-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction in broilers
L. Li, C. Pielsticker, Z. Han, T. Kubasová, I. Rychlik, B. Kaspers, S. Rautenschlein,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2009-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2009
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2009
Free Medical Journals
od 2009
PubMed Central
od 2009
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2009
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2009-12-01
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their pathogenesis. To investigate the effect of IBDV-induced immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, broiler chickens were inoculated with a very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV at 14 days post hatch followed by C. jejuni inoculation at 7 (Experiment A) or 9 (Experiment B) days post virus (IBDV) inoculation. Results: vvIBDV-infection led to a depression in caecal lamina propria B lymphocytes and the anti-C. jejuni-antibody response starting at 14 days post C. jejuni inoculation (pbi). The C. jejuni-colonization pattern was comparable between mono-inoculated groups of both experiments, but it varied for vvIBDV + C. jejuni co-inoculated groups. In Experiment A significant higher numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of C. jejuni were detected in the caecum of co-inoculated birds compared to C. jejuni-mono-inoculated birds in the early phase after C. jejuni-inoculation. In Experiment B the clearance phase was affected in the co-inoculated group with significantly higher CFU at 21 days pbi compared to the mono-inoculated group (P < 0.05). No major differences were seen in numbers local lamina propria T lymphocyte populations between C. jejuni-inoculated groups with or without vvIBDV-infection. Interestingly, both pathogens affected the microbiota composition. The consequences of these microflora changes for the host have to be elucidated further. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the timing between viral and bacterial infection might affect the outcome of C. jejuni colonization differently. Our results confirm previous studies that anti-Campylobacter-antibodies may specifically be important for the clearance phase of the bacteria. Therefore, as vvIBDV is widely distributed in the field, it may have a significant impact on the colonization and shedding rate of C. jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Subsequently, successful IBDV-control strategies may indirectly also benefit the gut-health of chickens.
Clinic for Poultry University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover Bünteweg 17 30559 Hannover Germany
Veterinary Research Institute Hudcova 70 621 00 Brno Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024142
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180716095216.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29610580
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Li, Li $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction in broilers / $c L. Li, C. Pielsticker, Z. Han, T. Kubasová, I. Rychlik, B. Kaspers, S. Rautenschlein,
- 520 9_
- $a Background: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their pathogenesis. To investigate the effect of IBDV-induced immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, broiler chickens were inoculated with a very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV at 14 days post hatch followed by C. jejuni inoculation at 7 (Experiment A) or 9 (Experiment B) days post virus (IBDV) inoculation. Results: vvIBDV-infection led to a depression in caecal lamina propria B lymphocytes and the anti-C. jejuni-antibody response starting at 14 days post C. jejuni inoculation (pbi). The C. jejuni-colonization pattern was comparable between mono-inoculated groups of both experiments, but it varied for vvIBDV + C. jejuni co-inoculated groups. In Experiment A significant higher numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of C. jejuni were detected in the caecum of co-inoculated birds compared to C. jejuni-mono-inoculated birds in the early phase after C. jejuni-inoculation. In Experiment B the clearance phase was affected in the co-inoculated group with significantly higher CFU at 21 days pbi compared to the mono-inoculated group (P < 0.05). No major differences were seen in numbers local lamina propria T lymphocyte populations between C. jejuni-inoculated groups with or without vvIBDV-infection. Interestingly, both pathogens affected the microbiota composition. The consequences of these microflora changes for the host have to be elucidated further. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the timing between viral and bacterial infection might affect the outcome of C. jejuni colonization differently. Our results confirm previous studies that anti-Campylobacter-antibodies may specifically be important for the clearance phase of the bacteria. Therefore, as vvIBDV is widely distributed in the field, it may have a significant impact on the colonization and shedding rate of C. jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Subsequently, successful IBDV-control strategies may indirectly also benefit the gut-health of chickens.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Pielsticker, Colin $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Han, Zifeng $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Kubasová, Tereza $u 2Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rychlik, Ivan $u 2Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kaspers, Bernd $u 3Department for Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Veterinastr. 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Rautenschlein, Silke $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00175588 $t Gut pathogens $x 1757-4749 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2018), s. 13
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29610580 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180716095514 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1316129 $s 1021060
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 10 $c - $d 13 $e 20180330 $i 1757-4749 $m Gut pathogens $n Gut Pathog $x MED00175588
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709