-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
P16 is a useful supplemental diagnostic marker of pulmonary small cell carcinoma in small biopsies and cytology specimens
M. Švajdler, R. Mezencev, O. Ondič, B. Šašková, P. Mukenšnábl, M. Michal,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- biopsie MeSH
- diferenciální diagnóza MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- geny p16 fyziologie MeSH
- imunohistochemie metody MeSH
- karcinoid diagnóza patologie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- malobuněčný karcinom diagnóza patologie MeSH
- nádorové biomarkery metabolismus MeSH
- nádory plic patologie MeSH
- nemalobuněčný karcinom plic patologie MeSH
- plíce patologie MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- spinocelulární karcinom diagnóza patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- senioři nad 80 let MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Pulmonary small cell carcinoma (SCLC) is usually diagnosed in small biopsy or cytological specimens based on cytomorphology; however in ambiguous cases diagnosis requires additional support by immunohistochemistry. While TP53 and RB1 alterations with secondary overexpression of p16 are mainstay events in SCLC pathogenesis, diagnostic value of p16-positivity in the diagnosis of SCLC has not yet been fully investigated. We examined the expression of p16, CD56, synaptophysin (SYP), chromogranin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) in a series of pulmonary and extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas, pulmonary carcinoids and non-small cell lung carcinomas, and compared diagnostic performance of these markers in the diagnosis of SCLC. P16 was positive in 95 of 101 SCLCs, and displayed highest diagnostic sensitivity of ~94%. Composite biomarkers CD56+p16+TTF1 and CD56+p16+SYP were both able to detect correctly all SCLC cases. Importantly, three (~3%) SCLC cases completely negative for all conventional markers displayed diffuse positivity for p16. CD56 and p16 demonstrated highest concordance between paired small biopsy and cytology specimens. 50% of squamous cell carcinomas, ~41% of adenocarcinoma/NSCLC-favour adenocarcinoma cases, and ~93% of extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas also showed p16-positivity. Combination of CD56, p16 and TTF1 produced diagnostic classifier that outperformed best single marker CD56 in differential diagnosis between SCLC and NSCLC. In conclusion, in the appropriate morphological context p16 represents a useful supplementary marker for diagnosis of SCLC, even in cases where only cytological material is available.
Bioptická laboratoř s r o Pilsen Czech Republic
School of Biological Sciences Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA USA
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18033227
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181022115752.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2017.11.008 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29566943
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Švajdler, Marián $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic. Electronic address: svajdler@biopticka.cz.
- 245 10
- $a P16 is a useful supplemental diagnostic marker of pulmonary small cell carcinoma in small biopsies and cytology specimens / $c M. Švajdler, R. Mezencev, O. Ondič, B. Šašková, P. Mukenšnábl, M. Michal,
- 520 9_
- $a Pulmonary small cell carcinoma (SCLC) is usually diagnosed in small biopsy or cytological specimens based on cytomorphology; however in ambiguous cases diagnosis requires additional support by immunohistochemistry. While TP53 and RB1 alterations with secondary overexpression of p16 are mainstay events in SCLC pathogenesis, diagnostic value of p16-positivity in the diagnosis of SCLC has not yet been fully investigated. We examined the expression of p16, CD56, synaptophysin (SYP), chromogranin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) in a series of pulmonary and extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas, pulmonary carcinoids and non-small cell lung carcinomas, and compared diagnostic performance of these markers in the diagnosis of SCLC. P16 was positive in 95 of 101 SCLCs, and displayed highest diagnostic sensitivity of ~94%. Composite biomarkers CD56+p16+TTF1 and CD56+p16+SYP were both able to detect correctly all SCLC cases. Importantly, three (~3%) SCLC cases completely negative for all conventional markers displayed diffuse positivity for p16. CD56 and p16 demonstrated highest concordance between paired small biopsy and cytology specimens. 50% of squamous cell carcinomas, ~41% of adenocarcinoma/NSCLC-favour adenocarcinoma cases, and ~93% of extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas also showed p16-positivity. Combination of CD56, p16 and TTF1 produced diagnostic classifier that outperformed best single marker CD56 in differential diagnosis between SCLC and NSCLC. In conclusion, in the appropriate morphological context p16 represents a useful supplementary marker for diagnosis of SCLC, even in cases where only cytological material is available.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a nádorové biomarkery $x metabolismus $7 D014408
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $7 D001706
- 650 _2
- $a karcinoid $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D002276
- 650 _2
- $a nemalobuněčný karcinom plic $x patologie $7 D002289
- 650 _2
- $a malobuněčný karcinom $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D018288
- 650 _2
- $a spinocelulární karcinom $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D002294
- 650 _2
- $a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a geny p16 $x fyziologie $7 D019942
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a imunohistochemie $x metody $7 D007150
- 650 _2
- $a plíce $x patologie $7 D008168
- 650 _2
- $a nádory plic $x patologie $7 D008175
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Mezencev, Roman $u School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
- 700 1_
- $a Ondič, Ondrej $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Šašková, Bohuslava $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mukenšnábl, Petr $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Michal, Michal $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166541 $t Annals of diagnostic pathology $x 1532-8198 $g Roč. 33, č. - (2018), s. 23-29
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29566943 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181022120258 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1339397 $s 1030221
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 33 $c - $d 23-29 $e 20171111 $i 1532-8198 $m Annals of diagnostic pathology $n Ann. diagn. pathol. $x MED00166541
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008