• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction in broilers

L. Li, C. Pielsticker, Z. Han, T. Kubasová, I. Rychlik, B. Kaspers, S. Rautenschlein,

. 2018 ; 10 (-) : 13. [pub] 20180330

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024142

Background: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their pathogenesis. To investigate the effect of IBDV-induced immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, broiler chickens were inoculated with a very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV at 14 days post hatch followed by C. jejuni inoculation at 7 (Experiment A) or 9 (Experiment B) days post virus (IBDV) inoculation. Results: vvIBDV-infection led to a depression in caecal lamina propria B lymphocytes and the anti-C. jejuni-antibody response starting at 14 days post C. jejuni inoculation (pbi). The C. jejuni-colonization pattern was comparable between mono-inoculated groups of both experiments, but it varied for vvIBDV + C. jejuni co-inoculated groups. In Experiment A significant higher numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of C. jejuni were detected in the caecum of co-inoculated birds compared to C. jejuni-mono-inoculated birds in the early phase after C. jejuni-inoculation. In Experiment B the clearance phase was affected in the co-inoculated group with significantly higher CFU at 21 days pbi compared to the mono-inoculated group (P < 0.05). No major differences were seen in numbers local lamina propria T lymphocyte populations between C. jejuni-inoculated groups with or without vvIBDV-infection. Interestingly, both pathogens affected the microbiota composition. The consequences of these microflora changes for the host have to be elucidated further. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the timing between viral and bacterial infection might affect the outcome of C. jejuni colonization differently. Our results confirm previous studies that anti-Campylobacter-antibodies may specifically be important for the clearance phase of the bacteria. Therefore, as vvIBDV is widely distributed in the field, it may have a significant impact on the colonization and shedding rate of C. jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Subsequently, successful IBDV-control strategies may indirectly also benefit the gut-health of chickens.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024142
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180716095216.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1186/s13099-018-0241-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29610580
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Li, Li $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
245    10
$a Infectious bursal disease virus inoculation infection modifies Campylobacter jejuni-host interaction in broilers / $c L. Li, C. Pielsticker, Z. Han, T. Kubasová, I. Rychlik, B. Kaspers, S. Rautenschlein,
520    9_
$a Background: Campylobacter jejuni is considered as a chicken commensal. The gut microbiota and the immune status of the host may affect its colonization. Infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) is an immunosuppressive virus of chickens, which allows secondary pathogens to invade or exacerbates their pathogenesis. To investigate the effect of IBDV-induced immunosuppression on the pathogenesis of C. jejuni, broiler chickens were inoculated with a very virulent (vv) strain of IBDV at 14 days post hatch followed by C. jejuni inoculation at 7 (Experiment A) or 9 (Experiment B) days post virus (IBDV) inoculation. Results: vvIBDV-infection led to a depression in caecal lamina propria B lymphocytes and the anti-C. jejuni-antibody response starting at 14 days post C. jejuni inoculation (pbi). The C. jejuni-colonization pattern was comparable between mono-inoculated groups of both experiments, but it varied for vvIBDV + C. jejuni co-inoculated groups. In Experiment A significant higher numbers of colony forming units (CFU) of C. jejuni were detected in the caecum of co-inoculated birds compared to C. jejuni-mono-inoculated birds in the early phase after C. jejuni-inoculation. In Experiment B the clearance phase was affected in the co-inoculated group with significantly higher CFU at 21 days pbi compared to the mono-inoculated group (P < 0.05). No major differences were seen in numbers local lamina propria T lymphocyte populations between C. jejuni-inoculated groups with or without vvIBDV-infection. Interestingly, both pathogens affected the microbiota composition. The consequences of these microflora changes for the host have to be elucidated further. Conclusion: Our data suggests that the timing between viral and bacterial infection might affect the outcome of C. jejuni colonization differently. Our results confirm previous studies that anti-Campylobacter-antibodies may specifically be important for the clearance phase of the bacteria. Therefore, as vvIBDV is widely distributed in the field, it may have a significant impact on the colonization and shedding rate of C. jejuni in commercial poultry flocks. Subsequently, successful IBDV-control strategies may indirectly also benefit the gut-health of chickens.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Pielsticker, Colin $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
700    1_
$a Han, Zifeng $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
700    1_
$a Kubasová, Tereza $u 2Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u 2Veterinary Research Institute, Hudcova 70, 621 00 Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kaspers, Bernd $u 3Department for Veterinary Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Veterinastr. 13, 80539 Munich, Germany.
700    1_
$a Rautenschlein, Silke $u 1Clinic for Poultry, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Bünteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00175588 $t Gut pathogens $x 1757-4749 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2018), s. 13
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29610580 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180716095514 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1316129 $s 1021060
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 10 $c - $d 13 $e 20180330 $i 1757-4749 $m Gut pathogens $n Gut Pathog $x MED00175588
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...