Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Novel age estimation model based on development of permanent teeth compared with classical approach and other modern data mining methods

M. Štepanovský, A. Ibrová, Z. Buk, J. Velemínská,

. 2017 ; 279 (-) : 72-82. [pub] 20170814

Language English Country Ireland

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

E-resources Online Full text

NLK ProQuest Central from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) from 1997-02-07 to 2 months ago

In order to analyze and improve the dental age estimation in children and adolescents for forensic purposes, 22 age estimation methods were compared to a sample of 976 orthopantomographs (662 males, 314 females) of healthy Czech children and adolescents aged between 2.7 and 20.5 years. All methods are compared in terms of the accuracy and complexity and are based on various data mining methods or on simple mathematical operations. The winning method is presented in detail. The comparison showed that only three methods provide the best accuracy while remaining user-friendly. These methods were used to build a tabular multiple linear regression model, an M5P tree model and support vector machine model with first-order polynomial kernel. All of them have mean absolute error (MAE) under 0.7 years for both males and females. The other well-performing data mining methods (RBF neural network, K-nearest neighbors, Kstar, etc.) have similar or slightly better accuracy, but they are not user-friendly as they require computing equipment and the implementation as computer program. The lowest estimation accuracy provides the traditional model based on age averages (MAE under 0.96 years). Different relevancy of various teeth for the age estimation was found. This finding also explains the lowest accuracy of the traditional averages-based model. In this paper, a technique for missing data replacement for the cases with missing teeth is presented in detail as well as the constrained tabular multiple regression model. Also, we provide free age prediction software based on this wining model.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033757
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181017162603.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2017 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.08.005 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28850870
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Štepanovský, Michal $u Department of Computer Systems, Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 9, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Novel age estimation model based on development of permanent teeth compared with classical approach and other modern data mining methods / $c M. Štepanovský, A. Ibrová, Z. Buk, J. Velemínská,
520    9_
$a In order to analyze and improve the dental age estimation in children and adolescents for forensic purposes, 22 age estimation methods were compared to a sample of 976 orthopantomographs (662 males, 314 females) of healthy Czech children and adolescents aged between 2.7 and 20.5 years. All methods are compared in terms of the accuracy and complexity and are based on various data mining methods or on simple mathematical operations. The winning method is presented in detail. The comparison showed that only three methods provide the best accuracy while remaining user-friendly. These methods were used to build a tabular multiple linear regression model, an M5P tree model and support vector machine model with first-order polynomial kernel. All of them have mean absolute error (MAE) under 0.7 years for both males and females. The other well-performing data mining methods (RBF neural network, K-nearest neighbors, Kstar, etc.) have similar or slightly better accuracy, but they are not user-friendly as they require computing equipment and the implementation as computer program. The lowest estimation accuracy provides the traditional model based on age averages (MAE under 0.96 years). Different relevancy of various teeth for the age estimation was found. This finding also explains the lowest accuracy of the traditional averages-based model. In this paper, a technique for missing data replacement for the cases with missing teeth is presented in detail as well as the constrained tabular multiple regression model. Also, we provide free age prediction software based on this wining model.
650    _2
$a mladiství $7 D000293
650    _2
$a určení zubního věku $x metody $7 D000366
650    _2
$a dítě $7 D002648
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a data mining $7 D057225
650    _2
$a rozhodovací stromy $7 D003663
650    12
$a dentice trvalá $7 D019229
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lineární modely $7 D016014
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a neuronové sítě $7 D016571
650    _2
$a rentgendiagnostika panoramatická $7 D011862
650    _2
$a software $7 D012984
650    _2
$a support vector machine $7 D060388
650    _2
$a zuby $x růst a vývoj $7 D014070
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ibrová, Alexandra $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: ibrovaa@natur.cuni.cz.
700    1_
$a Buk, Zdeněk $u Department of Theoretical Computer Science, Faculty of Information Technology, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 9, 160 00 Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Velemínská, Jana $u Department of Anthropology and Human Genetics, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 128 43 Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00001844 $t Forensic science international $x 1872-6283 $g Roč. 279, č. - (2017), s. 72-82
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28850870 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181017163102 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340980 $s 1030751
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 279 $c - $d 72-82 $e 20170814 $i 1872-6283 $m Forensic science international $n Forensic Sci Int $x MED00001844
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...