Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Mechanical recanalization in ischemic anterior circulation stroke within an 8-hour time window: a real-world experience

D. Krajíčková, A. Krajina, R. Herzig, M. Lojík, V. Chovanec, J. Raupach, E. Vítková, J. Waishaupt, O. Vyšata, M. Vališ,

. 2017 ; 23 (6) : 465-471.

Language English Country Turkey

Document type Journal Article

PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of mechanical recanalization in patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 8 h since symptoms onset and with unknown onset time. We compared time intervals <6 h vs. 6-8 h/unknown onset time, as only limited data are available for a time window beyond 6 h. METHODS: Our cohort included 110 consecutive patients (44 males; mean age, 73.0±11.5 years) with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation due to the acute occlusion of a large intracranial artery who underwent mechanical recanalization within an 8-hour time window or with unknown onset time. All patients underwent unenhanced computed tomography (CT) of the brain, CT angiography of the cervical and intracranial arteries and digital subtraction angiography. Perfusion CT was performed in patients beyond a 6-hour time window/with unknown onset time. We collected the following data: baseline characteristics, presence of risk factors, neurologic deficit at the time of treatment, time to therapy, recanalization rate, and 3-month clinical outcome. Successful recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3 and good clinical outcome as modified Rankin scale value of 0-2 points. RESULTS: Successful recanalization was achieved in 82 patients (74.5%): in 61 patients treated within 6 h (73.5%), 7 patients treated within 6-8 h (63.6%), and 13 patients with unknown onset time (81.3%). Good 3-month clinical outcome was achieved in 61 patients (55.5%): in 46 patients treated within 6 h (55.4%), 5 patients treated within 6-8 h (45.5%), and 10 patients with unknown onset time (62.5%). Recanalization success or clinical outcome were not significantly different between patients treated at different time windows. CONCLUSION: Our data confirms the safety and effectiveness of mechanical recanalization performed in carefully selected patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 8 h of stroke onset or with unknown onset time in everyday practice.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033658
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181026101428.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2017 tu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.5152/dir.2017.17049 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29033392
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a tu
100    1_
$a Krajíčková, Dagmar $u Departments of Neurology, Comprehensive Stroke Center, Charles University Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. valismar@seznam.cz.
245    10
$a Mechanical recanalization in ischemic anterior circulation stroke within an 8-hour time window: a real-world experience / $c D. Krajíčková, A. Krajina, R. Herzig, M. Lojík, V. Chovanec, J. Raupach, E. Vítková, J. Waishaupt, O. Vyšata, M. Vališ,
520    9_
$a PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the safety and effectiveness of mechanical recanalization in patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 8 h since symptoms onset and with unknown onset time. We compared time intervals <6 h vs. 6-8 h/unknown onset time, as only limited data are available for a time window beyond 6 h. METHODS: Our cohort included 110 consecutive patients (44 males; mean age, 73.0±11.5 years) with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation due to the acute occlusion of a large intracranial artery who underwent mechanical recanalization within an 8-hour time window or with unknown onset time. All patients underwent unenhanced computed tomography (CT) of the brain, CT angiography of the cervical and intracranial arteries and digital subtraction angiography. Perfusion CT was performed in patients beyond a 6-hour time window/with unknown onset time. We collected the following data: baseline characteristics, presence of risk factors, neurologic deficit at the time of treatment, time to therapy, recanalization rate, and 3-month clinical outcome. Successful recanalization was defined as Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b/3 and good clinical outcome as modified Rankin scale value of 0-2 points. RESULTS: Successful recanalization was achieved in 82 patients (74.5%): in 61 patients treated within 6 h (73.5%), 7 patients treated within 6-8 h (63.6%), and 13 patients with unknown onset time (81.3%). Good 3-month clinical outcome was achieved in 61 patients (55.5%): in 46 patients treated within 6 h (55.4%), 5 patients treated within 6-8 h (45.5%), and 10 patients with unknown onset time (62.5%). Recanalization success or clinical outcome were not significantly different between patients treated at different time windows. CONCLUSION: Our data confirms the safety and effectiveness of mechanical recanalization performed in carefully selected patients with ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation within 8 h of stroke onset or with unknown onset time in everyday practice.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a digitální subtrakční angiografie $x metody $7 D015901
650    _2
$a ischemie mozku $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D002545
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a mechanická trombolýza $x metody $7 D061185
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x komplikace $x diagnostické zobrazování $x terapie $7 D020521
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $x metody $7 D014057
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Krajina, Antonín
700    1_
$a Herzig, Roman
700    1_
$a Lojík, Miroslav
700    1_
$a Chovanec, Vendelín
700    1_
$a Raupach, Jan
700    1_
$a Vítková, Eva
700    1_
$a Waishaupt, Jan
700    1_
$a Vyšata, Oldřich
700    1_
$a Vališ, Martin
773    0_
$w MED00165249 $t Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) $x 1305-3612 $g Roč. 23, č. 6 (2017), s. 465-471
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29033392 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181026101939 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340960 $s 1030652
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 23 $c 6 $d 465-471 $i 1305-3612 $m Diagnostic and interventional radiology $n Diagn Interv Radiol $x MED00165249
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...