• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

P16 is a useful supplemental diagnostic marker of pulmonary small cell carcinoma in small biopsies and cytology specimens

M. Švajdler, R. Mezencev, O. Ondič, B. Šašková, P. Mukenšnábl, M. Michal,

. 2018 ; 33 (-) : 23-29. [pub] 20171111

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18033227

Pulmonary small cell carcinoma (SCLC) is usually diagnosed in small biopsy or cytological specimens based on cytomorphology; however in ambiguous cases diagnosis requires additional support by immunohistochemistry. While TP53 and RB1 alterations with secondary overexpression of p16 are mainstay events in SCLC pathogenesis, diagnostic value of p16-positivity in the diagnosis of SCLC has not yet been fully investigated. We examined the expression of p16, CD56, synaptophysin (SYP), chromogranin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) in a series of pulmonary and extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas, pulmonary carcinoids and non-small cell lung carcinomas, and compared diagnostic performance of these markers in the diagnosis of SCLC. P16 was positive in 95 of 101 SCLCs, and displayed highest diagnostic sensitivity of ~94%. Composite biomarkers CD56+p16+TTF1 and CD56+p16+SYP were both able to detect correctly all SCLC cases. Importantly, three (~3%) SCLC cases completely negative for all conventional markers displayed diffuse positivity for p16. CD56 and p16 demonstrated highest concordance between paired small biopsy and cytology specimens. 50% of squamous cell carcinomas, ~41% of adenocarcinoma/NSCLC-favour adenocarcinoma cases, and ~93% of extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas also showed p16-positivity. Combination of CD56, p16 and TTF1 produced diagnostic classifier that outperformed best single marker CD56 in differential diagnosis between SCLC and NSCLC. In conclusion, in the appropriate morphological context p16 represents a useful supplementary marker for diagnosis of SCLC, even in cases where only cytological material is available.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033227
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181022115752.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2017.11.008 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29566943
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Švajdler, Marián $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic. Electronic address: svajdler@biopticka.cz.
245    10
$a P16 is a useful supplemental diagnostic marker of pulmonary small cell carcinoma in small biopsies and cytology specimens / $c M. Švajdler, R. Mezencev, O. Ondič, B. Šašková, P. Mukenšnábl, M. Michal,
520    9_
$a Pulmonary small cell carcinoma (SCLC) is usually diagnosed in small biopsy or cytological specimens based on cytomorphology; however in ambiguous cases diagnosis requires additional support by immunohistochemistry. While TP53 and RB1 alterations with secondary overexpression of p16 are mainstay events in SCLC pathogenesis, diagnostic value of p16-positivity in the diagnosis of SCLC has not yet been fully investigated. We examined the expression of p16, CD56, synaptophysin (SYP), chromogranin A and thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF1) in a series of pulmonary and extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas, pulmonary carcinoids and non-small cell lung carcinomas, and compared diagnostic performance of these markers in the diagnosis of SCLC. P16 was positive in 95 of 101 SCLCs, and displayed highest diagnostic sensitivity of ~94%. Composite biomarkers CD56+p16+TTF1 and CD56+p16+SYP were both able to detect correctly all SCLC cases. Importantly, three (~3%) SCLC cases completely negative for all conventional markers displayed diffuse positivity for p16. CD56 and p16 demonstrated highest concordance between paired small biopsy and cytology specimens. 50% of squamous cell carcinomas, ~41% of adenocarcinoma/NSCLC-favour adenocarcinoma cases, and ~93% of extrapulmonary small cell carcinomas also showed p16-positivity. Combination of CD56, p16 and TTF1 produced diagnostic classifier that outperformed best single marker CD56 in differential diagnosis between SCLC and NSCLC. In conclusion, in the appropriate morphological context p16 represents a useful supplementary marker for diagnosis of SCLC, even in cases where only cytological material is available.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a nádorové biomarkery $x metabolismus $7 D014408
650    _2
$a biopsie $7 D001706
650    _2
$a karcinoid $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D002276
650    _2
$a nemalobuněčný karcinom plic $x patologie $7 D002289
650    _2
$a malobuněčný karcinom $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D018288
650    _2
$a spinocelulární karcinom $x diagnóza $x patologie $7 D002294
650    _2
$a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a geny p16 $x fyziologie $7 D019942
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a imunohistochemie $x metody $7 D007150
650    _2
$a plíce $x patologie $7 D008168
650    _2
$a nádory plic $x patologie $7 D008175
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Mezencev, Roman $u School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
700    1_
$a Ondič, Ondrej $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šašková, Bohuslava $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mukenšnábl, Petr $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Michal, Michal $u Šikl's Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, The Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic; Bioptická laboratoř s.r.o., Pilsen, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00166541 $t Annals of diagnostic pathology $x 1532-8198 $g Roč. 33, č. - (2018), s. 23-29
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29566943 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181022120258 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1339397 $s 1030221
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 33 $c - $d 23-29 $e 20171111 $i 1532-8198 $m Annals of diagnostic pathology $n Ann. diagn. pathol. $x MED00166541
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...