean than to corpulent trustees during hypoglycemia (P<0.001). Risk-seeking behavior did not differ between lean and corpulent men. CONCLUSION: Our data show that economic decision making is affected by both, the body weight of the participants and the body weight of their opponents, and that blood glucose concentrations should be taken into consideration when analyzing economic decision making. When relating these results to the working environment, the weight bias in economic decision making may be also relevant for employment disparities.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011089
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180418124914.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1038/ijo.2016.134 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27485913
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kubera, B $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
245    10
$a Differences in fairness and trust between lean and corpulent men / $c B. Kubera, J. Klement, C. Wagner, C. Rädel, J. Eggeling, S. Füllbrunn, MC. Kaczmarek, R. Levinsky, A. Peters,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Employment disparities are known to exist between lean and corpulent people, for example, corpulent people are less likely to be hired and get lower wages. The reasons for these disparities between weight groups are not completely understood. We hypothesize (i) that economic decision making differs between lean and corpulent subjects, (ii) that these differences are influenced by peoples' blood glucose concentrations and (iii) by the body weight of their opponents. METHODS: A total of 20 lean and 20 corpulent men were examined, who performed a large set of economic games (ultimatum game, trust game and risk game) under euglycemic and hypoglycemic conditions induced by the glucose clamp technique. RESULTS: In the ultimatum game, lean men made less fair decisions and offered 16% less money than corpulent men during euglycemia (P=0.042). During hypoglycemia, study participants of both weight groups accepted smaller amounts of money than during euglycemia (P=0.031), indicating that a lack of energy makes subjects to behave more like a Homo Economicus. In the trust game, lean men allocated twice as much money to lean than to corpulent trustees during hypoglycemia (P<0.001). Risk-seeking behavior did not differ between lean and corpulent men. CONCLUSION: Our data show that economic decision making is affected by both, the body weight of the participants and the body weight of their opponents, and that blood glucose concentrations should be taken into consideration when analyzing economic decision making. When relating these results to the working environment, the weight bias in economic decision making may be also relevant for employment disparities.
650    _2
$a výběrové chování $7 D002755
650    12
$a rozhodování $7 D003657
650    _2
$a zaměstnanost $x psychologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D004651
650    12
$a experimentální hry $7 D005717
650    _2
$a glykemický clamp $7 D015309
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nadváha $x psychologie $7 D050177
650    12
$a výběr pracovníků $7 D010560
650    _2
$a předsudek $x psychologie $x statistika a číselné údaje $7 D011287
650    _2
$a socioekonomické faktory $7 D012959
650    _2
$a hubenost $x psychologie $7 D013851
650    _2
$a důvěra $x psychologie $7 D035502
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Klement, J $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
700    1_
$a Wagner, C $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
700    1_
$a Rädel, C $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
700    1_
$a Eggeling, J $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
700    1_
$a Füllbrunn, S $u Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. Department of Economics, Institute for Management Research, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Kaczmarek, M C $u Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. Department of Psychosocial Medicine and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
700    1_
$a Levinsky, R $u Max Planck Institute of Economics, Jena, Germany. CERGE, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Peters, A $u Medical Clinic 1, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00009902 $t International journal of obesity (2005) $x 1476-5497 $g Roč. 40, č. 11 (2016), s. 1802-1808
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27485913 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180418125013 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288574 $s 1007901
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 40 $c 11 $d 1802-1808 $e 20160803 $i 1476-5497 $m International journal of obesity $n Int J Obes (Lond) $x MED00009902
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...