-
Something wrong with this record ?
Measuring quality of life of cognitively impaired elderly inpatients in palliative care: psychometric properties of the QUALID and CILQ scales
R. Bužgová, R. Kozáková, L. Sikorová, D. Jarošová,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article
Grant support
NT13417
MZ0
CEP Register
- MeSH
- Cognitive Dysfunction psychology MeSH
- Quality of Life psychology MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Palliative Care psychology MeSH
- Cross-Sectional Studies MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires standards MeSH
- Psychometrics instrumentation MeSH
- Reproducibility of Results MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- Czech Republic MeSH
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Czech versions of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID) and the Cognitively Impaired Life Quality (CILQ) scales for use in the palliative care setting in terminally ill patients with cognitive impairment. METHODS: The sample comprised 306 cognitively impaired inpatients with advanced cancer and non-cancer conditions. In this cross-sectional study, two Quality of Life (QoL) measurements were performed at baseline and after five days. The dimensionality of the QUALID and CILQ scales was evaluated using a principal component analysis with Varimax rotation. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha; inter-rater reliability was evaluated with Kappa index. Test-retest stability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) comparing scores from baseline and 3-5 days post-baseline. The construct validity of the QUALID and CILQ scale was established by Spearman's correlation coefficients with the Symptom Management at the End-of-Life in Dementia (SM-EOLD). RESULTS: Both scales were shown to have adequate validity and reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.812 for QUALID, and α = 0.73 for CILQ), good inter-rater agreement (QUALID: κ = 0.760; CILQ: κ = 0.801) as well as test-retest reliability (QUALID: ICC = 0.847; CILQ: ICC = 0.925). CONCLUSION: The Czech versions of the QUALID and CILQ scales may be recommended for use in the Czech Republic in the area of palliative care.
Department of Nursing and Midwifery Faculty of Medicine University of Ostrava Ostrava Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18025322
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190521113003.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1080/13607863.2016.1220919 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27565013
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bužgová, Radka, $u Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Ostrava , Ostrava , Czech Republic. $d 1975- $7 mzk2007395062
- 245 10
- $a Measuring quality of life of cognitively impaired elderly inpatients in palliative care: psychometric properties of the QUALID and CILQ scales / $c R. Bužgová, R. Kozáková, L. Sikorová, D. Jarošová,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Czech versions of the Quality of Life in Late-Stage Dementia (QUALID) and the Cognitively Impaired Life Quality (CILQ) scales for use in the palliative care setting in terminally ill patients with cognitive impairment. METHODS: The sample comprised 306 cognitively impaired inpatients with advanced cancer and non-cancer conditions. In this cross-sectional study, two Quality of Life (QoL) measurements were performed at baseline and after five days. The dimensionality of the QUALID and CILQ scales was evaluated using a principal component analysis with Varimax rotation. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha; inter-rater reliability was evaluated with Kappa index. Test-retest stability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) comparing scores from baseline and 3-5 days post-baseline. The construct validity of the QUALID and CILQ scale was established by Spearman's correlation coefficients with the Symptom Management at the End-of-Life in Dementia (SM-EOLD). RESULTS: Both scales were shown to have adequate validity and reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.812 for QUALID, and α = 0.73 for CILQ), good inter-rater agreement (QUALID: κ = 0.760; CILQ: κ = 0.801) as well as test-retest reliability (QUALID: ICC = 0.847; CILQ: ICC = 0.925). CONCLUSION: The Czech versions of the QUALID and CILQ scales may be recommended for use in the Czech Republic in the area of palliative care.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a kognitivní dysfunkce $x psychologie $7 D060825
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a paliativní péče $x psychologie $7 D010166
- 650 _2
- $a psychometrie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D011594
- 650 _2
- $a kvalita života $x psychologie $7 D011788
- 650 _2
- $a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $x normy $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kozáková, Radka $u Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Ostrava , Ostrava , Czech Republic. $7 mzk2012704116
- 700 1_
- $a Sikorová, Lucie, $u Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Ostrava , Ostrava , Czech Republic. $d 1975- $7 mzk2008473037
- 700 1_
- $a Jarošová, Darja $u Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine , University of Ostrava , Ostrava , Czech Republic. $7 ola2004192486
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006170 $t Aging & mental health $x 1364-6915 $g Roč. 21, č. 12 (2017), s. 1287-1293
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27565013 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190521113117 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317453 $s 1022243
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 21 $c 12 $d 1287-1293 $e 20160826 $i 1364-6915 $m Aging & mental health $n Aging Ment Health $x MED00006170
- GRA __
- $a NT13417 $p MZ0
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709