Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

A new approach to the evaluation of local muscular load while typing on a keyboard

A. Schlenker, T. Tichý

. 2017 ; 25 (4) : 255-260.

Language English Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online Full text

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2004
ProQuest Central from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2006-03-01 to 6 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
Public Health Database (ProQuest) from 2009-03-01 to 6 months ago
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources from 1993

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of using keystroke dynamics (KD) in combination with integrated electromyography (iEMG) for the objective evaluation of local muscular load of hands and forearms while typing on a computer keyboard and to compare it with results of the commonly used method. METHOD: Study was performed on 12 subjects. Data were collected using our own application for capturing KD data and using EMG Holter for detecting electromyographic potentials to determine local muscular load. RESULTS: The results of our study revealed that currently used methods for assessment of the workload while typing on a computer keyboard are not entirely accurate. In particular, the real total number of keystrokes performed during processing of a text is significantly higher than the count of characters the text is consisting of. In addition to this count, also the so-called invisible keys, keyboard shortcuts, and especially corrections in the typed text must be taken into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that all probands in our study exceeded the valid hygienic limits for the total amount of the small repetitive movements of the hands and forearms and the total amount of the keyboard typing movements. Most of the probands in our study also exceeded the valid hygienic limit for the highest average time-weighted value of the percent maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC). This implies that the keystroke dynamics method has a great potential to increase the accuracy of evaluation of local muscular load when using the keyboard and thus to improve the existing methodology for investigation of occupational diseases resulting from overload while working on the computer.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016084
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180531075320.0
007      
ta
008      
180514s2017 xr d f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.21101/cejph.a5105 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29346845
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Schlenker, Anna, $d 1986- $7 xx0224780 $u Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Biomedical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Kladno, Czech Republic
245    12
$a A new approach to the evaluation of local muscular load while typing on a keyboard / $c A. Schlenker, T. Tichý
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of using keystroke dynamics (KD) in combination with integrated electromyography (iEMG) for the objective evaluation of local muscular load of hands and forearms while typing on a computer keyboard and to compare it with results of the commonly used method. METHOD: Study was performed on 12 subjects. Data were collected using our own application for capturing KD data and using EMG Holter for detecting electromyographic potentials to determine local muscular load. RESULTS: The results of our study revealed that currently used methods for assessment of the workload while typing on a computer keyboard are not entirely accurate. In particular, the real total number of keystrokes performed during processing of a text is significantly higher than the count of characters the text is consisting of. In addition to this count, also the so-called invisible keys, keyboard shortcuts, and especially corrections in the typed text must be taken into consideration. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicated that all probands in our study exceeded the valid hygienic limits for the total amount of the small repetitive movements of the hands and forearms and the total amount of the keyboard typing movements. Most of the probands in our study also exceeded the valid hygienic limit for the highest average time-weighted value of the percent maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC). This implies that the keystroke dynamics method has a great potential to increase the accuracy of evaluation of local muscular load when using the keyboard and thus to improve the existing methodology for investigation of occupational diseases resulting from overload while working on the computer.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a počítače $7 D003201
650    _2
$a elektromyografie $x metody $7 D004576
650    _2
$a ergonomie $x metody $7 D006804
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a předloktí $x fyziologie $7 D005542
650    _2
$a ruka $x fyziologie $7 D006225
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a kosterní svaly $x fyziologie $7 D018482
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Tichý, Tomáš $u National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic $7 xx0224708
773    0_
$w MED00001083 $t Central European journal of public health $x 1210-7778 $g Roč. 25, č. 4 (2017), s. 255-260
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29346845 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b B 1829 $c 562 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20180514 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180531075515 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1303703 $s 1012924
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 25 $c 4 $d 255-260 $i 1210-7778 $m Central European Journal of Public Health $n Cent. Eur. J. Public Health $x MED00001083
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20180514

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...