Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Chromatic pupillography in hemianopia patients with homonymous visual field defects

F. Maeda, C. Kelbsch, T. Straßer, K. Skorkovská, T. Peters, B. Wilhelm, H. Wilhelm,

. 2017 ; 255 (9) : 1837-1842. [pub] 20170630

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024863
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 1997-10-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2009-07-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 1997-10-01 do Před 1 rokem

PURPOSE: The pupil light reflex is considered to be a simple subcortical reflex. However, many studies have proven that patients with isolated occipital lesions with homonymous hemianopia show pupillary hemihypokinesia. Our hypothesis is that the afferent pupillary system consists of two pathways: one via intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), the other running through the normal RGCs via the visual cortex. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis of these two separate pupillomotor pathways. METHODS: 12 patients (59.1 ± 18.8 years) with homonymous hemianopia due to post-geniculate lesions of the visual pathway and 20 normal controls (58.6 ± 12.9 years) were examined using chromatic pupillography: stimulus intensity was 28 lx corneal illumination, stimulus duration was 4.0 s, and the stimulus wavelengths were 420 ± 20 nm (blue) and 605 ± 20 nm (red), respectively. The examined parameters were baseline pupil diameter, latency, and relative amplitudes (absolute amplitudes compared to baseline), measured at maximal constriction, at 3 s after stimulus onset, at stimulus offset, and at 3 s and 7 s after stimulus offset. RESULTS: The relative amplitudes for the red stimulus were significantly smaller for hemianopia patients compared to the normal controls [maximal constriction: 35.6 ± 5.9% (hemianopia) to 42.3 ± 5.7% (normal); p = 0.004; 3 s after stimulus onset: p = 0.004; stimulus offset: p = 0.001]. No significant differences in any parameter were found between the two groups using the blue stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that the ipRGC pathway is mainly subcortical, whereas a second, non-ipRGC pathway via the occipital cortex exists.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024863
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180716094959.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00417-017-3721-y $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28687871
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Maeda, Fumiatsu $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Department of Orthoptics and Visual Sciences, Faculty of Medical Technology, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
245    10
$a Chromatic pupillography in hemianopia patients with homonymous visual field defects / $c F. Maeda, C. Kelbsch, T. Straßer, K. Skorkovská, T. Peters, B. Wilhelm, H. Wilhelm,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: The pupil light reflex is considered to be a simple subcortical reflex. However, many studies have proven that patients with isolated occipital lesions with homonymous hemianopia show pupillary hemihypokinesia. Our hypothesis is that the afferent pupillary system consists of two pathways: one via intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs), the other running through the normal RGCs via the visual cortex. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis of these two separate pupillomotor pathways. METHODS: 12 patients (59.1 ± 18.8 years) with homonymous hemianopia due to post-geniculate lesions of the visual pathway and 20 normal controls (58.6 ± 12.9 years) were examined using chromatic pupillography: stimulus intensity was 28 lx corneal illumination, stimulus duration was 4.0 s, and the stimulus wavelengths were 420 ± 20 nm (blue) and 605 ± 20 nm (red), respectively. The examined parameters were baseline pupil diameter, latency, and relative amplitudes (absolute amplitudes compared to baseline), measured at maximal constriction, at 3 s after stimulus onset, at stimulus offset, and at 3 s and 7 s after stimulus offset. RESULTS: The relative amplitudes for the red stimulus were significantly smaller for hemianopia patients compared to the normal controls [maximal constriction: 35.6 ± 5.9% (hemianopia) to 42.3 ± 5.7% (normal); p = 0.004; 3 s after stimulus onset: p = 0.004; stimulus offset: p = 0.001]. No significant differences in any parameter were found between the two groups using the blue stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the hypothesis that the ipRGC pathway is mainly subcortical, whereas a second, non-ipRGC pathway via the occipital cortex exists.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a nemoci mozku $x komplikace $x diagnóza $7 D001927
650    12
$a diagnostické techniky oftalmologické $7 D003941
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a hemianopsie $x diagnóza $x etiologie $x patofyziologie $7 D006423
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $7 D008279
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mezencefalon $x diagnostické zobrazování $7 D008636
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a světelná stimulace $7 D010775
650    _2
$a pupila $x fyziologie $7 D011680
650    _2
$a reflex pupilární $x fyziologie $7 D012025
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a retinální gangliové buňky $x fyziologie $7 D012165
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
650    _2
$a zrakové korové centrum $x diagnostické zobrazování $x patofyziologie $7 D014793
650    _2
$a zraková pole $x fyziologie $7 D014794
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kelbsch, Carina $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Straßer, Torsten $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Institute for Ophthalmic Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Skorkovská, Karolína $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. Department of Optometry and Orthoptics, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Peters, Tobias $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Wilhelm, Barbara $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Wilhelm, Helmut $u Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. helmut.wilhelm@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
773    0_
$w MED00001940 $t Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie $x 1435-702X $g Roč. 255, č. 9 (2017), s. 1837-1842
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28687871 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180716095257 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316994 $s 1021784
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 255 $c 9 $d 1837-1842 $e 20170630 $i 1435-702X $m Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology $n Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol $x MED00001940
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...