• Something wrong with this record ?

Interaction of HEPES buffer with glass-ceramic scaffold: Can HEPES replace TRIS in SBF

D. Rohanová, D. Horkavcová, L. Paidere, AR. Boccaccini, P. Bozděchová, P. Bezdička,

. 2018 ; 106 (1) : 143-152. [pub] 20161127

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

An international standard (ISO: 23317:2014) exists for the in vitro testing of inorganic biomaterials in simulated body fluid (SBF). This standard uses TRIS buffer to maintain neutral pH in SBF, but in our previous paper, we showed that the interaction of a tested glass-ceramic material with TRIS can produce false-positive results. In this study, we evaluated whether the HEPES buffer, which also belongs to the group of Good´s buffers, would be more suitable for SBF. We compared its suitability in two media: SBF with HEPES and demineralized water with HEPES. The tested scaffold (45S5 bioactive glass-based) was exposed to the media under a static-dynamic arrangement (solutions were replaced on a daily basis) for 15 days. Leachate samples were collected daily for the analysis of Ca2+ ions and Si (AAS), (PO4 )3- ions (UV-VIS), and to measure pH. The glass-ceramic scaffold was analyzed by SEM/EDS, XRD, and WD-XRF before and after 0.3, 1, 3, 7, 11, and 15 days of exposure. Our results confirmed the rapid selective dissolution of the glass-ceramic crystalline phase (Combeite) containing Ca2+ ions due to the presence of HEPES, hydroxyapatite supersaturation being reached within 24 h in both solutions. These new results suggest that, like TRIS, HEPES buffer is not suitable for the in vitro testing of highly reactive inorganic biomaterials (glass, glass-ceramics). The ISO standard for such tests requires revision, but HEPES is not a viable alternative to TRIS buffer. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 143-152, 2018.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18034052
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181016104341.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/jbm.b.33818 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)27889932
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Rohanová, Dana $u Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Interaction of HEPES buffer with glass-ceramic scaffold: Can HEPES replace TRIS in SBF / $c D. Rohanová, D. Horkavcová, L. Paidere, AR. Boccaccini, P. Bozděchová, P. Bezdička,
520    9_
$a An international standard (ISO: 23317:2014) exists for the in vitro testing of inorganic biomaterials in simulated body fluid (SBF). This standard uses TRIS buffer to maintain neutral pH in SBF, but in our previous paper, we showed that the interaction of a tested glass-ceramic material with TRIS can produce false-positive results. In this study, we evaluated whether the HEPES buffer, which also belongs to the group of Good´s buffers, would be more suitable for SBF. We compared its suitability in two media: SBF with HEPES and demineralized water with HEPES. The tested scaffold (45S5 bioactive glass-based) was exposed to the media under a static-dynamic arrangement (solutions were replaced on a daily basis) for 15 days. Leachate samples were collected daily for the analysis of Ca2+ ions and Si (AAS), (PO4 )3- ions (UV-VIS), and to measure pH. The glass-ceramic scaffold was analyzed by SEM/EDS, XRD, and WD-XRF before and after 0.3, 1, 3, 7, 11, and 15 days of exposure. Our results confirmed the rapid selective dissolution of the glass-ceramic crystalline phase (Combeite) containing Ca2+ ions due to the presence of HEPES, hydroxyapatite supersaturation being reached within 24 h in both solutions. These new results suggest that, like TRIS, HEPES buffer is not suitable for the in vitro testing of highly reactive inorganic biomaterials (glass, glass-ceramics). The ISO standard for such tests requires revision, but HEPES is not a viable alternative to TRIS buffer. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 106B: 143-152, 2018.
650    _2
$a tělesné tekutiny $x chemie $7 D001826
650    _2
$a keramika $x chemie $7 D002516
650    _2
$a HEPES $x chemie $7 D006531
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a tkáňové podpůrné struktury $x chemie $7 D054457
650    _2
$a tromethamin $x chemie $7 D014325
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Horkavcová, Diana $u Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Paidere, Laine $u Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Boccaccini, Aldo Roberto $u Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
700    1_
$a Bozděchová, Pavlína $u Department of Glass and Ceramics, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Chemistry and Technology Prague, Technická 5, 166 28 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bezdička, Petr $u Institute of Inorganic Chemistry of the ASCR, v.v.i., 250 68, Husinec- Řež, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007497 $t Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials $x 1552-4981 $g Roč. 106, č. 1 (2018), s. 143-152
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27889932 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181016104839 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1339699 $s 1031046
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 106 $c 1 $d 143-152 $e 20161127 $i 1552-4981 $m Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials $n J Biomed Mater Res $x MED00007497
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...