• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Acute Liver Failure due to Amanita phalloides Poisoning: Therapeutic Approach and Outcome

E. Kieslichova, S. Frankova, M. Protus, D. Merta, E. Uchytilova, J. Fronek, J. Sperl,

. 2018 ; 50 (1) : 192-197.

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18033342

INTRODUCTION: Amanita phalloides poisoning is a potentially fatal cause of acute liver failure. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of initial patients' characteristics and different treatment modalities on the outcome of patients with liver failure caused by Amanita poisoning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 23 patients admitted to our center between July 2007 and August 2016. RESULTS: Mean time interval between Amanita phalloides ingestion and the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms was 12.48 ± 9.88 hours and the interval between ingestion and hospital admission 26.26 ± 15.14 hours. The treatment was intiated by oral decontamination using activated charcoal followed by intravenous rehydration and high doses of intravenous N-acetylcysteine and silibinin. Fourteen patients (61%) underwent extracorporeal elimination method. Ten patients had plasmapheresis, 1 patient had hemoperfusion, and 5 patients had fractionated plasma separation and adsorption. Seven patients who met King's College Criteria were listed for urgent liver transplantation; one of them died before transplantation. Six patients underwent liver transplantation; the mean waiting time was 6.5 ± 12.0 days (range, 1-31 days). One patient died 2 months afterward. All 16 patients who did not meet King's College Criteria and received conservative treatment survived. CONCLUSION: Our results documented a good prognostic value of standard King's College Criteria for indication of urgent liver transplantation in acute liver failure caused by Amanita phalloides poisoning. Fractionated plasma separation and adsorption may contribute to low mortality on the waiting list. Intensive care and extracorporeal elimination methods seem to be crucial points of the conservative treatment.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033342
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20250402155153.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.11.032 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29407307
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kieslichova, E $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: eva.kieslichova@ikem.cz.
245    10
$a Acute Liver Failure due to Amanita phalloides Poisoning: Therapeutic Approach and Outcome / $c E. Kieslichova, S. Frankova, M. Protus, D. Merta, E. Uchytilova, J. Fronek, J. Sperl,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION: Amanita phalloides poisoning is a potentially fatal cause of acute liver failure. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of initial patients' characteristics and different treatment modalities on the outcome of patients with liver failure caused by Amanita poisoning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 23 patients admitted to our center between July 2007 and August 2016. RESULTS: Mean time interval between Amanita phalloides ingestion and the onset of gastrointestinal symptoms was 12.48 ± 9.88 hours and the interval between ingestion and hospital admission 26.26 ± 15.14 hours. The treatment was intiated by oral decontamination using activated charcoal followed by intravenous rehydration and high doses of intravenous N-acetylcysteine and silibinin. Fourteen patients (61%) underwent extracorporeal elimination method. Ten patients had plasmapheresis, 1 patient had hemoperfusion, and 5 patients had fractionated plasma separation and adsorption. Seven patients who met King's College Criteria were listed for urgent liver transplantation; one of them died before transplantation. Six patients underwent liver transplantation; the mean waiting time was 6.5 ± 12.0 days (range, 1-31 days). One patient died 2 months afterward. All 16 patients who did not meet King's College Criteria and received conservative treatment survived. CONCLUSION: Our results documented a good prognostic value of standard King's College Criteria for indication of urgent liver transplantation in acute liver failure caused by Amanita phalloides poisoning. Fractionated plasma separation and adsorption may contribute to low mortality on the waiting list. Intensive care and extracorporeal elimination methods seem to be crucial points of the conservative treatment.
650    _2
$a acetylcystein $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000111
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a Amanita $7 D000545
650    _2
$a antidota $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000931
650    _2
$a antioxidancia $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D000975
650    _2
$a dřevěné a živočišné uhlí $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D002606
650    _2
$a konzervativní terapie $x metody $7 D000072700
650    _2
$a péče o pacienty v kritickém stavu $x metody $7 D003422
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a tekutinová terapie $x metody $7 D005440
650    _2
$a hemoperfuze $x metody $7 D006464
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a akutní selhání jater $x etiologie $x terapie $7 D017114
650    _2
$a transplantace jater $x metody $7 D016031
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a otrava houbami $x komplikace $x terapie $7 D009145
650    _2
$a plazmaferéza $x metody $7 D010956
650    _2
$a prognóza $7 D011379
650    _2
$a dialýza ledvin $x metody $7 D006435
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    12
$a stupeň závažnosti nemoci $7 D012720
650    _2
$a silymarin $x aplikace a dávkování $7 D012838
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a seznamy čekatelů $x mortalita $7 D014850
655    _2
$a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Fraňková, Soňa $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0329475
700    1_
$a Protus, M $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Merta, D $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Uchytilova, E $u Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fronek, J $u Department of Transplant Surgery, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sperl, J $u Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Transplantcenter, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00004556 $t Transplantation proceedings $x 1873-2623 $g Roč. 50, č. 1 (2018), s. 192-197
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29407307 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20250402155149 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340883 $s 1030336
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 50 $c 1 $d 192-197 $i 1873-2623 $m Transplantation proceedings $n Transplant Proc $x MED00004556
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace