Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Classification of Culturable Bifidobacterial Population from Colonic Samples of Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) Based on Three Molecular Genetic Methods

R. Pechar, J. Killer, C. Mekadim, M. Geigerová, V. Rada,

. 2017 ; 74 (11) : 1324-1331. [pub] 20170729

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) from 2000-01-01 to 1 year ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-01-01 to 1 year ago

Occurrence of bifidobacteria, known as health-promoting probiotic microorganisms, in the digestive tract of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) has not been examined yet. One hundred forty-nine fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase positive bacterial strains were isolated from colonic content of twenty-two individuals of wild pigs originated from four localities in the Czechia. Based on PCR-DGGE technique targeting the variable V3 region of the 16S rRNA genes, strains were initially differentiated into four groups represented by: (i) probably a new Bifidobacterium species (89 strains), (ii) B. boum/B. thermophilum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. thermacidophilum (sub)species (49 strains), (iii) Pseudoscardovia suis (7 strains), and (iv) B. pseudolongum subsp. globosum/B. pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum (4 strains), respectively. Given the fact that DGGE technique did not allow to differentiate the representatives of thermophilic bifidobacteria and B. pseudolongum subspecies, strains were further classified by the 16S rRNA and thrS gene sequences. Primers targeting the variable regions of the latter gene were designed to be applicable in identification and phylogeny of Bifidobacteriaceae family. The 16S rRNA-derived phylogenetic study classified members of the first group into five subgroups in a separated cluster of thermophilic bifidobacteria. Comparable results were obtained by the thrS-derived phylogenetic analysis. Remarkably, variability among thrS sequences was higher compared with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Overall, molecular genetic techniques application allowed to identify a new Bifidobacterium phylotype which is predominant in the digestive tract of examined wild pigs.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024782
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180712093832.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00284-017-1320-0 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28756573
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pechar, Radko $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Suchdol, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic. Food Research Institute Prague, Radiová 1285/7, Hostivař, 102 00, Prague 10, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Classification of Culturable Bifidobacterial Population from Colonic Samples of Wild Pigs (Sus scrofa) Based on Three Molecular Genetic Methods / $c R. Pechar, J. Killer, C. Mekadim, M. Geigerová, V. Rada,
520    9_
$a Occurrence of bifidobacteria, known as health-promoting probiotic microorganisms, in the digestive tract of wild pigs (Sus scrofa) has not been examined yet. One hundred forty-nine fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase positive bacterial strains were isolated from colonic content of twenty-two individuals of wild pigs originated from four localities in the Czechia. Based on PCR-DGGE technique targeting the variable V3 region of the 16S rRNA genes, strains were initially differentiated into four groups represented by: (i) probably a new Bifidobacterium species (89 strains), (ii) B. boum/B. thermophilum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. porcinum/B. thermacidophilum subsp. thermacidophilum (sub)species (49 strains), (iii) Pseudoscardovia suis (7 strains), and (iv) B. pseudolongum subsp. globosum/B. pseudolongum subsp. pseudolongum (4 strains), respectively. Given the fact that DGGE technique did not allow to differentiate the representatives of thermophilic bifidobacteria and B. pseudolongum subspecies, strains were further classified by the 16S rRNA and thrS gene sequences. Primers targeting the variable regions of the latter gene were designed to be applicable in identification and phylogeny of Bifidobacteriaceae family. The 16S rRNA-derived phylogenetic study classified members of the first group into five subgroups in a separated cluster of thermophilic bifidobacteria. Comparable results were obtained by the thrS-derived phylogenetic analysis. Remarkably, variability among thrS sequences was higher compared with 16S rRNA gene sequences. Overall, molecular genetic techniques application allowed to identify a new Bifidobacterium phylotype which is predominant in the digestive tract of examined wild pigs.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a divoká zvířata $7 D000835
650    _2
$a Bifidobacterium $x chemie $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001644
650    _2
$a gastrointestinální trakt $x mikrobiologie $7 D041981
650    _2
$a bakteriální geny $7 D005798
650    12
$a molekulární typizace $x metody $7 D058889
650    _2
$a fylogeneze $7 D010802
650    _2
$a RNA ribozomální 16S $x genetika $7 D012336
650    _2
$a sekvenční analýza DNA $7 D017422
650    _2
$a Sus scrofa $x mikrobiologie $7 D034421
650    _2
$a prasata $7 D013552
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Killer, Jiří $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Suchdol, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic. killer.jiri@seznam.cz. Institute of Animal Physiology and Genetics v.v.i, Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, Krč, 142 20, Prague 4, Czech Republic. killer.jiri@seznam.cz.
700    1_
$a Mekadim, Chahrazed $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Suchdol, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Geigerová, Martina $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Suchdol, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rada, Vojtěch $u Department of Microbiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences, Kamýcká 129, Suchdol, 165 00, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001275 $t Current microbiology $x 1432-0991 $g Roč. 74, č. 11 (2017), s. 1324-1331
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28756573 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180712094124 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316913 $s 1021703
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 74 $c 11 $d 1324-1331 $e 20170729 $i 1432-0991 $m Current microbiology $n Curr Microbiol $x MED00001275
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...