-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review
J. Han van Krieken, G. Kafatos, J. Bennett, L. Mineur, J. Tomášek, E. Rouleau, P. Fabian, G. De Maglio, P. García-Alfonso, G. Aprile, P. Parkar, G. Downey, G. Demonty, J. Trojan,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, přehledy
NLK
BioMedCentral
od 2001-12-01
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2001
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 2001
PubMed Central
od 2001
Europe PubMed Central
od 2001
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2001-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2001-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2009-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2001-12-01
- MeSH
- antitumorózní látky terapeutické užití MeSH
- chorobopisy MeSH
- dodržování směrnic MeSH
- genetické testování MeSH
- GTP-fosfohydrolasy genetika MeSH
- kolorektální nádory farmakoterapie genetika MeSH
- lékaři MeSH
- lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- membránové proteiny genetika MeSH
- metastázy nádorů MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky terapeutické užití MeSH
- protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) genetika MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies - a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) - were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice. METHODS: Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012-2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014-2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients' records. RESULTS: In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients' records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists.
Gregorio Marañón Hospital Madrid Spain
Institute Sainte Catherine Avignon France
Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen Netherlands
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18033513
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181022130427.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1186/s12885-017-3740-4 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29183279
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Han van Krieken, J $u Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands. Han.vanKrieken@radboudumc.nl.
- 245 10
- $a Panitumumab use in metastatic colorectal cancer and patterns of RAS testing: results from a Europe-wide physician survey and medical records review / $c J. Han van Krieken, G. Kafatos, J. Bennett, L. Mineur, J. Tomášek, E. Rouleau, P. Fabian, G. De Maglio, P. García-Alfonso, G. Aprile, P. Parkar, G. Downey, G. Demonty, J. Trojan,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: In Europe, treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with panitumumab requires prior confirmation of RAS wild-type mutation status. Two studies - a physician survey and a medical records review (MRR) - were conducted to evaluate the use of panitumumab and awareness among prescribing oncologists of the associated RAS testing requirements in clinical practice. METHODS: Both studies enrolled participants from nine European countries and were carried out in three consecutive rounds. Rounds 1 and 2 (2012-2013) examined KRAS (exon 2) testing only; the results have been published in full previously. Round 3 (2014-2015) examined full RAS testing (exons 2, 3, 4 of KRAS and NRAS) and was initiated following a change in prescribing guidelines, from requiring KRAS alone to requiring full RAS testing. For the physician survey, telephone interviews were conducted with oncologists who had prescribed panitumumab to patients with mCRC in the previous 6 months. For the MRR, oncologists were asked to provide anonymised clinical information, extracted from their patients' records. RESULTS: In Round 3, 152 oncologists and 131 patients' records were included in the physician survey and MRR, respectively. In Round 3 of the physician survey, 95.4% (n = 145) of participants correctly identified that panitumumab should only be prescribed in RAS wild-type mCRC compared with 99.0% (n = 298) of 301 participants in Rounds 1 and 2, responding to the same question about KRAS testing. In Round 3 of the MRR, 100% (n = 131) of patients included in the study had confirmed KRAS or RAS wild-type status prior to initiation of panitumumab compared with 97.7% (n = 299) of 306 patients in Rounds 1 and 2 (KRAS only). Of those patients in Round 3, 83.2% (n = 109) had been tested for RAS status and 16.8% (n = 22) had been tested for KRAS status only. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians' adherence to prescribing guidelines has remained high over time in Europe, despite the change in indication for panitumumab treatment, from KRAS to RAS wild-type mCRC. Additionally, this study demonstrates the uptake of full RAS testing among the majority of oncologists and pathologists.
- 650 _2
- $a monoklonální protilátky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000911
- 650 _2
- $a antitumorózní látky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000970
- 650 _2
- $a kolorektální nádory $x farmakoterapie $x genetika $7 D015179
- 650 _2
- $a Evropa $7 D005060
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a GTP-fosfohydrolasy $x genetika $7 D020558
- 650 _2
- $a genetické testování $7 D005820
- 650 _2
- $a dodržování směrnic $7 D019983
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a chorobopisy $7 D008499
- 650 _2
- $a membránové proteiny $x genetika $7 D008565
- 650 _2
- $a metastázy nádorů $7 D009362
- 650 _2
- $a lékaři $7 D010820
- 650 _2
- $a směrnice pro lékařskou praxi jako téma $7 D017410
- 650 _2
- $a lékařská praxe - způsoby provádění $7 D010818
- 650 _2
- $a protoonkogenní proteiny p21(ras) $x genetika $7 D016283
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Kafatos, George $u Amgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Bennett, James $u Amgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Mineur, Laurent $u Institute Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Tomášek, Jiří $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rouleau, Etienne $u Curie Institute, Paris, France.
- 700 1_
- $a Fabian, Pavel $u Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a De Maglio, Giovanna $u University and General Hospital, Udine, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a García-Alfonso, Pilar $u Gregorio Marañón Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
- 700 1_
- $a Aprile, Giuseppe $u University and General Hospital, Udine, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Parkar, Parijan $u Amgen Ltd, Uxbridge, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Downey, Gerald $u Amgen Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Demonty, Gaston $u Amgen GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.
- 700 1_
- $a Trojan, Jörg $u University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008171 $t BMC cancer $x 1471-2407 $g Roč. 17, č. 1 (2017), s. 798
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29183279 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181022130933 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1340185 $s 1030507
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 17 $c 1 $d 798 $e 20171128 $i 1471-2407 $m BMC cancer $n BMC Cancer $x MED00008171
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008