-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Liquid biopsy and multiparametric analysis in management of liver malignancies: new concepts of the patient stratification and prognostic approach
O. Golubnitschaja, J. Polivka, K. Yeghiazaryan, L. Berliner,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
BioMedCentral Open Access
od 2012
PubMed Central
od 2010 do Před 1 rokem
ProQuest Central
od 2010-03-01 do 2018-12-31
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2010-03-01 do 2018-12-31
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Background: The annually recorded incidence of primary hepatic carcinomas has significantly increased over the past two decades accounting for over 800 thousand of annual deaths caused by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) alone globally. Further, secondary liver malignancies are much more widespread compared to primary hepatic carcinomas: almost all solid malignancies are able to metastasise into the liver. The primary tumours most frequently metastasising to the liver are breast followed by colorectal carcinomas. Given the increased incidence of both primary and metastatic liver cancers, a new, revised approach is needed to advance medical care based on predictive diagnostics, innovative screening programmes, targeted preventive measures, and patient stratification for treatment algorithms tailored to individualised patient profile. Advantages of the approach taken: The current pilot study took advantage of systemic alterations characteristic for liver malignancies, utilising liquid biopsy (blood samples) and specific biomarker patterns detected. Key molecular pathways relevant for pathomechanisms of liver cancers have been considered opening a perspective for both-individualised diagnostics and targeted treatment. Systemic alterations have been analysed prior to the therapy application avoiding molecular biological effects potentially diminishing predictive power of the biomarker-panel proposed. Multi-omics at DNA and protein (both expression and activity) levels has been applied. An established biomarker panel is considered as a powerful tool for individualised patient profiling and improved multi-level diagnostics-both predictive and prognostic ones. Results and conclusions: Biomarker panels have been created for the patient stratification, prediction of a more optimal therapy and prognosis of survival based on the individualised patient profiling. Although there are some limitations of the pilot study performed, the results are encouraging, as it may be possible, through further research along these lines, to find a clinically and cost-effective means of stratifying liver cancer patients for personalised care and therapy. The benefits to the patient and society of accurate treatment stratification cannot be overemphasised.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18034229
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181015111000.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2018 sz f 000 00|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1007/s13167-018-0146-6 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30174763
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Golubnitschaja, Olga $u 1Department of Radiology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. 2Breast Cancer Research Centre, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 3Centre for Integrated Oncology, Cologne-Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Liquid biopsy and multiparametric analysis in management of liver malignancies: new concepts of the patient stratification and prognostic approach / $c O. Golubnitschaja, J. Polivka, K. Yeghiazaryan, L. Berliner,
- 520 9_
- $a Background: The annually recorded incidence of primary hepatic carcinomas has significantly increased over the past two decades accounting for over 800 thousand of annual deaths caused by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) alone globally. Further, secondary liver malignancies are much more widespread compared to primary hepatic carcinomas: almost all solid malignancies are able to metastasise into the liver. The primary tumours most frequently metastasising to the liver are breast followed by colorectal carcinomas. Given the increased incidence of both primary and metastatic liver cancers, a new, revised approach is needed to advance medical care based on predictive diagnostics, innovative screening programmes, targeted preventive measures, and patient stratification for treatment algorithms tailored to individualised patient profile. Advantages of the approach taken: The current pilot study took advantage of systemic alterations characteristic for liver malignancies, utilising liquid biopsy (blood samples) and specific biomarker patterns detected. Key molecular pathways relevant for pathomechanisms of liver cancers have been considered opening a perspective for both-individualised diagnostics and targeted treatment. Systemic alterations have been analysed prior to the therapy application avoiding molecular biological effects potentially diminishing predictive power of the biomarker-panel proposed. Multi-omics at DNA and protein (both expression and activity) levels has been applied. An established biomarker panel is considered as a powerful tool for individualised patient profiling and improved multi-level diagnostics-both predictive and prognostic ones. Results and conclusions: Biomarker panels have been created for the patient stratification, prediction of a more optimal therapy and prognosis of survival based on the individualised patient profiling. Although there are some limitations of the pilot study performed, the results are encouraging, as it may be possible, through further research along these lines, to find a clinically and cost-effective means of stratifying liver cancer patients for personalised care and therapy. The benefits to the patient and society of accurate treatment stratification cannot be overemphasised.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Polivka, Jiri $u 4Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 5Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic. 6Department of Neurology, University Hospital Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Yeghiazaryan, Kristina $u 1Department of Radiology, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. 2Breast Cancer Research Centre, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany. 3Centre for Integrated Oncology, Cologne-Bonn, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Berliner, Leonard $u 7Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181668 $t The EPMA journal $x 1878-5077 $g Roč. 9, č. 3 (2018), s. 271-285
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30174763 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181015111456 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1341086 $s 1031223
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 9 $c 3 $d 271-285 $e 20180817 $i 1878-5077 $m The EPMA journal $n EPMA J $x MED00181668
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008