Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face

AE. Kaipainen, KR. Sieber, RM. Nada, TJ. Maal, C. Katsaros, PS. Fudalej,

. 2016 ; 38 (6) : 602-608. [pub] 20151213

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

OBJECTIVE: Facial attractiveness is an important factor in our social interactions. It is still not entirely clear which factors influence the attractiveness of a face and facial asymmetry appears to play a certain role. The aim of the present study was to assess the association between facial attractiveness and regional facial asymmetries evaluated on three-dimensional (3D) images. METHODS: 3D facial images of 59 (23 male, 36 female) young adult patients (age 16-25 years) before orthodontic treatment were evaluated for asymmetry. The same 3D images were presented to 12 lay judges who rated the attractiveness of each subject on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Reliability of the method was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: All subjects showed a certain amount of asymmetry in all regions of the face; most asymmetry was found in the chin and cheek areas and less in the lip, nose and forehead areas. No statistically significant differences in regional facial asymmetries were found between male and female subjects (P > 0.05). Regression analyses demonstrated that the judgement of facial attractiveness was not influenced by absolute regional facial asymmetries when gender, facial width-to-height ratio and type of malocclusion were controlled (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS: A potential limitation of the study could be that other biologic and cultural factors influencing the perception of facial attractiveness were not controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: A small amount of asymmetry was present in all subjects assessed in this study, and asymmetry of this magnitude may not influence the assessment of facial attractiveness.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011323
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180417152847.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1093/ejo/cjv087 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26666568
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Kaipainen, Anu E $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
245    10
$a Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face / $c AE. Kaipainen, KR. Sieber, RM. Nada, TJ. Maal, C. Katsaros, PS. Fudalej,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Facial attractiveness is an important factor in our social interactions. It is still not entirely clear which factors influence the attractiveness of a face and facial asymmetry appears to play a certain role. The aim of the present study was to assess the association between facial attractiveness and regional facial asymmetries evaluated on three-dimensional (3D) images. METHODS: 3D facial images of 59 (23 male, 36 female) young adult patients (age 16-25 years) before orthodontic treatment were evaluated for asymmetry. The same 3D images were presented to 12 lay judges who rated the attractiveness of each subject on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Reliability of the method was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: All subjects showed a certain amount of asymmetry in all regions of the face; most asymmetry was found in the chin and cheek areas and less in the lip, nose and forehead areas. No statistically significant differences in regional facial asymmetries were found between male and female subjects (P > 0.05). Regression analyses demonstrated that the judgement of facial attractiveness was not influenced by absolute regional facial asymmetries when gender, facial width-to-height ratio and type of malocclusion were controlled (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS: A potential limitation of the study could be that other biologic and cultural factors influencing the perception of facial attractiveness were not controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: A small amount of asymmetry was present in all subjects assessed in this study, and asymmetry of this magnitude may not influence the assessment of facial attractiveness.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a anatomická značka $7 D059925
650    _2
$a postoj ke zdraví $7 D001294
650    _2
$a tvář $x patologie $7 D002610
650    _2
$a brada $x patologie $7 D002680
650    12
$a estetika stomatologická $7 D004955
650    _2
$a obličej $x patologie $7 D005145
650    _2
$a asymetrie obličeje $x patologie $x psychologie $7 D005146
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a čelo $x patologie $7 D005546
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
650    _2
$a mínění $7 D007600
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a malokluze $x patologie $7 D008310
650    _2
$a nos $x patologie $7 D009666
650    _2
$a fotogrammetrie $x metody $7 D010780
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sieber, Kevin R $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Nada, Rania M $u **Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait. ***Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
700    1_
$a Maal, Thomas J $u ****Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and.
700    1_
$a Katsaros, Christos $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Fudalej, Piotr S $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland, piotr.fudalej@zmk.unibe.ch. *****Department of Orthodontics, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001634 $t European journal of orthodontics $x 1460-2210 $g Roč. 38, č. 6 (2016), s. 602-608
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26666568 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180417152946 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288808 $s 1008135
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 38 $c 6 $d 602-608 $e 20151213 $i 1460-2210 $m European journal of orthodontics $n Eur J Orthod $x MED00001634
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...