-
Something wrong with this record ?
Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face
AE. Kaipainen, KR. Sieber, RM. Nada, TJ. Maal, C. Katsaros, PS. Fudalej,
Language English Country Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Free Medical Journals
from 1996 to 1 year ago
Open Access Digital Library
from 1996-01-01
PubMed
26666568
DOI
10.1093/ejo/cjv087
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Anatomic Landmarks MeSH
- Facial Asymmetry pathology psychology MeSH
- Chin pathology MeSH
- Forehead pathology MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Esthetics, Dental * MeSH
- Photogrammetry methods MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Malocclusion pathology MeSH
- Judgment MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Nose pathology MeSH
- Face pathology MeSH
- Attitude to Health MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Cheek pathology MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
OBJECTIVE: Facial attractiveness is an important factor in our social interactions. It is still not entirely clear which factors influence the attractiveness of a face and facial asymmetry appears to play a certain role. The aim of the present study was to assess the association between facial attractiveness and regional facial asymmetries evaluated on three-dimensional (3D) images. METHODS: 3D facial images of 59 (23 male, 36 female) young adult patients (age 16-25 years) before orthodontic treatment were evaluated for asymmetry. The same 3D images were presented to 12 lay judges who rated the attractiveness of each subject on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Reliability of the method was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: All subjects showed a certain amount of asymmetry in all regions of the face; most asymmetry was found in the chin and cheek areas and less in the lip, nose and forehead areas. No statistically significant differences in regional facial asymmetries were found between male and female subjects (P > 0.05). Regression analyses demonstrated that the judgement of facial attractiveness was not influenced by absolute regional facial asymmetries when gender, facial width-to-height ratio and type of malocclusion were controlled (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS: A potential limitation of the study could be that other biologic and cultural factors influencing the perception of facial attractiveness were not controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: A small amount of asymmetry was present in all subjects assessed in this study, and asymmetry of this magnitude may not influence the assessment of facial attractiveness.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011323
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180417152847.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1093/ejo/cjv087 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26666568
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Kaipainen, Anu E $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
- 245 10
- $a Regional facial asymmetries and attractiveness of the face / $c AE. Kaipainen, KR. Sieber, RM. Nada, TJ. Maal, C. Katsaros, PS. Fudalej,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVE: Facial attractiveness is an important factor in our social interactions. It is still not entirely clear which factors influence the attractiveness of a face and facial asymmetry appears to play a certain role. The aim of the present study was to assess the association between facial attractiveness and regional facial asymmetries evaluated on three-dimensional (3D) images. METHODS: 3D facial images of 59 (23 male, 36 female) young adult patients (age 16-25 years) before orthodontic treatment were evaluated for asymmetry. The same 3D images were presented to 12 lay judges who rated the attractiveness of each subject on a 100mm visual analogue scale. Reliability of the method was assessed with Bland-Altman plots and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: All subjects showed a certain amount of asymmetry in all regions of the face; most asymmetry was found in the chin and cheek areas and less in the lip, nose and forehead areas. No statistically significant differences in regional facial asymmetries were found between male and female subjects (P > 0.05). Regression analyses demonstrated that the judgement of facial attractiveness was not influenced by absolute regional facial asymmetries when gender, facial width-to-height ratio and type of malocclusion were controlled (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS: A potential limitation of the study could be that other biologic and cultural factors influencing the perception of facial attractiveness were not controlled for. CONCLUSIONS: A small amount of asymmetry was present in all subjects assessed in this study, and asymmetry of this magnitude may not influence the assessment of facial attractiveness.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a anatomická značka $7 D059925
- 650 _2
- $a postoj ke zdraví $7 D001294
- 650 _2
- $a tvář $x patologie $7 D002610
- 650 _2
- $a brada $x patologie $7 D002680
- 650 12
- $a estetika stomatologická $7 D004955
- 650 _2
- $a obličej $x patologie $7 D005145
- 650 _2
- $a asymetrie obličeje $x patologie $x psychologie $7 D005146
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a čelo $x patologie $7 D005546
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $x metody $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a mínění $7 D007600
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a malokluze $x patologie $7 D008310
- 650 _2
- $a nos $x patologie $7 D009666
- 650 _2
- $a fotogrammetrie $x metody $7 D010780
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Sieber, Kevin R $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Nada, Rania M $u **Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait. ***Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
- 700 1_
- $a Maal, Thomas J $u ****Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and.
- 700 1_
- $a Katsaros, Christos $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Fudalej, Piotr S $u *Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, University of Bern, Switzerland, piotr.fudalej@zmk.unibe.ch. *****Department of Orthodontics, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001634 $t European journal of orthodontics $x 1460-2210 $g Roč. 38, č. 6 (2016), s. 602-608
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26666568 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180417152946 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288808 $s 1008135
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 38 $c 6 $d 602-608 $e 20151213 $i 1460-2210 $m European journal of orthodontics $n Eur J Orthod $x MED00001634
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404